imported mails

1 files changed, 96 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tickets/eea0e58a8b7a4b0b985b21046e139ccc/Maildir/new/1501515019.M474587P5467Q1.koom b/tickets/eea0e58a8b7a4b0b985b21046e139ccc/Maildir/new/1501515019.M474587P5467Q1.koom
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7708490
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/eea0e58a8b7a4b0b985b21046e139ccc/Maildir/new/1501515019.M474587P5467Q1.koom
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net (yaffle.pepperfish.net [88.99.213.221])
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EABC641176
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:28:10 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.101.20])
+	by yaffle.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A8D417D3;
+	Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:28:10 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from ip6-localhost.nat ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1dcCc6-0001G5-Mu; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:28:10 +0100
+Received: from [10.112.101.21] (helo=mx3.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1dcCc5-0001Fl-57
+ for <obnam-support@obnam.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:28:09 +0100
+Received: from mail.dasr.de ([217.69.77.164])
+ by mx3.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
+ (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <neal@walfield.org>) id 1dcCc3-0003wA-BB
+ for obnam-support@obnam.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:28:09 +0100
+Received: from p5ddf99ae.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.223.153.174]
+ helo=chu.walfield.org)
+ by mail.dasr.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
+ (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <neal@walfield.org>)
+ id 1dcCbx-00030G-Oz; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:28:01 +0000
+Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:28:01 +0200
+Message-ID: <87r2wwhbi6.wl-neal@walfield.org>
+From: "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org>
+To: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+In-Reply-To: <20170729131625.rvfvel7d5vrl7hoo@liw.fi>
+References: <87mv7nty3v.wl-neal@walfield.org>
+ <20170729131625.rvfvel7d5vrl7hoo@liw.fi>
+User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
+ FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/25.1
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
+MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
+X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 7d84-1c01-0833-ccb2
+X-Spam-Score: -2.4
+X-Spam-Score-int: -23
+X-Spam-Bar: --
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:28:09 +0100
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.4 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
+ trust [217.69.77.164 listed in list.dnswl.org]
+ -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: dec02e0749d215982dbb7ebe51425d50
+Cc: obnam-support <obnam-support@obnam.org>
+Subject: Re: Backups of backups
+X-BeenThere: obnam-support@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam backup software discussion <obnam-support-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-support-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-support-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-support@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-support-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-support-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Sender: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org
+
+On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:16:25 +0200,
+Lars Wirzenius wrote:
+> > My current backup of backup solution is to use 'zfs send' to replicate
+> > my backup to an offsite location.  This works great, but has the
+> > limitation that the offsite server has to have the same amount of disk
+> > space as the onsite server.
+> > 
+> > Does obnam have any support for backups of backups?  For instance, I
+> > think it would be cool to just propagate a particular generation?
+> > Then, my offsite backup might only have the last few backups, but the
+> > onsite backup could keep a longer history.
+> 
+> Obnam doesn't support that. If you want to have backups in two
+> locations, why not run Obnam twice, once per location?
+
+Unfortunately, it is cheap to send data, but expensive to read it.  If
+I correctly understand how obnam works, then obnam does a lot of
+reading to compare data even if nothing has changed.  (If that's not
+true, then please correct me!)
+
+Thanks!
+
+:) Neal
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-support mailing list
+obnam-support@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org