From ca9573a2b521b60a20b3da87b62f2afa13154bdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: distix ticketing system Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:16:52 +0000 Subject: imported mails --- .../Maildir/new/1501334212.M725042P20371Q1.koom | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tickets/eea0e58a8b7a4b0b985b21046e139ccc/Maildir/new/1501334212.M725042P20371Q1.koom diff --git a/tickets/eea0e58a8b7a4b0b985b21046e139ccc/Maildir/new/1501334212.M725042P20371Q1.koom b/tickets/eea0e58a8b7a4b0b985b21046e139ccc/Maildir/new/1501334212.M725042P20371Q1.koom new file mode 100644 index 0000000..643a97a --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/eea0e58a8b7a4b0b985b21046e139ccc/Maildir/new/1501334212.M725042P20371Q1.koom @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net (yaffle.pepperfish.net [88.99.213.221]) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74F96404D1 + for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:16:38 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.101.20]) + by yaffle.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C31F418D2; + Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:16:38 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost.nat ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1dbRbi-0005lJ-1q; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:16:38 +0100 +Received: from [10.112.101.21] (helo=mx3.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1dbRbg-0005l3-OZ + for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:16:36 +0100 +Received: from koom.pieni.net ([88.99.190.206] helo=pieni.net) + by mx3.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) + (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dbRbf-00060O-7Q + for obnam-support@obnam.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:16:36 +0100 +Received: from exolobe3.liw.fi (82-181-57-241.bb.dnainternet.fi + [82.181.57.241]) by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89CA0404D1; + Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:16:27 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from liw.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by exolobe3.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A261D1200CC; + Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:16:26 +0300 (EEST) +Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:16:25 +0300 +From: Lars Wirzenius +To: "Neal H. Walfield" +Message-ID: <20170729131625.rvfvel7d5vrl7hoo@liw.fi> +References: <87mv7nty3v.wl-neal@walfield.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +In-Reply-To: <87mv7nty3v.wl-neal@walfield.org> +User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) +X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 36f8-4d27-f7d7-f3d6 +X-Spam-Score: -3.4 +X-Spam-Score-int: -33 +X-Spam-Bar: --- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:16:36 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.4 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists + -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam + tool) + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: b5b6efd43804d51bf1f49b1dee60e806 +Cc: obnam-support +Subject: Re: Backups of backups +X-BeenThere: obnam-support@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam backup software discussion +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6792043201662493007==" +Mime-version: 1.0 +Sender: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org + + +--===============6792043201662493007== +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fivklwbnyat4gwhj" +Content-Disposition: inline + + +--fivklwbnyat4gwhj +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 11:02:12AM +0200, Neal H. Walfield wrote: +> Hi, +>=20 +> My current backup of backup solution is to use 'zfs send' to replicate +> my backup to an offsite location. This works great, but has the +> limitation that the offsite server has to have the same amount of disk +> space as the onsite server. +>=20 +> Does obnam have any support for backups of backups? For instance, I +> think it would be cool to just propagate a particular generation? +> Then, my offsite backup might only have the last few backups, but the +> onsite backup could keep a longer history. + +Obnam doesn't support that. If you want to have backups in two +locations, why not run Obnam twice, once per location? + +--=20 +I want to build worthwhile things that might last. --joeyh + +--fivklwbnyat4gwhj +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQIzBAABCgAdFiEETNTnrewG6wEE1EJ3bC+mFux6IDEFAll8iqgACgkQbC+mFux6 +IDFXmw/+Jz4fxhLJ0OgIVDh3bQs2MeC4/b/VUAN5s0MGxDKeJAQ2gE/muCHg68Um +GaS1edFqYGRMfHbPMC5mXco8IyGSqUor/fBmaffsawFSDsQ+2DJG6WBMnoR4q88j +R8q+QISQU70PPrP9/5NEi0V27s5Nfs3EPpSQwxrDjofLlIkgH+a1MV3jhJ6aaRYR +O3CBxSuWumvyzfmvXk+dlHT5wP6Imtez+ZQrcZwQGxCEaFB6W8w5MbU2OmyFwKUy +PnRuBXqsjk1y+2hsJUEJWK+wojoncvjRVHMrz9GZBe57jYec66NglNc2iurIqGIm +rYw9VUxOfLupEOKAmWKxUUKG/6yb681u8zzgzgWEFk0z/dc1/F00CO+27GZScVt4 +vqu/v9i1qor5vT61E7KblVvFiKsadGwVF2zeDNic90K54tz55ZHVNy8OBtSjU5Lf +LYhMMM8FRAOkK9g5V009xQ2o69/UDStFNGCoSawV+1zMSCx+8auHYTuLIkAZFbSY +Sk2nZKVTzOmMWcOf2Lub581/jOtEGN1ZmknCv7dK83YpCMRr2VpDDFDmUe3s2885 +1WHASd9/XOF+r7SN7cX1YRY9HPkkkK3EfPBVO+naPQT6E7K/TXhzqK+OllmtH2Ev +E+VvYVwTGWgThCU66X+9MNUuqG4sucJoXhcWpYrcpa6noQwQkAQ= +=tvvL +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--fivklwbnyat4gwhj-- + + +--===============6792043201662493007== +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Content-Disposition: inline + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-support mailing list +obnam-support@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org + +--===============6792043201662493007==-- + -- cgit v1.2.1