summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Silverstone <daniel.silverstone@codethink.co.uk>2020-09-12 17:24:22 +0100
committerDaniel Silverstone <daniel.silverstone@codethink.co.uk>2020-09-12 17:24:22 +0100
commit57e898650a340c842520fc709e878395633e7fbf (patch)
tree85b1a7a5798744a26da5c3ec9d2b4794783d12b4
parent809ea604f0f2549bb0a1f1970c85723e6bbbf6b1 (diff)
downloadsubplot.liw.fi-57e898650a340c842520fc709e878395633e7fbf.tar.gz
Iteration for today
Signed-off-by: Daniel Silverstone <daniel.silverstone@codethink.co.uk>
-rw-r--r--blog/2020/09/12/iteration_planning_note_september_12.mdwn67
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/blog/2020/09/12/iteration_planning_note_september_12.mdwn b/blog/2020/09/12/iteration_planning_note_september_12.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0dddf05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blog/2020/09/12/iteration_planning_note_september_12.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+[[!meta title="Iteration planning note: August 29"]]
+[[!tag meeting]]
+[[!meta date="2020-09-12 17:30"]]
+
+# What has happened?
+
+We finished [[!milestone 13]]. Many small tasks were done, and while that looks
+like many items of work, it wasn't a huge amount over-all due to the size of
+them. Daniel did not get his [[!issue 20]] done, and the Python context
+namespace issue ([[!issue 80]]) was also not done.
+
+We chose therefore to demilestone [[!issue 20]].
+
+# Review
+
+We had not MRs or branches to review. We reviewed issues younger than 2 weeks
+from last change, picking a few for the new iteration.
+
+We reviewed Lars' questions on the [[!issue 53]] and decided:
+
+- Code/Test in the same file is OK until the tests overwhelm the code
+- We do not have complex enough code to warrant multiple crates at this time
+ as sibling modules are sufficiently protected from one another.
+- We want to split out a `src/doc.rs` module for the `Document` struct and
+ friends. [[!issue 88]] was created for this.
+
+We went through [[!issue 82]] and wrote a rough plan of action and a set of
+labels to indicate this is not hard and we'd love help to get it done.
+
+We added a brief explanation more to [[!issue 74]].
+
+The new iteration [[!milestone 14]] has TODO assigned issues:
+
+- [[!issue 80]] (moved from 13) assigned to Lars
+- [[!issue 86]] we logged some suggests here too, assigned to Lars
+- [[!issue 88]] assigned to Lars
+- [[!issue 85]] we added some suggestions for other `:foo` too
+- [[!issue 83]]
+
+# Discussion
+
+Lars would like to review the codebase with a view to deciding what is the next
+step for [[!issue 53]] but as of now there's not really anything good to format
+the content well enough for him to be comfortable reviewing it on his
+reMarkable.
+
+Regarding the use of subplot by others, we previously said that we needed the
+documentation to cover everything that Subplot lets you do. Lars is going to
+talk with a friend/colleague of his who is a sysadmin with a background in
+technical writing so if she's interested then it's possible she might be able to
+help with that.
+
+With respect to having `subplot.liw.fi`'s content on gitlab, the only benefit
+Daniel can think of is that it'd be easier for third parties to contribute
+changes. In the end we decided that until someone says "I would contribute if
+only the website were on Gitlab" we'll stick with things as they are.
+
+We discussed possible issues which a newcomer to Rust and to the project might
+find easy to do. [[!issue 22]] (The plantuml one) might be a good one to
+start with.
+
+We should also keep our eyes peeled for "easy" Rust changes which we could file
+easy/mentor/help-wanted issues to file.
+
+# Actions
+
+No unusual actions came out of the meeting.