meeting: iteration meeting

1 files changed, 55 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/blog/2020/11/21/iteration.mdwn b/blog/2020/11/21/iteration.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bf68f5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blog/2020/11/21/iteration.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+[[!meta title="Iteration planning meeting: November 21st"]]
+[[!meta date="2020-11-21 18:29:30"]]
+[[!tag meeting]]
+
+We finished [[!milestone 17]], completing [[!issue 115]], [[!issue
+114]], [[!issue 111]], and [[!issue 100]]. We discussed the issues
+that weren't completed:
+
+* [[!issue 20]]: nothing has happened
+* [[!issue 74]]: MR in progress
+* [[!issue 96]]: warning, not error
+* [[!issue 101]]: Daniel has made a start on a template
+* [[!issue 102]]: we did not pair
+* [[!issue 107]]: Lars made a comment
+* [[!issue 108]]: Lars has worked on blocker
+* [[!issue 116]]: nothing has happened
+
+Daniel will file an issue to make it mandatory for codegen to be
+explicit about the template language.
+
+We had three outstanding merge requests, which Daniel will review later.
+
+We closed [[!milestone 17]] and created [[!milestone 17]], with issues
+
+* [[!issue 124]] – Daniel to investigate
+* [[!issue 123]] – Lars has existing code to base this on
+* [[!issue 122]] – Lars did it for Python, should be simple
+* [[!issue 108]] – Lars will keep chungging away at this
+* [[!issue 107]] – we agreed on an implementation approach
+* [[!issue 102]] – we will pair with Dan
+* [[!issue 101]] – Daniel will attempt a `tests/` approach to
+  start with
+* [[!issue 96]] and [[!issue 6]] – related, Lars will implement
+  warning/error collection and reporting
+* [[!issue 74]] – Lars has an MR for the Python template, but
+  doesn't want to do the Bash one
+* [[!issue 20]] – Lars and Daniel to schedule a discussion
+
+We filed [[!issue 125]] to track what we need to suggest others try
+Subplot.
+
+We discussed whether libraries provided by Subplot itself should
+implement the steps in all the languages supported by Subplot. We
+reached the consensus that it is a worthy goal, but not easy for now.
+We agree that the functionality should be available, but does not have
+to be identical. However, we'll wait for actual user needs before
+moving on this at all.
+
+# Actions
+
+* Daniel to file an issue about making codegen require an explicit
+  template declaration.
+* Daniel to review open merge requests from Lars.
+* Lars and Daniel to schedule a discussion about running scenarios
+  conditionally.