From 2744575bcaa271507f645a69af0c1bfe35636741 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Distix listener Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 17:45:08 +0200 Subject: imported mails --- .../Maildir/new/1472399107.M639375P6282Q1.hrun | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tickets/b54ff7b128594150bac6caa38b045a30/Maildir/new/1472399107.M639375P6282Q1.hrun (limited to 'tickets') diff --git a/tickets/b54ff7b128594150bac6caa38b045a30/Maildir/new/1472399107.M639375P6282Q1.hrun b/tickets/b54ff7b128594150bac6caa38b045a30/Maildir/new/1472399107.M639375P6282Q1.hrun new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ed3733b --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/b54ff7b128594150bac6caa38b045a30/Maildir/new/1472399107.M639375P6282Q1.hrun @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2292620936 + for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 17:40:48 +0200 (CEST) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1596B42; + Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:47 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1be2CV-0006YP-Id; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:47 +0100 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1be2CT-0006Y7-Mu + for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:45 +0100 +Received: from dd20434.kasserver.com ([85.13.140.148]) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) + id 1be2CR-0001Ny-UB + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:45 +0100 +Received: from [192.168.1.46] + (dslb-088-077-016-247.088.077.pools.vodafone-ip.de [88.77.16.247]) + by dd20434.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CB8B33807F7 + for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 17:40:37 +0200 (CEST) +To: obnam-dev@obnam.org +References: <7ddf7fdb-a88b-79dd-f04e-f5db9bafe395@maxgaukler.de> + <20160828150535.quo5jviy2rcg3ewi@exolobe3> +From: Maximilian Gaukler +Message-ID: +Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 17:41:17 +0200 +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 + Icedove/45.2.0 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +In-Reply-To: <20160828150535.quo5jviy2rcg3ewi@exolobe3> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Spam-Score: -2.3 +X-Spam-Score-int: -22 +X-Spam-Bar: -- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:45 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low + trust [85.13.140.148 listed in list.dnswl.org] + 0.4 PPF_WINDOWS_CHARSET Content-Type is in a Windows-* charset + -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists + 0.2 PPF_INREPLYTO_NODOTS In-Reply-To contains no dots after the @ + 0.2 PPF_REFERENCES_NODOTS References contains no dots after the @ + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: 33c28d4dad91734d931da14cc3b51e8a +Subject: Re: [PATCH] extend gitignore +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +I don't get your point about why you don't want to include it. From what +you say, I understood that you also want a clean `git diff`. + +As obnam already has a .gitignore, I don't see any downsides of just +adding it to make new developers' life easier, as nothing will change +for you. + + From the perspective of someone starting development, having to +manually add entries to global a .gitignore is tedious and may even +cause problems somewhere else. Actually, the purpose I see in a +per-repository .gitignore is that one can just clone and be happy, which +is the standard I experienced with almost any significant open-source +project. + +This request was not directed towards other projects, at least as long +as I am not working on them :-) + +Thanks for your consideration, + +Max + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org -- cgit v1.2.1