1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
|
.\" Copyright 2013 Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
.\"
.\" This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
.\" it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
.\" the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
.\" (at your option) any later version.
.\"
.\" This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
.\" but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
.\" MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
.\" GNU General Public License for more details.
.\"
.\" You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
.\" along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
.\"
.TH YARN 1
.SH NAME
yarn \- scenario testing of Unix command line tools
.SH SYNOPSIS
.SH DESCRIPTION
.B yarn
is a scenario testing tool:
you write a scenario describing how a user uses your software
and what should happen,
and express,
using very lightweight syntax,
the scenario in such a way that it can be tested automatically.
The scenario has a simple, but strict structure:
.IP
.nf
GIVEN some setup for the test
WHEN thing that is to be tested happens
THEN the post-conditions must be true
.fi
.PP
As an example, consider a very short test scenario for verifying that
a backup program works, at least for one simple case.
.IP
.nf
SCENARIO backups can be restored
GIVEN some live data in a directory
AND an empty backup repository
WHEN a backup is made
THEN the data case be restored
FINALLY cleanup
.fi
.PP
Note the addition of AND: you can have multiple GIVEN, WHEN, and
THEN statements. The AND keyword makes the text be more readable.
SCENARIO is also necessary, and gives the title.
.PP
FINALLY is for cleanups.
The FINALLY steps will be run regardless of whether the scenario succeeds
or not.
.PP
Scenarios are meant to be written in somewhat human readable language.
However, they are not free form text.
In addition to the GIVEN/WHEN/THEN structure,
the text for each of the steps needs a computer-executable implementation.
This is done by using IMPLEMENTS.
The backup scenario from above might be implemented as follows:
.IP
.nf
IMPLEMENTS GIVEN some live data in a directory
rm -rf "$DATADIR/data"
mkdir "$DATADIR/data"
echo foo > "$DATADIR/data/foo"
.IP
IMPLEMENTS GIVEN an empty backup repository
rm -rf "$DATADIR/repo"
mkdir "$DATADIR/repo"
.IP
IMPLEMENTS WHEN a backup is made
backup-program -r "$DATADIR/repo" "$DATADIR/data"
.IP
IMPLEMENTS THEN the data can be restored
mkdir "$DATADIR/restored"
restore-program -r "$DATADIR/repo" "$DATADIR/restored"
diff -rq "$DATADIR/data" "$DATADIR/restored"
.IP
IMPLEMENTS FINALLY cleanup
echo nothing to do, actually
.fi
.PP
Each "IMPLEMENTS GIVEN" (or WHEN, THEN, FINALLY) is followed by a regular
expression on the same line,
and then a shell script that gets executed to implement any step
that matches the regular expression.
The implementation can extract data from the match as well:
for example, the regular expression might allow a file size to be specified.
.PP
The above example is a bit silly, of course:
why go to the effort to obfuscate the various steps?
The answer is that the various steps,
implemented using IMPLEMENTS,
can be combined in many ways,
to test different aspects of the program being tested.
.PP
Moreover,
by making the step descriptions be human language text,
matched by regular expressions,
most of the test can hopefully be written,
and understood,
by non-programmers.
Someone who understands what a program should do,
could write tests to verify its behaviour.
The implementations of the various steps need to be implemented
by a programmer,
but given a well-designed set of steps,
with enough flexibility in their implementation,
that quite a good test suite can be written.
.PP
The shell commands in an IMPLEMENTS section are run in the directory
in which the user ran
.BR yarn .
The environment variable
.B SRCDIR
is set to the fully qualified path to that directory.
.SH OPTIONS
.SH ENVIRONMENT
.TP
.B DATADIR
Fully qualified pathname to a temporary directory,
in which the tests can use files.
The temporary directory is removed at the end of the test execution,
unless the user specifies otherwise with \-\-snapshot.
.TP
.B SRCDIR
Fully qualitifed pathname to the directory in which the user ran
.BR yarn .
This is useful when the tests want to change the directory.
.SH EXAMPLE
To run
.B yarn
on all the scenarios in your current directory:
.IP
.nf
yarn *.scenario
.fi
.PP
All the files will be treated together as if they had been one file.
.PP
To add a shell library to be included when running any IMPLEMENTS section:
.IP
.nf
yarn \-\-shell\-library mylib.sh *.scenario
.fi
.PP
You can repeat
.B \-\-shell\-library
as many times as necessary.
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.BR cmdtest (1),
.BR cliapp (5).
.PP
The README.yarn file has more details on the scenario testing language.
|
