summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>2012-06-30 23:07:16 +0100
committerLars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>2012-06-30 23:07:16 +0100
commita0e5e2e92b752fd78e7a4c2e17e39edb76cfce92 (patch)
tree4db3efc90c94a3a83f88a6d043b2ae21375dd926
parente9fa7a354eb425f8710b6491ea4fc3b01e755cd4 (diff)
downloadgtdfh.liw.fi-a0e5e2e92b752fd78e7a4c2e17e39edb76cfce92.tar.gz
Typo fix
-rw-r--r--read-and-review.mdwn2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/read-and-review.mdwn b/read-and-review.mdwn
index decfaec..5c852e7 100644
--- a/read-and-review.mdwn
+++ b/read-and-review.mdwn
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ I usually try to read things in a FIFO order. I've found that a document
that's boring or unpleasant or otherwise easy to push later, always gets
pushed later. Since there's always new material coming in, there's
never a time when the boring document is the only one to be read. Sticking
-to FIFO, unleass there's an urgent reason to avoid it, is a good way
+to FIFO, unless there's an urgent reason to avoid it, is a good way
of avoiding a pile of documents that never get read.
My threshold for putting something into "read and review" is low.