From b8932f185fc2d71102ac74ad27122bb32c4fde83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: distix ticketing system Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 09:11:03 +0000 Subject: imported mails --- .../Maildir/new/1522919463.M158643P16856Q1.koom | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 130 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tickets/8d735e5266c94ec48cf9356549b593c6/Maildir/new/1522919463.M158643P16856Q1.koom diff --git a/tickets/8d735e5266c94ec48cf9356549b593c6/Maildir/new/1522919463.M158643P16856Q1.koom b/tickets/8d735e5266c94ec48cf9356549b593c6/Maildir/new/1522919463.M158643P16856Q1.koom new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a9c3c57 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/8d735e5266c94ec48cf9356549b593c6/Maildir/new/1522919463.M158643P16856Q1.koom @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net (yaffle.pepperfish.net [88.99.213.221]) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E75EF406EB + for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 09:10:11 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.101.20]) + by yaffle.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53A641840 + for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:10:11 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost.nat ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1f40uJ-0003h6-Ni; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:10:11 +0100 +Received: from [10.112.101.104] (helo=mx4.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1f40uI-0003gt-Vh + for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:10:11 +0100 +Received: from mail.steve.org.uk ([176.9.183.102] helo=ssh.steve.org.uk) + by mx4.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) + (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f40uE-0005N2-Ub + for ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:10:10 +0000 +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=steve.org.uk; s=20150726; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject: + From:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type: + Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: + Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: + List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; + bh=NXSwnVIkvJUhy4QWC+LS8UuvMyQsYmz89Ofjvx2CQZ8=; b=Cp0f+HjrdS/PPoDW4aMxKj0i7 + T22GcNHhmAlKPKNKKESzeXoZo9Dm505iD8W7nmYiFMihIiz4dLehuNakGvESOoZczxWPOpqxn+CsU + Q/ayPMmeuA6Twyexvgwx7MfYrt6zTj5kAfrNUFjicTnDMwUsrCdg9Fd10c7p7Fxi9Ch/I=; +Received: from steve by ssh.steve.org.uk with local (Exim 4.89) + (envelope-from ) id 1f40u7-0007BE-AZ + for ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:09:59 +0000 +To: ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi +Cc: +From: Steve Kemp +Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:01:15 +0000 +Message-ID: <1522918875.22924.0@ssh.steve.org.uk> +In-Reply-To: <1522917706.3679.0.camel@liw.fi> +References: <1522917706.3679.0.camel@liw.fi> +X-added-header: steve.org.uk +X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 488f-3e01-9c53-eb2c +X-Spam-Score: 3.4 +X-Spam-Score-int: 34 +X-Spam-Bar: +++ +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:10:10 +0000 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (3.4 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + 2.5 PPF_GTLD_LONG Long gTLD, probably cheap throw-away domain + -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + domain + 1.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% + [score: 0.5000] + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's + domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: 37750eb53cbbcd37f0cf4d6178be310e +Subject: Re: Architecture doc updated - feedback welcom +X-BeenThere: ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: discussions about the ick CI system +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +Sender: ick-discuss-bounces@ick.liw.fi +Errors-To: ick-discuss-bounces@ick.liw.fi + +> Any review and feedback would be welcome. Especially about things that +> are unclear or missing. + + In your example project you use inline python to execute the + three jobs "get_source", "build_ikiwiki_site" & "publish_html", + but I see that the action of the last task is defined as: + + actions: + - shell: | + + Which looks like a mistake, as it doesn't match the previous + entries. + + (Might be nice to make it use a shell-command, to show how + the steps allow non-python!) + + In the section "Getting an access token" you have a broken/bogus + markdown link "[Qvisqve][]". + + All in all this is a great read, I only have two lingering + concerns: + + * Each pipeline acts in the same workspace. The entire pipeline is + executed on the same worker. + + * Credential management. + + The first choice, to let all things work on the same worker, is + obviously simplest. It means that the existing workspace is present + and you don't need to use your artifact storage-system to upload + any in-progress work, and then refetch it. But I suspect that + in complex pipelines running jobs in parallel would be nice. + + With regard to credentials I wonder how you'd clone the source + of a private repository, via git. I could imagine a (horrid) + hack using: + + echo "ssh ..." > .ssh/id_rsa + ssh-keyscan git.example.com > .ssh/known_hosts + git clone .. + + But that is obviously horrid. Do you have any plans to allow + credentials such that private repositories can be cloned? (I + appreciate that this doesn't really belong in the architecture + guide per se.) + + +Steve +-- +https://www.steve.org.uk/ + +_______________________________________________ +ick-discuss mailing list +ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi +https://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi -- cgit v1.2.1