From a52427f48f57ca8da5b797a6e56c3735cf375b60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Wirzenius Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:44:34 +0300 Subject: Publish log entry --- .../08/30/iteration_planning_note_august_29.mdwn | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) create mode 100644 blog/2020/08/30/iteration_planning_note_august_29.mdwn diff --git a/blog/2020/08/30/iteration_planning_note_august_29.mdwn b/blog/2020/08/30/iteration_planning_note_august_29.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c76f13f --- /dev/null +++ b/blog/2020/08/30/iteration_planning_note_august_29.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +[[!meta title="Iteration planning note: August 29"]] +[[!tag meeting]] +[[!meta date="2020-08-30 12:34"]] + +# What has happened? + +We extended [[!milestone 12]] due to life events. We made some +progress, but didn't finish either of the two tasks that were assigned +to the iteration. + +# Review + +We had not MRs or branches to review. We reviewed all issues, picking +a few for the new iteration. + +The new iteration [[!milestone 13]] has three assigned issues: + +* Daniel: [[!issue 20]] +* Lars: [[!issue 65]] +* Lars: [[!issue 70]] +* Lars: [[!issue 81]] + +There's a few extra ones that should be very quick, in case we have +time. + +# Discussion + +We discussed briefly what we need before we can start inviting others +to try Subplot for real. At this point, we can think of two things: +better documentation for Subplot itself, aimed at stakeholders in +projects using Subplot, and better testing of Subplot against +accidental breakage. + +For the testing, we'll set up a set of chosen projects that use +Subplot, and run their subplots at least once per Subplot iteration. +The goal is to make breaking changes consciously, not accidentally. + +We also discussed making merge reviews quicker. The consensus is that +we should ping each other repeatedly if there's reviews. + +# Actions + +Lars to write these meeting minutes. -- cgit v1.2.1