From f501e067b557939785d86e86b1c07c3a574e16b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Distix listener Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:05:10 +0100 Subject: imported mails --- .../Maildir/new/1486555509.M32154P19359Q1.hrun | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tickets/182bd772889544d5867e1a0ce4e76652/Maildir/new/1486555509.M32154P19359Q1.hrun (limited to 'tickets') diff --git a/tickets/182bd772889544d5867e1a0ce4e76652/Maildir/new/1486555509.M32154P19359Q1.hrun b/tickets/182bd772889544d5867e1a0ce4e76652/Maildir/new/1486555509.M32154P19359Q1.hrun new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2f0e247 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/182bd772889544d5867e1a0ce4e76652/Maildir/new/1486555509.M32154P19359Q1.hrun @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A622227343 + for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:02:33 +0100 (CET) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EF8ECB; + Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:02:32 +0000 (GMT) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1cbQxE-0007pe-6g; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:02:32 +0000 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1cbQxC-0007pE-LR + for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:02:30 +0000 +Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de ([80.67.29.28]) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) + id 1cbQxA-00083w-8M + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:02:30 +0000 +Received: from [217.247.204.188] (helo=euler.schwinge.homeip.net) + by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) + (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) + id 1cbQwu-00034v-Ni + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:02:12 +0100 +Received: (nullmailer pid 26439 invoked by uid 1000); + Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:02:20 -0000 +From: Thomas Schwinge +To: Lars Wirzenius , Obnam development +In-Reply-To: <20170121144532.lxn3alp4he4nvrwy@exolobe3> +References: <20170121144532.lxn3alp4he4nvrwy@exolobe3> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9-125-g4686d11 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:34:07 +0100 +Message-ID: <87shnoapcg.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +X-Df-Sender: b3V0Z29pbmdAc2Nod2luZ2UubmFtZQ== +X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 46f5-362a-3973-6c02 +X-Spam-Score: -2.7 +X-Spam-Score-int: -26 +X-Spam-Bar: -- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:02:30 +0000 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.7 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists + 0.2 PPF_INREPLYTO_NODOTS In-Reply-To contains no dots after the @ + 0.2 PPF_REFERENCES_NODOTS References contains no dots after the @ + -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low + trust [80.67.29.28 listed in list.dnswl.org] + -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: dec02e0749d215982dbb7ebe51425d50 +Subject: Re: Obnam FORMAT GREEN ALBATROSS status and roadmap +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +Hi Lars! + +On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:45:32 +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: +> I intend to get the new Obnam repository format, GREEN ALBATORSS, +> finished this year. + +:-) + + +One idea I just had -- but I don't know if that is feasible to implement: +you could (internally!) have obnam "write" both the "current" and the +"Green Albatross" formats, and then every "read" operation would read +both of them, and compare that they return the same data. Then have +obnam complain if that doesn't match (with the "current" format's data +then taking precedence, I think). Obviously, that will add a lot of +overhead for every repository access, but any users willing to take that +can then easily help testing the "Green Albatross" format. But I don't +know if the repository abstraction in obnam is sufficiently generic for +being able to deal with two underlying repository formats, etc. + + +Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe + Thomas + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org -- cgit v1.2.1