From b86911e54764c28f802d495fb80b8683fc20be29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Silverstone Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 17:00:11 +0100 Subject: Add iteration note for today Signed-off-by: Daniel Silverstone --- .../06/06/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) create mode 100644 blog/2020/06/06/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn diff --git a/blog/2020/06/06/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn b/blog/2020/06/06/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b287237 --- /dev/null +++ b/blog/2020/06/06/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +[[!meta title="Iteration planning note: June 20"]] +[[!tag meeting]] +[[!meta date="2020-06-20 18:00"]] + +# What has happened? + +- We got quite a bit done, but not everything yet. +- Daniel has pushed an MR for issue 12 but Lars hasn't had time to + go over it until next iteration. +- We're not making rapid progress, but we're both very busy with other things + right now and that's fine. + +So we have: + +- One outstanding MR ([[!mr 54]]) +- One untackled issue ([[!issue 20]]) +- No branches which need cleaning up + +# Issue review + +We reviewed the situation for all the open issues, for the most part nothing +was changed, however the following tweaks were done: + +- We added the `typesetting` label to [[!issue 27]] +- Lars made a note in [[!issue 48]] that we're letting multiple binding/function + files bed-in before we try making any more decisions about libraries. +- We discussed [[!issue 62]] because Lars had made some comments: + - We think 'integral commits' is a good way to say what we mean. + - We're not going to mandate 'conventional commits' + - Lars labelled it active-discussion + - We removed it from the iteration. +- Added `actively-discussed` label to [[!issue 65]] + +We agreed to continue with our current issue-filing and closing/keeping flow +the same for now. + +# Milestone planning + +[[!milestone 10]] has two issues in it, both assigned to Daniel. Lars needs +to review [[!mr 54]] which is for [[!issue 12]], and Daniel needs to write an MR +for [[!issue 20]]. + +# Mainline branch name + +Daniel was concerned that we might be virtue signalling, but also acknowledges +that he's not sure it's not worth it. We're happy to make the change, though +we don't think it's high priority necessarily. OTOH subplot doesn't have a huge +number of collaborators, so a change now would be low cost. + +Daniel created [[!issue 68]] assigned it to himself and put it into the milestone. + +# Actions + +- Lars to review [[!mr 54]] +- Daniel to work on a solution for [[!issue 20]] -- cgit v1.2.1