Return-Path: X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A7ED22852 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:19:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11394EF8; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:19:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1cXu50-0006KV-OQ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:19:58 +0000 Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1cXu4z-0006KG-QM for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:19:57 +0000 Received: from benson.default.arb33.uk0.bigv.io ([46.43.0.16]) by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cXu4y-0007eY-2F for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:19:57 +0000 Received: from cpc91198-cmbg18-2-0-cust103.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([81.98.98.104] helo=dagon.hellion.org.uk) by benson.default.arb33.uk0.bigv.io with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cXu4o-0006dR-21; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:19:46 +0000 Message-ID: <1485713985.7612.13.camel@hellion.org.uk> From: Ian Campbell To: SanskritFritz Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:19:45 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1485518787.6091.12.camel@hellion.org.uk> <1485684052.7612.7.camel@hellion.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 6157-52dc-94cf-718b X-Spam-Score: -2.2 X-Spam-Score-int: -21 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:19:57 +0000 X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.3 PPF_FROM_UK RBL: A Received line involves an address from the UK [81.98.98.104 listed in gb.country.dnsbl.rjek.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam X-Scan-Signature: cecca6c27994651bb0dac64a37340985 Cc: Obnam development Subject: Re: Kdirstat merged to Qdirstat X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Obnam development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 18:52 +0100, SanskritFritz wrote: > I really recommend uding qdirstat after this :D Yes, I would switch right away if only it were packaged in Debian (/me goes hunting for ITP/RFP bugs...). Given this I think your patch is indeed the best approach. I'd recommend reposting as a standalone thread with a subject "[PATCH] Concise explanation of the change" (so Lars sees it) and a commit message explaining the circumstances in the body before the patch. Ian. _______________________________________________ obnam-dev mailing list obnam-dev@obnam.org http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org