summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authordistix ticketing system <distix@pieni.net>2018-04-02 06:06:05 +0000
committerdistix ticketing system <distix@pieni.net>2018-04-02 06:06:05 +0000
commitd0876f3736fddefdd55ceb98e58f659700665515 (patch)
tree216fb0b02e3bbac43c15ab80107115064273c8b3
parent157fc426236b630dd3c14f3be095ab8937dc5705 (diff)
downloadick-devel-distix-d0876f3736fddefdd55ceb98e58f659700665515.tar.gz
imported mails
-rw-r--r--tickets/4bbc9995f89d40c59451b743be4a4811/Maildir/new/1522649164.M833050P14060Q1.koom122
1 files changed, 122 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/4bbc9995f89d40c59451b743be4a4811/Maildir/new/1522649164.M833050P14060Q1.koom b/tickets/4bbc9995f89d40c59451b743be4a4811/Maildir/new/1522649164.M833050P14060Q1.koom
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b4a0aeb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/4bbc9995f89d40c59451b743be4a4811/Maildir/new/1522649164.M833050P14060Q1.koom
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+Return-Path: <ick-discuss-bounces@ick.liw.fi>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net (yaffle.pepperfish.net [88.99.213.221])
+ by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AF4C43090
+ for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 06:05:40 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.101.20])
+ by yaffle.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4CE417C7
+ for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 07:05:39 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from ip6-localhost.nat ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1f2sb5-00030L-Oz; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 07:05:39 +0100
+Received: from [10.112.101.21] (helo=mx3.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1f2sb4-000307-6L
+ for <ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi>; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 07:05:38 +0100
+Received: from mail.steve.org.uk ([176.9.183.102] helo=ssh.steve.org.uk)
+ by mx3.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
+ (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <steve@steve.org.uk>) id 1f2sb2-0007yn-0C
+ for ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 07:05:38 +0100
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=steve.org.uk; s=20150726; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:
+ From:Cc:To:Resent-To:Resent-Message-ID:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Sender:
+ Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
+ Content-Description:Resent-Sender:Resent-Cc:List-Id:List-Help:
+ List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
+ bh=JMsJEeOy4IxGf24JJ+D424q0ncB4wpwXBKXDYb3ZzHI=; b=ql4G/XPVNxz3cbTbeYX3C23uJQ
+ gzUbBbeDLWHSoz/0JpLPZTNlB1MjTNEdIzCYALrksHuuzOhkjPTbEmgy7BfBIkLJl/K4zouw3+dzT
+ 6a8B0Em81vDUkcOAf1Ge27lVsh8WY22w9e4Plvr1+J0TKL01WTRSiRdccDJNNm8JWeWE=;
+Received: from steve by ssh.steve.org.uk with local (Exim 4.89)
+ (envelope-from <steve@steve.org.uk>) id 1f2sau-0005Bs-Vg
+ for ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 06:05:29 +0000
+Resent-From: Steve Kemp <steve@steve.org.uk>
+Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 06:05:28 +0000
+Resent-Message-ID: <20180402060528.2aykbpvg4dfhr4vo@steve.org.uk>
+Resent-To: ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi
+To: ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi
+Cc:
+From: Steve Kemp <steve@steve.org.uk>
+Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 14:44:50 +0000
+Message-ID: <1522593890.18807.1@ssh.steve.org.uk>
+In-Reply-To: <1522593545.2971.15.camel@liw.fi>
+References: <1522571699.2971.5.camel@liw.fi>
+ <1522581877.10476.1@ssh.steve.org.uk> <1522593545.2971.15.camel@liw.fi>
+X-added-header: steve.org.uk
+X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 5283-2d25-b877-18c5
+X-Spam-Score: 0.5
+X-Spam-Score-int: 5
+X-Spam-Bar: /
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 02 Apr 2018 07:05:38 +0100
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (0.5 points)
+ pts rule name description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ 2.5 PPF_GTLD_LONG Long gTLD, probably cheap throw-away domain
+ -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain
+ -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0003]
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
+ domain
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: 0b3defc877126cf9a9969fd77535823e
+Subject: Re: What's needed before ick is ready for others to use?
+X-BeenThere: ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: discussions about the ick CI system <ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi>,
+ <mailto:ick-discuss-request@ick.liw.fi?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi>
+List-Post: <mailto:ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi>
+List-Help: <mailto:ick-discuss-request@ick.liw.fi?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi>,
+ <mailto:ick-discuss-request@ick.liw.fi?subject=subscribe>
+Sender: ick-discuss-bounces@ick.liw.fi
+Errors-To: ick-discuss-bounces@ick.liw.fi
+
+> The versions of cliapp (python-, python3-) on code.liw.fi work
+> simultanously for me. There's an older version in stretch that
+> conflicts with python3-cliapp from code.liw.fi, however. I think.
+> Haven't tested recently.
+
+ That probably explains my situation, apart from an abortive effort
+ earlier in the day I've been testing on stretch.
+
+> > The ansible role helps, but the random start-scripts in the top-level
+> > are a distraction.
+>
+> Which scripts do you mean?
+
+ These two, mostly the latter:
+
+ /run-debug
+ /run-artifact-store-debug
+>
+> > > I suspect there is a security problem with the artifact server, but
+> > despite reading the architecture guide I'm missing the ability to
+> > confirm it.
+>
+> Er, yes, I think you're right. The paths should be sanitised. Thanks
+> for pointing that out, I will fix asap.
+
+ No problem. If I thought it were widely used I'd have made more
+ effort to confirm and notified privately.
+
+> I'm sorry you failed to get ick working, but I'm glad to hear you
+> tried. If you're willing to try again and tell me more about what
+> doesn't work, I would be most grateful.
+
+ I'll keep going, it is an interesting project.
+
+Steve
+--
+https://www.steve.org.uk/
+
+_______________________________________________
+ick-discuss mailing list
+ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi
+https://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi