From 3c327e933eb5b9b9333bf5db67eabdcddd7e7a09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Wirzenius Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 19:42:52 +0300 Subject: Publish log entry --- .../08/01/iteration_planning_note_august_1.mdwn | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) create mode 100644 blog/2020/08/01/iteration_planning_note_august_1.mdwn diff --git a/blog/2020/08/01/iteration_planning_note_august_1.mdwn b/blog/2020/08/01/iteration_planning_note_august_1.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000..aeeb6c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/blog/2020/08/01/iteration_planning_note_august_1.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +[[!meta title="Iteration planning note: August 1"]] +[[!tag meeting]] +[[!meta date="2020-08-01 19:25"]] + +# What has happened? + +* This past iteration was [[!milestone 11]]. It had three issues + assigned: [[!issue 20]], [[!issue 62]], and [[!issue 69]]. We + completed one (62), but got little work done on the other two. + +* Lars points out that he dragged his feet on 69, because it's likely + to cause merge conflicts for Daniel's work on 20. Daniel said that's + OK. Lars suggested we try avoid in the future picking tasks that are + likely to touch the same part of the code. Daniel agreed and said + that splitting up big code modules will help with that. + +* There were no outstanding merge requests, nor any unmerged or stale + branches. + +* We reviewed issues that had been updated after the previous meeting. + + - [[!issue 36]]: Lars added a link to the Tufte CSS styling, but + said it's not something we should work on at this time. + - [[!issue 73]], [[!issue 27]], and [[!issue 53]]: These don't seem + urgent enough to include in this iteration. + - [[!issue 72]] and [[!issue 71]]: added the `mentor` label. + - [[!issue 70]]: Daniel likes the suggestion of using footnotes for + the URL. We discussed whether we should do that for HTML as well, + but left it open for now. Added the `helpwanted` and `mentor` + labels, but not `easy` since it doesn't seem easy. + - [[!issue 58]]: We're still at an impasse on knowing what the right + thing to do here is. We added a comment to note what the stumbling + block is, for the future. + - [[!issue 27]]: Doesn't seem urgent enough to include in this + iteration. + +* The new iteration ([[!milestone 12]]) will have two issues carried + over from the previous iteration. + + - [[!issue 20]] + - [[!issue 69]] + +* We discussed what's needed for us to want to suggest to others to + try Subplot for real. Our general feeling is that once at least one + of us has used Subplot for a real project, and we've dealt with any + sharp corners we've found, we can ask others to do try Subplot. + + The current plan is for Lars to use Subplot for ewww, his web server + for static content. Once ewww is in real use, we'll consider the + situation. + + We will, however, revisit this question every iteration planning + meeting. + +# Actions + +* Lars to write these notes. -- cgit v1.2.1