imported mails

1 files changed, 120 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tickets/9da088cc54e14ed48990cbe8e8c5611c/Maildir/new/1469357405.M965394P1123Q1.hrun b/tickets/9da088cc54e14ed48990cbe8e8c5611c/Maildir/new/1469357405.M965394P1123Q1.hrun
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8e69b2a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/9da088cc54e14ed48990cbe8e8c5611c/Maildir/new/1469357405.M965394P1123Q1.hrun
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE1C122945
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:46:11 +0200 (CEST)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70223FD4;
+	Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:46:11 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1bRGvD-0005pC-Af; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:46:11 +0100
+Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1bRGvC-0005ow-5i
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:46:10 +0100
+Received: from upsilon.cc ([178.32.142.91])
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
+ (envelope-from <zack@upsilon.cc>) id 1bRGvA-0000bu-3W
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:46:10 +0100
+Received: from timira.takhisis.invalid (bau75-1-78-194-69-54.fbxo.proxad.net
+ [78.194.69.54]) by upsilon.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB590101CB;
+ Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:45:48 +0200 (CEST)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=upsilon.cc; s=mail;
+ t=1469357148; bh=Ku1lKFwCEi5AoLcPHALzWpYG7oy69xCcYCbUNPg4BxU=;
+ h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
+ b=UR5RAFO2YkaRtlEZ9rdsitr4sFv4iWCRxyttF3QrmMYybbKo+0Az7o9nwPuwqIOzr
+ AstC0nElLIoZUzTiLk5BjRY0odOGF2F6B4KJ3N+8TGX+Fqt7KmGJsSIhg/jU7+vM6I
+ CZu+kL+vJ718L+pfuSw5t4vgIblf/9MkWDQXtGFs=
+Received: by timira.takhisis.invalid (Postfix, from userid 1000)
+ id 453A36052B; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:45:48 +0200 (CEST)
+Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:45:48 +0200
+From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>
+To: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+Message-ID: <20160724104548.GA32296@upsilon.cc>
+References: <20160226085104.GA11872@upsilon.cc>
+ <20160724094246.GG5765@exolobe3>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
+Content-Disposition: inline
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+In-Reply-To: <20160724094246.GG5765@exolobe3>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
+X-Spam-Score: -4.4
+X-Spam-Score-int: -43
+X-Spam-Bar: ----
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:46:10 +0100
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT    User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
+ tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ 0.2 PPF_INREPLYTO_NODOTS   In-Reply-To contains no dots after the @
+ 0.2 PPF_REFERENCES_NODOTS  References contains no dots after the @
+ -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
+ domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: 0e65bd97f891e744da7dd2373f601daa
+Cc: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+Subject: Re: injecting old backup generations
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+Hey Lars, thanks for your answer! All looks good to me, but I do have a
+question about a specific point you raised:
+
+On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 12:42:46PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
+> I don't see a need to do the reverse hook for restoring.
+
+Why?
+
+Aside from the design elegance that round-tripping has in general,
+without the converse mapping people would be unable to just restore a
+system in place.  Not that one *usually* does that, but even if you
+restore in a temp dir having the content of that dir being isomorphic to
+the file-system part it comes from is really handy.
+
+Same goes for timestamps, with the added disadvantage that they would be
+even more difficult to fix upon restore.
+
+It is true that with round-tripping you'll go down the rabbit hole of
+whether you offer a mangling API that *guarantees* round-tripping (which
+would be probably awkward) or just expect users to do that themselves
+(and then allow users to shoot themselves in the foot). But round
+tripping still seems to me the obvious right way to go here. What am I
+missing? Maybe some intrinsic difficulty related to how obnam works
+internally?
+
+Cheers.
+-- 
+Stefano Zacchiroli  . . . . . . .  zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o
+Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
+Former Debian Project Leader . . . . . @zacchiro . . . . o o o . . . o .
+« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org