From 11e58846bf5d5b7e4c7c9d5be4e1b26cd5984f92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: distix ticketing system Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:19:28 +0000 Subject: imported mails --- .../Maildir/new/1502817567.M426084P18595Q1.koom | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502817567.M426084P18595Q1.koom diff --git a/tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502817567.M426084P18595Q1.koom b/tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502817567.M426084P18595Q1.koom new file mode 100644 index 0000000..582a85e --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502817567.M426084P18595Q1.koom @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net (yaffle.pepperfish.net [88.99.213.221]) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D985444AD7 + for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:13:13 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.101.20]) + by yaffle.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9D8417A6; + Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:13:13 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost.nat ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1dhfOz-0001wp-HR; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:13:13 +0100 +Received: from [10.112.101.21] (helo=mx3.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1dhfOz-0001wc-5I + for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:13:13 +0100 +Received: from davros.xk7.net ([46.43.0.197]) + by mx3.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) + (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dhfOw-0007Y1-SF + for obnam-support@obnam.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:13:13 +0100 +Received: from [192.168.1.94] (unknown [164.39.71.226]) + by davros.xk7.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E997E5A53 + for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:13:03 +0100 (BST) +To: obnam-support@obnam.org +References: <20170813184758.hbel3jxgultskktu@liw.fi> + + + +From: Paul Waring +Message-ID: <74f0940f-86d7-b153-6187-9c2638d575ae@xk7.net> +Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:13:01 +0100 +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 + Thunderbird/52.2.1 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +In-Reply-To: +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed +Content-Language: en-US +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 967c-023b-28b2-01ee +X-Spam-Score: -3.6 +X-Spam-Score-int: -35 +X-Spam-Bar: --- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:13:13 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.6 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -0.3 PPF_FROM_UK RBL: A Received line involves an address from the UK + [164.39.71.226 listed in gb.country.dnsbl.rjek.com] + -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists + -1.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] + 0.1 PPF_SPLIT_TAG RAW: Body contains a split HTML tag +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: 0e65bd97f891e744da7dd2373f601daa +Subject: Re: [obnam-announce] Retiring Obnam +X-BeenThere: obnam-support@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam backup software discussion +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +Sender: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org + +On 15/08/17 17:55, SanskritFritz wrote: +> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Henri Sivonen > wrote: +> +> On the topic of switching to another backup program: Do you have a +> recommendation? Or, phrased another way, what backup solution are you +> planning on using for your own data going forward? +> +> +> There are basically two other backup programs that are similar to Obnam: +> Borgbackup (a fork of Attic) and Zbackup. Both use a rolling hash +> algorithm for chunking, a feature that was planned in Obnam. +> Borgbackup is really similar to Obnam even features-wise. It is very +> actively developed. +> Zbackup is more like stability oriented and simpler, hence more robust. +> Try both. I don't know of any other chunking deduplicating free open +> source backup tool. + +I have not looked into the technical details but restic appears to have +a similar interface to borgbackup and obnam: + +https://restic.github.io/ + +The downside I have found with borg is that it doesn't seem to have a +configuration file format, which means you have to supply all the +arguments on the command line each time. + +-- +Paul Waring +Freelance consultant +https://www.pwaring.com + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-support mailing list +obnam-support@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org -- cgit v1.2.1