1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
|
Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B95AA4460C
for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:36:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948DCBA0;
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:16 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1dMxmq-000726-GF; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:16 +0100
Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net ([88.99.213.221]
helo=inmail2.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1dMxmo-00071r-Ly
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:14 +0100
Received: from davros.xk7.net ([46.43.0.197])
by inmail2.pepperfish.net with esmtps
(TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <paul@xk7.net>) id 1dMxmm-0004WG-DT
for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:14 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8011:1f:0:a453:5e1b:d606:8355] (unknown
[IPv6:2a02:8011:1f:0:a453:5e1b:d606:8355])
by davros.xk7.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B167E647D
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:05 +0100 (BST)
To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
References: <20170619143239.egma6t52nudu6jqq@liw.fi>
From: Paul Waring <paul@xk7.net>
Message-ID: <f8a37c55-7e8f-9177-5aec-fcfc5880dffb@xk7.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170619143239.egma6t52nudu6jqq@liw.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 2fe6-d9e4-b2fd-8e3f
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Score-int: -22
X-Spam-Bar: --
X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:36:14 +0100
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.3 PPF_FROM_UK RBL: A Received line involves an address from the UK
[46.43.0.197 listed in gb.country.dnsbl.rjek.com]
-0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists
0.4 PPF_WINDOWS_CHARSET Content-Type is in a Windows-* charset
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
X-Scan-Signature: e22476795c0c271ab9cf3b1ad5ae1506
Subject: Re: More informative Obnam progress reporting
X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4
On 19/06/17 15:32, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> It struck me the other day that it would be nice if Obnam could give
> more progress feedback reporting:
>
> * position in current file: some files are very large and it taks a
> long time to check them completely
>
> * how much duplicate data is NOT uploaded in this run
>
> * how far in the backup we are, compared to previous generatation
>
> * momentary upload speed, both raw and "effective" (chunk data only)
>
> What do others think?
This would definitely be useful, although the other 'progress' area that
I think could be improved is when attempting to mount for restoring. If
you have a lot of generations (>500 did it for me) then obnam sits there
with no progress indication and you have no idea whether it's working,
stuck in a loop, hung etc.
--
Paul Waring
Freelance consultant
https://www.pwaring.com
_______________________________________________
obnam-dev mailing list
obnam-dev@obnam.org
http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
|
