From 1a5c3f173ec1de1dabe5dda7b839fcaaa37137c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Distix listener Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 17:50:07 +0200 Subject: imported mails --- .../Maildir/new/1472399405.M288217P6668Q1.hrun | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 209 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tickets/b54ff7b128594150bac6caa38b045a30/Maildir/new/1472399405.M288217P6668Q1.hrun (limited to 'tickets') diff --git a/tickets/b54ff7b128594150bac6caa38b045a30/Maildir/new/1472399405.M288217P6668Q1.hrun b/tickets/b54ff7b128594150bac6caa38b045a30/Maildir/new/1472399405.M288217P6668Q1.hrun new file mode 100644 index 0000000..813b468 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/b54ff7b128594150bac6caa38b045a30/Maildir/new/1472399405.M288217P6668Q1.hrun @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0441221CF0 + for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 17:45:52 +0200 (CEST) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BB1BE2; + Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:45:51 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1be2HP-0006sD-FA; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:45:51 +0100 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1be2HN-0006s7-C7 + for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:45:49 +0100 +Received: from mail-qt0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) + id 1be2HL-0001Y2-Ao + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:45:49 +0100 +Received: by mail-qt0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w38so58511459qtb.0 + for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 08:45:41 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; + bh=wRAZ8cLnV61NjAy8jx4/No/FAAIY+sJPFKk9yWq51M4=; + b=hIpRhOl/O3Bng8goUjeJ6XAvvE2UkddlWoWcbM1dJYfmBXZAH0rtVBToThU3jnU1pW + AN3ptshMkXzEhHJnAcNgF4XLrYkIqzFsnZmuqhIxpbmh7FlJ50XQlGqL/Ri21HVWATjQ + ggxXFMmDpEXkBz5LIpkLwmjVLRN2vofaGI7Z09vBwzW+FNgoOe09woHhtyyQAsEatDCW + pBqLC/Wu6InuS1twhNCavUOGvf8Ytq34Lq4qEXiWQ0X8eGFDSfX/fxLhWasO+c1BB7bv + aIn15IipcGviBMjHoBB0zoFPpMzMglDZSFEAm2dWTJrqGftiZsUYhacwyFNfZXmsx59z + 9ezg== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20130820; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date + :message-id:subject:to; + bh=wRAZ8cLnV61NjAy8jx4/No/FAAIY+sJPFKk9yWq51M4=; + b=iA4l6S6j4VkrOrEgLwym1MjvJq0SE2ArSXFrKTszwdYhKKW4cMVmhwFHKd5cBGEDWH + d8m51aInyMKABGkMjYBYALQi6HhfH7zFEBaZiUbUHJFm+teFYQZmLnGJXFVsWuxE7cQt + Pwq3G8pfN15rFxFgc/4wYF31gCW9lkjqhGbHEmF9oQ71h3xioRaYsj+6LShszNdRZxWn + 5IoQXgyGVLbIQEs1rsitEFjkCXo6GjkMYvcRDW+R+yGGReFCJr9/YlkMqbpTr6s/Kkve + T/nqR14D69hCo/X13eUBAlsnEZryLY4lAv5eQlI9msxW+dX+bua65KlezRmaMkWqmT9v + SWkg== +X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOFpOQCdfA4lGJ474Jh1LORi+GGf82Jm3WWRbKkP/C9MM8T8rsY+zpCpgG6pr7tkBr23B/FzoRVce+33A== +X-Received: by 10.200.49.129 with SMTP id h1mr14029991qte.103.1472399135036; + Sun, 28 Aug 2016 08:45:35 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.140.83.144 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 08:45:33 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.140.83.144 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 08:45:33 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: +References: <7ddf7fdb-a88b-79dd-f04e-f5db9bafe395@maxgaukler.de> + <20160828150535.quo5jviy2rcg3ewi@exolobe3> + +From: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpbWkgUmFtcGlu?= +Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:45:33 -0400 +Message-ID: +To: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Spam-Score: 2.2 +X-Spam-Score-int: 22 +X-Spam-Bar: ++ +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:45:49 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (2.2 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + 0.2 PPF_ALTERNATIVES Body in multipart/alternative + 0.5 PPF_RECEIVED_HTTP Received header mentions http + 0.2 PPF_REFERENCES_NODOTS References contains no dots after the @ + 1.0 PPF_FROM_CONTAINS_MAIL The From header contains 'mail' + 1.2 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (remirampin[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + 0.3 HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] + 0.3 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + 0.2 PPF_NUMERIC_ENTITY RAW: Body contains numeric HTML entities + 1.0 PPF_BLANK RAW: Body contains _blank + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's + domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature + -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low + trust [209.85.216.176 listed in list.dnswl.org] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: ee5e95cd2050c0bee0b77e76c207dc88 +Subject: Re: [PATCH] extend gitignore +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0269370932551423784==" +Mime-version: 1.0 +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +--===============0269370932551423784== +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c00386695b59053b23a303 + +--001a11c00386695b59053b23a303 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +Indeed, if you won't accept patches with .pyc files in it, putting that in +the .gitignore file makes a lot of sense. + +Clutter is not really an issue if the file is already there... that also +makes it harder for users to just add that, since then the file will always +be reported as changed, unless they agree to alter their global settings +instead for this one project. + +On Aug 28, 2016 11:40 AM, "Maximilian Gaukler" +wrote: + +> I don't get your point about why you don't want to include it. From what +> you say, I understood that you also want a clean `git diff`. +> +> As obnam already has a .gitignore, I don't see any downsides of just +> adding it to make new developers' life easier, as nothing will change for +> you. +> +> From the perspective of someone starting development, having to manually +> add entries to global a .gitignore is tedious and may even cause problems +> somewhere else. Actually, the purpose I see in a per-repository .gitignore +> is that one can just clone and be happy, which is the standard I +> experienced with almost any significant open-source project. +> +> This request was not directed towards other projects, at least as long as +> I am not working on them :-) +> +> Thanks for your consideration, +> +> Max +> +> _______________________________________________ +> obnam-dev mailing list +> obnam-dev@obnam.org +> http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ob +> nam-dev-obnam.org +> + +--001a11c00386695b59053b23a303 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +

Indeed, if you won't accept patches with .pyc files in i= +t, putting that in the .gitignore file makes a lot of sense.

+

Clutter is not really an issue if the file is already there.= +.. that also makes it harder for users to just add that, since then the fil= +e will always be reported as changed, unless they agree to alter their glob= +al settings instead for this one project.

+

On Aug 28, 2016 1= +1:40 AM, "Maximilian Gaukler" <development@maxgaukler.de> wrote:
I don't get your point about why you= + don't want to include it. From what you say, I understood that you als= +o want a clean `git diff`.
+
+As obnam already has a .gitignore, I don't see any downsides of just ad= +ding it to make new developers' life easier, as nothing will change for= + you.
+
+>From the perspective of someone starting development, having to manually ad= +d entries to global a .gitignore is tedious and may even cause problems som= +ewhere else. Actually, the purpose I see in a per-repository .gitignore is = +that one can just clone and be happy, which is the standard I experienced w= +ith almost any significant open-source project.
+
+This request was not directed towards other projects, at least as long as I= + am not working on them :-)
+
+Thanks for your consideration,
+
+Max
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.or= +g
+http://listmaster.peppe= +rfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
+
+ +--001a11c00386695b59053b23a303-- + + +--===============0269370932551423784== +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Content-Disposition: inline + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org + +--===============0269370932551423784==-- + -- cgit v1.2.1