From 9b642642d692ad7f1d92390f3bdb22478ed2933f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Distix listener Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:15:04 +0100 Subject: imported mails --- .../Maildir/new/1456485304.M206023P9185Q1.hrun | 267 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 267 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tickets/858bd68d2ee748e0a36d22d7de31aba7/Maildir/new/1456485304.M206023P9185Q1.hrun (limited to 'tickets/858bd68d2ee748e0a36d22d7de31aba7') diff --git a/tickets/858bd68d2ee748e0a36d22d7de31aba7/Maildir/new/1456485304.M206023P9185Q1.hrun b/tickets/858bd68d2ee748e0a36d22d7de31aba7/Maildir/new/1456485304.M206023P9185Q1.hrun new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5a1c856 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/858bd68d2ee748e0a36d22d7de31aba7/Maildir/new/1456485304.M206023P9185Q1.hrun @@ -0,0 +1,267 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43FE12DB7E + for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:13:46 +0100 (CET) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CCCCB0; + Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:45 +0000 (GMT) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1aZGLB-0002n0-No; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:45 +0000 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1aZGLA-0002mu-Lj + for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:44 +0000 +Received: from mail12.static.mgsend.net ([104.130.122.12]) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) + (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1aZGL8-000183-G4 + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:44 +0000 +DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=michel-slm.name; + q=dns/txt; + s=mailo; t=1456485209; h=Content-Type: Cc: To: Subject: Message-ID: + Date: From: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: Sender; + bh=ns+3DQBb+zauIjZmb9cgaWfdVRAWWeiOWTOrIWAZ9Cg=; + b=Q1BWTISNOrrCZhOlK1kBGuofvihGPqBBEi041sPiYNzQ1mFO8uK/nhnMjXkVkHmAgpjb0V+R + X6Pz6ChP1sedSZVgl4nPFGceNEXtXGh1R8DM6WcVx5HTxSFUeEMUbFqs1c2wIqlDSjGS4uss + lth2J42T1jZ6ADTF/79K1anCOxw= +DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=michel-slm.name; s=mailo; + q=dns; h=Sender: MIME-Version: References: In-Reply-To: From: Date: + Message-ID: Subject: To: Cc: Content-Type; + b=qn5NqTH9j0iacovxDw/IfqAaIFAHpk2xRFfcwvFaKdxCWwl7/bWaszF+dbVjvayWogKjio + 1W2pBh1xMFit7t/2e+jzmGMsM+zB6QEzXCRfTulHaJdnxDLvtPhsDSfcp5teXKQDMZ/Bu9R0 + T6DZiNNZL7FrWhFIY6CfNwb+fxCVk= +X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0ZTk0NiIsICJvYm5hbS1kZXZAb2JuYW0ub3JnIiwgIjcwMGU3YiJd +Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com + [209.85.214.177]) + by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 56d03359.7f9584aeacf0-in02; + Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:29 -0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id s6so24963477obg.3 + for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 03:13:29 -0800 (PST) +X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIZALWZxIaH/N5kHSBwDL7fR0RGYAoAnp6SUBesj12zW0aSRzk3TFGTMLtUtGxgrMwN0o3+SMNDEhbRdQ== +X-Received: by 10.182.250.169 with SMTP id zd9mr642832obc.59.1456485209336; + Fri, 26 Feb 2016 03:13:29 -0800 (PST) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +References: + <20160220152252.GF2352@exolobe1.liw.fi> +In-Reply-To: <20160220152252.GF2352@exolobe1.liw.fi> +From: Michel Alexandre Salim +Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:19 +0000 +X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: +Message-ID: +To: Lars Wirzenius +X-Spam-Score: -0.3 +X-Spam-Score-int: -2 +X-Spam-Bar: / +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:44 +0000 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-0.3 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + 0.2 PPF_ALTERNATIVES Body in multipart/alternative + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] + 0.3 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + 0.2 PPF_NUMERIC_ENTITY RAW: Body contains numeric HTML entities + 1.0 PPF_BLANK RAW: Body contains _blank + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's + domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: a666c81763ff4e2a6943a1cb0afcc507 +Cc: "obnam-dev@obnam.org" +Subject: Re: [PATCH] coverage-4.0a6 compatibility for larch +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3833048585176397272==" +Mime-version: 1.0 +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +--===============3833048585176397272== +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160c35c85f52d052caa634b + +--089e0160c35c85f52d052caa634b +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +Hi Lars, + +No need, I'll just drop the patch when the next release comes out. + +Cheers, + +- +Michel Alexandre Salim + +On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, 22:22 Lars Wirzenius wrote: + +> Thanks. Applied and pushed. Do you need me to make a larch release of +> this for Fedora? +> +> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 04:25:22PM +0000, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: +> > Hi Lars, +> > +> > Similar to previous coverage 4.0a6 compatibility patches; this one +> patches +> > the 'check' target of larch's Makefile to not assume that a .coverage +> file +> > exists, by using 'rm -f' instead of 'rm'. +> > +> > Best regards, +> > +> > -- +> > Michel Alexandre Salim +> +> > From c7dcbb40a5352106425bb3038cbdeb17b938a602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +> > From: Michel Alexandre Salim +> > Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:03:42 +0700 +> > Subject: [PATCH] coverage-4.0a6 compatibility +> > +> > coverage 4.0a6 no longer generates .coverage file, so use -f when +> > deleting .coverage to ensure deletion does not fail. +> > --- +> > Makefile | 2 +- +> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) +> > +> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile +> > index 7818f57..362c07f 100644 +> > --- a/Makefile +> > +++ b/Makefile +> > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ fsck-larch.1: fsck-larch.1.in fsck-larch +> > +> > check: +> > python -m CoverageTestRunner --ignore-missing-from=3Dwithout-test= +s +> > - rm .coverage +> > + rm -f .coverage +> > ./insert-remove-test tempdir 100 +> > rm -r tempdir larch.log +> > cmdtest tests +> > -- +> > 2.5.0 +> > +> +> > _______________________________________________ +> > obnam-dev mailing list +> > obnam-dev@obnam.org +> > +> http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam= +.org +> +> +> -- +> Schr=C3=B6dinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is +> undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh +> + +--089e0160c35c85f52d052caa634b +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +

Hi Lars,

+

No need, I'll just drop the patch when the next release = +comes out.

+

Cheers,

+

-
+Michel Alexandre Salim

+
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, 22:22= +=C2=A0Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> w= +rote:
Thanks. Applied and pushed. D= +o you need me to make a larch release of
+this for Fedora?
+
+On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 04:25:22PM +0000, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
+> Hi Lars,
+>
+> Similar to previous coverage 4.0a6 compatibility patches; this one pat= +ches
+> the 'check' target of larch's Makefile to not assume that = +a .coverage file
+> exists, by using 'rm -f' instead of 'rm'.
+>
+> Best regards,
+>
+> --
+> Michel Alexandre Salim
+
+> From c7dcbb40a5352106425bb3038cbdeb17b938a602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001= +
+> From: Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@michel-slm.name>
+> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:03:42 +0700
+> Subject: [PATCH] coverage-4.0a6 compatibility
+>
+> coverage 4.0a6 no longer generates .coverage file, so use -f when
+> deleting .coverage to ensure deletion does not fail.
+> ---
+>=C2=A0 Makefile | 2 +-
+>=C2=A0 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+>
+> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
+> index 7818f57..362c07f 100644
+> --- a/Makefile
+> +++ b/Makefile
+> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ fsck-larch.1: fsck-larch.1.in fsck-larch
+>
+>=C2=A0 check:
+>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0python -m CoverageTestRunner --ignore-missin= +g-from=3Dwithout-tests
+> -=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0rm .coverage
+> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0rm -f .coverage
+>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0./insert-remove-test tempdir 100
+>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0rm -r tempdir larch.log
+>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0cmdtest tests
+> --
+> 2.5.0
+>
+
+> _______________________________________________
+> obnam-dev mailing list
+> obnam-dev@obn= +am.org
+> http://listmaster.= +pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
+
+
+--
+Schr=C3=B6dinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is +undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh
+
+ +--089e0160c35c85f52d052caa634b-- + + +--===============3833048585176397272== +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Content-Disposition: inline + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org + +--===============3833048585176397272==-- + -- cgit v1.2.1