From 58bfac863fea033187a63eabd7ea8cea048adcc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Wirzenius Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:41:52 +0100 Subject: Fix some spelling mistakes in the manual --- manual/en/080-forgetting.mdwn | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'manual/en/080-forgetting.mdwn') diff --git a/manual/en/080-forgetting.mdwn b/manual/en/080-forgetting.mdwn index 52d10a75..1df2ff64 100644 --- a/manual/en/080-forgetting.mdwn +++ b/manual/en/080-forgetting.mdwn @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ space you're willing to spend on protecting against them. spectacular way, such as by catching fire or being stolen? If so, you really only need one very recent backup to cover against that. * Do you worry about your hard drive, or filesystem, or your - applicatin programs, or you yourself, slowly corrupting your data + application programs, or you yourself, slowly corrupting your data over a longer period of time? How long will it take you to find that out? You need a backup history that lasts longer than it takes for you to detect slow corruption. @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ want to compare how things were each year in between. With increasing storage space and nice de-duplication features, this isn't quite as expensive as it might be. -There is no one schedule that fits everyones needs and wants. You have -to decide for youself. That's why the default in Obnam is to keep +There is no one schedule that fits everyone's needs and wants. You have +to decide for yourself. That's why the default in Obnam is to keep everything forever. It's not Obnam's duty to decide that you should not keep this or that backup generation. -- cgit v1.2.1