From 7e205147047295f749e4f297e8f27756f937c6b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Distix listener Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:10:10 +0100 Subject: imported mails --- .../Maildir/new/1478013008.M826472P22787Q1.hrun | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 133 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tickets/0a7d5c2a6bcf49a3ad01dde1996a35b9/Maildir/new/1478013008.M826472P22787Q1.hrun (limited to 'tickets') diff --git a/tickets/0a7d5c2a6bcf49a3ad01dde1996a35b9/Maildir/new/1478013008.M826472P22787Q1.hrun b/tickets/0a7d5c2a6bcf49a3ad01dde1996a35b9/Maildir/new/1478013008.M826472P22787Q1.hrun new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b4446ff --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/0a7d5c2a6bcf49a3ad01dde1996a35b9/Maildir/new/1478013008.M826472P22787Q1.hrun @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B4CD24E3B + for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:07:25 +0100 (CET) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB964BA6; + Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:07:24 +0000 (GMT) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1c1aeq-0002LR-Kp; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:24 +0000 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1c1aeo-0002L9-Ia + for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:22 +0000 +Received: from pieni.net ([95.142.166.37] ident=postfix) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ael-0001o5-Cx + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:22 +0000 +Received: from exolobe3.liw.fi (unknown [194.157.43.230]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A74D325197 + for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:07:11 +0100 (CET) +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by exolobe3.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE741121DFB + for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:07:09 +0200 (EET) +Message-ID: <1478012829.2701.4.camel@liw.fi> +From: Lars Wirzenius +To: obnam-dev@obnam.org +Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:07:09 +0200 +In-Reply-To: +References: +X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.1-2 +Mime-Version: 1.0 +X-Pepperfish-Transaction: c4da-820e-68c7-6a17 +X-Spam-Score: -1.9 +X-Spam-Score-int: -18 +X-Spam-Bar: - +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:22 +0000 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.9 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: f002631632f2cb3301b65fcd1d45d147 +Subject: Re: Sereal encoding scheme +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0435073011382111132==" +Mime-version: 1.0 +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + + +--===============0435073011382111132== +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ECLgqU2NheXcqCcTKpdq" + + +--=-ECLgqU2NheXcqCcTKpdq +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 15:56 +0100, Gabriel Moreau wrote: +> I remember some work about the Sereal protocol done on Perl. + +Having code in Perl is of little use for Obnam, which uses Python. If +there's an implementation in Python, it's not in Debian. I don't want +to add dependencies outside of Debian to Obnam. + +Also, http://blog.liw.fi/posts/dependency-cost/ is relevant. + +> Maybe reuse the Sereal encoding scheme could be a good idea ? + +Given the Obnam implementation has been written since May, 2015, and +doesn't seem to have any issues I care about (and that means it's not a +speed bottleneck either), I'd really rather not start looking at other +ways of doing the same thing. + +--=-ECLgqU2NheXcqCcTKpdq +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" +Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQIcBAABCgAGBQJYGK+dAAoJEGwvphbseiAx3U4P/icLRs31QWHgFr02a1CxUDKr +deRIG9CXY4nKZ+xFul/ab4iFUtJ/SN4vhx1UzqFOrT4ZwkgNAQxloTP8CvyiNShu +LDbnYqqBPSTFeTQfHjADyIMXDxL6HzMAa3GBMYOVUVaOqEe3kr7vk1Jc14nT7bWB +bx8EWZ/PILl3QTlQk0K9xIUI8vLfS0KoSdWMGY6+Ld7P2x0PJ2IUUzf64HzxwH3Z ++DLb3VE2chJIlCSzJ+FInrd9R/RlZKE5w4q7wc/FVMFZEDTbgbMlC6ikoliCGJjb +D7uUGIH5iMQC8uIVnhDgy/1p66prjy7OOpjDx1fDW6AH018G1H0YtIn8qsoSvLya +sKFlRhsplaWYWHgdZwBRClYAoQhLzRu8FXaSbmaSj4fv8+1+N76gW6V2CFohIFOA +T25yNqTLIZsUgX7zMpGScaeB+rji81xtW5Kxxzfk9A+yj/pK0sL2+p1ZeMLeMM2g ++EbYq1JDU6UVVHxkClOkscMTAb+7EFz5ToA8CVM9DCu45uWPLP1qg/MMN8XVXTFq +RZNy0t1YcTBVRxY+x+K1Z+v+Nz+pWkIxzobpLynRMl6byNqZv+VdNfKc8PA0ivOh +RmepuIMS8RYub5/jS/jDYK6mNoNqbSPIUNuaEt4SjhUUODuO4I6hxrLM8Om4rjET +hmRYMJacARKKB2IhiTaA +=XfsC +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--=-ECLgqU2NheXcqCcTKpdq-- + + + +--===============0435073011382111132== +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Content-Disposition: inline + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org + +--===============0435073011382111132==-- + + -- cgit v1.2.1