Return-Path: X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net (yaffle.pepperfish.net [88.99.213.221]) by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41D9F43EA7 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 07:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.101.20]) by yaffle.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2566E417E4; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:44:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from ip6-localhost.nat ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1dcRqS-0004wY-3m; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 08:44:00 +0100 Received: from [10.112.101.21] (helo=mx3.pepperfish.net) by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1dcRqR-0004wB-91 for ; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 08:43:59 +0100 Received: from mail.kula.co.nz ([116.90.133.217]) by mx3.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dcRqP-00040z-4Y for obnam-support@obnam.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 08:43:59 +0100 Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.2.16]) by mail.kula.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA7B60A100E0 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:43:46 +1200 (NZST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at amavis.internal Received: from mail.kula.co.nz ([10.0.0.13]) by localhost (amavis.internal [10.0.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jkXUXqRxBJau for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:43:43 +1200 (NZST) Received: from flick (unknown [114.110.37.182]) by mail.kula.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0475C608F9BCE for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:43:44 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <1501573424.27147.346.camel@etc.gen.nz> From: Andrew Ruthven To: obnam-support@obnam.org Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 19:43:44 +1200 In-Reply-To: <87shhchbla.wl-neal@walfield.org> References: <87mv7nty3v.wl-neal@walfield.org> <87shhchbla.wl-neal@walfield.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 465f-f2f0-1b3b-9f96 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Score-int: -18 X-Spam-Bar: - X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Tue, 01 Aug 2017 08:43:59 +0100 X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam X-Scan-Signature: ca8a4ca37a1c4d653545520aa2407c9e Subject: Re: Backups of backups X-BeenThere: obnam-support@obnam.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Obnam backup software discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org Errors-To: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 17:26 +0200, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:06:20 +0200, > SanskritFritz wrote: > > If you had enough space on the offsite system, you can upload the > > whole repo and then later you just have to > > incrementally rsync the difference. I don't think Obnam sports such > > a feature to actually split a repo. > > Thanks for the suggestion.  But, I suspect that 'zfs send' is > probably > better (zfs send doesn't have to stat every file to find > differences). How about putting your obnam repo on a zfs partition, then use `zfs send` to replicate the repo to your remote location? Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand andrew@etc.gen.nz             | linux.conf.au 2018, Sydney, AU    New Zealand's only Cloud:   |  Just a little bit of history https://catalyst.net.nz/cloud |     http://linux.conf.au _______________________________________________ obnam-support mailing list obnam-support@obnam.org http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org