diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets/a34bbb97ac1d4ad093b20acaf4cdbc86/Maildir/new/1497883205.M37184P27737Q2.koom')
-rw-r--r-- | tickets/a34bbb97ac1d4ad093b20acaf4cdbc86/Maildir/new/1497883205.M37184P27737Q2.koom | 103 |
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/a34bbb97ac1d4ad093b20acaf4cdbc86/Maildir/new/1497883205.M37184P27737Q2.koom b/tickets/a34bbb97ac1d4ad093b20acaf4cdbc86/Maildir/new/1497883205.M37184P27737Q2.koom new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b91f865 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/a34bbb97ac1d4ad093b20acaf4cdbc86/Maildir/new/1497883205.M37184P27737Q2.koom @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org> +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B95AA4460C + for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:36:16 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948DCBA0; + Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:16 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1dMxmq-000726-GF; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:16 +0100 +Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net ([88.99.213.221] + helo=inmail2.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1dMxmo-00071r-Ly + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:14 +0100 +Received: from davros.xk7.net ([46.43.0.197]) + by inmail2.pepperfish.net with esmtps + (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) + (envelope-from <paul@xk7.net>) id 1dMxmm-0004WG-DT + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:14 +0100 +Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8011:1f:0:a453:5e1b:d606:8355] (unknown + [IPv6:2a02:8011:1f:0:a453:5e1b:d606:8355]) + by davros.xk7.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B167E647D + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:05 +0100 (BST) +To: obnam-dev@obnam.org +References: <20170619143239.egma6t52nudu6jqq@liw.fi> +From: Paul Waring <paul@xk7.net> +Message-ID: <f8a37c55-7e8f-9177-5aec-fcfc5880dffb@xk7.net> +Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:05 +0100 +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 + Thunderbird/52.1.1 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +In-Reply-To: <20170619143239.egma6t52nudu6jqq@liw.fi> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed +Content-Language: en-US +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 2fe6-d9e4-b2fd-8e3f +X-Spam-Score: -2.3 +X-Spam-Score-int: -22 +X-Spam-Bar: -- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:14 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -0.3 PPF_FROM_UK RBL: A Received line involves an address from the UK + [46.43.0.197 listed in gb.country.dnsbl.rjek.com] + -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists + 0.4 PPF_WINDOWS_CHARSET Content-Type is in a Windows-* charset + -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + domain + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: e22476795c0c271ab9cf3b1ad5ae1506 +Subject: Re: More informative Obnam progress reporting +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org> +List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe> +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 + +On 19/06/17 15:32, Lars Wirzenius wrote: +> It struck me the other day that it would be nice if Obnam could give +> more progress feedback reporting: +> +> * position in current file: some files are very large and it taks a +> long time to check them completely +> +> * how much duplicate data is NOT uploaded in this run +> +> * how far in the backup we are, compared to previous generatation +> +> * momentary upload speed, both raw and "effective" (chunk data only) +> +> What do others think? + +This would definitely be useful, although the other 'progress' area that +I think could be improved is when attempting to mount for restoring. If +you have a lot of generations (>500 did it for me) then obnam sits there +with no progress indication and you have no idea whether it's working, +stuck in a loop, hung etc. + +-- +Paul Waring +Freelance consultant +https://www.pwaring.com + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org + |