diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502944126.M771670P22856Q1.koom | 106 |
1 files changed, 106 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502944126.M771670P22856Q1.koom b/tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502944126.M771670P22856Q1.koom new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a0d039c --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502944126.M771670P22856Q1.koom @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +Return-Path: <obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org> +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net (yaffle.pepperfish.net [88.99.213.221]) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614C145B24 + for <distix@pieni.net>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 04:24:49 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.101.20]) + by yaffle.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3972418B0; + Thu, 17 Aug 2017 05:24:48 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost.nat ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1diCMS-0006aE-Ue; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 05:24:48 +0100 +Received: from [10.112.101.21] (helo=mx3.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1diCMS-0006Zy-96 + for <obnam-support@obnam.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 05:24:48 +0100 +Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) + by mx3.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) + (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <gcsbo-obnam-2@m.gmane.org>) + id 1diCMP-0001qy-V4 + for obnam-support@obnam.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 05:24:48 +0100 +Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) + (envelope-from <gcsbo-obnam-2@m.gmane.org>) id 1diCMB-0004kj-2U + for obnam-support@obnam.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 06:24:31 +0200 +X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ +To: obnam-support@obnam.org +From: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> +Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 23:24:24 -0500 +Lines: 34 +Message-ID: <87a82yzurr.fsf@alphapapa.net> +References: <20170813184758.hbel3jxgultskktu@liw.fi> +Mime-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org +User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) +X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 60f5-ac95-8284-6500 +X-Spam-Score: -1.1 +X-Spam-Score-int: -10 +X-Spam-Bar: - +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Thu, 17 Aug 2017 05:24:48 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.1 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists + 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail + domains are different + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] + 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: 8887c701ef4198506b295ef73f0e38b1 +Subject: Re: [obnam-announce] Retiring Obnam +X-BeenThere: obnam-support@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam backup software discussion <obnam-support-obnam.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-support-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-support-obnam.org> +List-Post: <mailto:obnam-support@obnam.org> +List-Help: <mailto:obnam-support-request@obnam.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-support-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe> +Sender: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org + +Lars, + +I am very sad to hear this, but I understand your decision. You have +put an enormous amount of work into Obnam, and created a wonderful tool, +but there are some problems that can't be solved perfectly without +solving them, shall we say, suboptimally, first. ;) Such is the nature +of cutting-edge software. + +Obnam is what it is because you put your heart into it, but if that's no +longer the case, then it's time to move on. I appreciate that you have +made the decision, rather than letting the project exist in limbo with +false hope. Maybe someone else will carry it forward. + +As for the users, I think Obnam has helped inspire other tools that will +carry on in spirit, if by another name. I don't know if any of them +will match Obnam's attention to detail, documentation, testing tools, +etc., but we will make do. + +Today I've been experimenting with restic, and so far I am impressed. A +significant drawback is that it doesn't yet support compression (it's on +their list), but it has impressive speed, and its expiration tools +address one shortcoming of Obnam's implementation. borg is another tool +I plan to try out, as well as zbackup. + +I wonder if we should start some kind of "Obnam users support group." I +feel almost as if I've lost a trusted friend. :) But, as they say, all +good things... + +I'm looking forward to seeing what projects you come up with in the +future, Lars. Thanks for Obnam. + +Adam + + + + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-support mailing list +obnam-support@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org |