From 989c36fdb15281f23fcf043155e66767e9f3f94f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: distix ticketing system Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:57:29 +0000 Subject: imported mails --- .../Maildir/new/1502816248.M555193P14430Q1.koom | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 165 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502816248.M555193P14430Q1.koom diff --git a/tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502816248.M555193P14430Q1.koom b/tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502816248.M555193P14430Q1.koom new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1005b86 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/f0cbd17bf39c46b6b6ceb942e051f2c6/Maildir/new/1502816248.M555193P14430Q1.koom @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net (yaffle.pepperfish.net [88.99.213.221]) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D385440908 + for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:56:37 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.101.20]) + by yaffle.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6CC41881; + Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:56:37 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost.nat ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1dhf8v-0000Gl-76; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:56:37 +0100 +Received: from [10.112.101.21] (helo=mx3.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1dhf8t-0000GY-Fi + for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:56:35 +0100 +Received: from mail-qk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170]) + by mx3.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) + (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) + id 1dhf8q-0007Bs-Lk + for obnam-support@obnam.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:56:35 +0100 +Received: by mail-qk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u139so7245231qka.1 + for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:56:25 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to + :cc; bh=N0vLI/AsfkEtUyJJt8oThxiokFAlJf9VCnKbw8SgKJQ=; + b=jlW8lFsJEYxZwGmT2RBOrfhoZwHR0omwgrm9kIHc+4mRK7Oor47i3JhvT9+AdwteJk + YLrqLlM2E2QdZs3gSxJuulH+byDH/LSUiKSdUTMrOVRcVkymJeyFmk4xMdK8ay5XoZIl + lwCYXKh9J8AO1OvxDg9wlkGwD8OKJP7XJYWgLThluc9eL0NphmzNRryTH8wQKLXpdB+W + 2C7qXVDEjCkokQ1RyK28STixsOj622PWtGdp6W1xrkGZGVd+/HJoMC6SsPRAoGs61HJ7 + f8quNxz//kImSP/V5Wu/vZjkIpGqBVgfjyqS3WWMRXftenNY+LFNIuxZ1DZkE0G4TdaN + R2Qg== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20161025; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date + :message-id:subject:to:cc; + bh=N0vLI/AsfkEtUyJJt8oThxiokFAlJf9VCnKbw8SgKJQ=; + b=UE7mr1X1T3/4AQZM4oiOHDSlOnq9/6zSM+wiimzNF7jjnQlEApAuVui8ui36v6+u3D + S93ZKPRHD+Me16nmpGCVxSGhFZN5oYhYNKsRH/yIcusSlFushIA0E/q2zmzzmRdJGxWZ + gUnnlHMZiVJoV1huCTOXbnj2ZPSoIu7vl8P0FXm2FLYvqstxCW/iHVTN2tNeCFpVlDZU + +M2ZaRdnGO9YNPIpvpCYh0ac4/4gWai5/IxA4cfC/v1Gy8qoDLcrLeMY8faTNgJXPENx + 2ighPp+rjhxKBcbTnDSvoD1GGQPumWOd8MBX36u4w4Pd+EJAi9Ge5kwvbRY4m/MnxUoN + duYw== +X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5gWPeR7QhiHBljQYBy1XJALplOYBCCQvRc46Ymqnc10AQXZhoON + qIC3K6maHv8a20fwPZUO5BraigGO7A== +X-Received: by 10.55.67.69 with SMTP id q66mr33980645qka.37.1502816183991; + Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:56:23 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.200.38.35 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:55:43 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: +References: <20170813184758.hbel3jxgultskktu@liw.fi> + + +From: SanskritFritz +Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:55:43 +0200 +Message-ID: +To: Henri Sivonen +X-Pepperfish-Transaction: c9ae-0219-877f-2081 +X-Spam-Score: 2.4 +X-Spam-Score-int: 24 +X-Spam-Bar: ++ +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:56:35 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (2.4 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + 0.5 PPF_RECEIVED_HTTP Received header mentions http + 1.0 PPF_FROM_CONTAINS_MAIL The From header contains 'mail' + 0.2 PPF_ALTERNATIVES Body in multipart/alternative + 1.2 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (sanskritfritz[at]gmail.com) + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] + 0.3 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + 0.2 PPF_NUMERIC_ENTITY RAW: Body contains numeric HTML entities + 1.0 PPF_BLANK RAW: Body contains _blank + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's + domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) + [209.85.220.170 listed in wl.mailspike.net] + -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no + trust [209.85.220.170 listed in list.dnswl.org] + -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: 6b148f58eff8842ce2b68b994f4d7805 +Cc: Obnam support +Subject: Re: [obnam-announce] Retiring Obnam +X-BeenThere: obnam-support@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam backup software discussion +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2763720921471133122==" +Mime-version: 1.0 +Sender: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org + +--===============2763720921471133122== +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114ab996cf44820556cda809" + +--001a114ab996cf44820556cda809 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" + +On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote: + +> On the topic of switching to another backup program: Do you have a +> recommendation? Or, phrased another way, what backup solution are you +> planning on using for your own data going forward? +> +> +There are basically two other backup programs that are similar to Obnam: +Borgbackup (a fork of Attic) and Zbackup. Both use a rolling hash algorithm +for chunking, a feature that was planned in Obnam. +Borgbackup is really similar to Obnam even features-wise. It is very +actively developed. +Zbackup is more like stability oriented and simpler, hence more robust. +Try both. I don't know of any other chunking deduplicating free open source +backup tool. + +--001a114ab996cf44820556cda809 +Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +

= +On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> wrote:
On the topic of switc= +hing to another backup program: Do you have a
+recommendation? Or, phrased another way, what backup solution are you
+planning on using for your own data going forward?
+

There are basically two other backup programs that are sim= +ilar to Obnam: Borgbackup (a fork of Attic) and Zbackup. Both use a rolling= + hash algorithm for chunking, a feature that was planned in Obnam.
Borgbackup is really similar to Obnam even feat= +ures-wise. It is very actively developed.
Zbackup is more like stability oriented and simpler, hence more robust.<= +br>
Try both. I don't know of any other= + chunking deduplicating free open source backup tool.



+ +--001a114ab996cf44820556cda809-- + + +--===============2763720921471133122== +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Content-Disposition: inline + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-support mailing list +obnam-support@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org + +--===============2763720921471133122==-- + -- cgit v1.2.1