From f188aa27716d8ea5c723304eabccca4e773042bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Silverstone Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 17:22:12 +0100 Subject: Rename planning note from june Signed-off-by: Daniel Silverstone --- .../06/06/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn | 55 ---------------------- .../06/20/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 blog/2020/06/06/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn create mode 100644 blog/2020/06/20/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn diff --git a/blog/2020/06/06/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn b/blog/2020/06/06/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn deleted file mode 100644 index b287237..0000000 --- a/blog/2020/06/06/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn +++ /dev/null @@ -1,55 +0,0 @@ -[[!meta title="Iteration planning note: June 20"]] -[[!tag meeting]] -[[!meta date="2020-06-20 18:00"]] - -# What has happened? - -- We got quite a bit done, but not everything yet. -- Daniel has pushed an MR for issue 12 but Lars hasn't had time to - go over it until next iteration. -- We're not making rapid progress, but we're both very busy with other things - right now and that's fine. - -So we have: - -- One outstanding MR ([[!mr 54]]) -- One untackled issue ([[!issue 20]]) -- No branches which need cleaning up - -# Issue review - -We reviewed the situation for all the open issues, for the most part nothing -was changed, however the following tweaks were done: - -- We added the `typesetting` label to [[!issue 27]] -- Lars made a note in [[!issue 48]] that we're letting multiple binding/function - files bed-in before we try making any more decisions about libraries. -- We discussed [[!issue 62]] because Lars had made some comments: - - We think 'integral commits' is a good way to say what we mean. - - We're not going to mandate 'conventional commits' - - Lars labelled it active-discussion - - We removed it from the iteration. -- Added `actively-discussed` label to [[!issue 65]] - -We agreed to continue with our current issue-filing and closing/keeping flow -the same for now. - -# Milestone planning - -[[!milestone 10]] has two issues in it, both assigned to Daniel. Lars needs -to review [[!mr 54]] which is for [[!issue 12]], and Daniel needs to write an MR -for [[!issue 20]]. - -# Mainline branch name - -Daniel was concerned that we might be virtue signalling, but also acknowledges -that he's not sure it's not worth it. We're happy to make the change, though -we don't think it's high priority necessarily. OTOH subplot doesn't have a huge -number of collaborators, so a change now would be low cost. - -Daniel created [[!issue 68]] assigned it to himself and put it into the milestone. - -# Actions - -- Lars to review [[!mr 54]] -- Daniel to work on a solution for [[!issue 20]] diff --git a/blog/2020/06/20/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn b/blog/2020/06/20/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b287237 --- /dev/null +++ b/blog/2020/06/20/iteration_planning_note_june_20.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +[[!meta title="Iteration planning note: June 20"]] +[[!tag meeting]] +[[!meta date="2020-06-20 18:00"]] + +# What has happened? + +- We got quite a bit done, but not everything yet. +- Daniel has pushed an MR for issue 12 but Lars hasn't had time to + go over it until next iteration. +- We're not making rapid progress, but we're both very busy with other things + right now and that's fine. + +So we have: + +- One outstanding MR ([[!mr 54]]) +- One untackled issue ([[!issue 20]]) +- No branches which need cleaning up + +# Issue review + +We reviewed the situation for all the open issues, for the most part nothing +was changed, however the following tweaks were done: + +- We added the `typesetting` label to [[!issue 27]] +- Lars made a note in [[!issue 48]] that we're letting multiple binding/function + files bed-in before we try making any more decisions about libraries. +- We discussed [[!issue 62]] because Lars had made some comments: + - We think 'integral commits' is a good way to say what we mean. + - We're not going to mandate 'conventional commits' + - Lars labelled it active-discussion + - We removed it from the iteration. +- Added `actively-discussed` label to [[!issue 65]] + +We agreed to continue with our current issue-filing and closing/keeping flow +the same for now. + +# Milestone planning + +[[!milestone 10]] has two issues in it, both assigned to Daniel. Lars needs +to review [[!mr 54]] which is for [[!issue 12]], and Daniel needs to write an MR +for [[!issue 20]]. + +# Mainline branch name + +Daniel was concerned that we might be virtue signalling, but also acknowledges +that he's not sure it's not worth it. We're happy to make the change, though +we don't think it's high priority necessarily. OTOH subplot doesn't have a huge +number of collaborators, so a change now would be low cost. + +Daniel created [[!issue 68]] assigned it to himself and put it into the milestone. + +# Actions + +- Lars to review [[!mr 54]] +- Daniel to work on a solution for [[!issue 20]] -- cgit v1.2.1