From 6b5e6b9de1838eff80981c85c2af095ff51435bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Wirzenius Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:53:31 +0200 Subject: Add: success criteria for Subplot --- success.mdwn | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) create mode 100644 success.mdwn (limited to 'success.mdwn') diff --git a/success.mdwn b/success.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bccad44 --- /dev/null +++ b/success.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +[[!meta title="Definition of success"]] + +When do we consider Subplot to be a successful project? + +* **Don't worry, be happy:** Subplot replaces yarn for all use use for + Lars and Daniel. Lars can retire the yarn program entirely, meaning + it can be removed from Debian and Lars can drop it from the git repo + for cmdtest. This is the minimum that we want to achieve, and if we + get this, we're perfectly satisfied. Everything else is ego + stroking. + +* **Killing me softly:** At least three separate projects use Subplot + successfully. It's OK if Lars or Daniel are involved with the + projects, but the Subplot should be primarily written by others. We + get at least one patch for Subplot from an outsider. + +* **I hate myself for loving you:** At least five projects use + Subplot, and neither Lars nor Daniel nor their employers are + directly involved in those projects. We get at least one bug report + or patch per month for six months. + +* **R.E.S.P.E.C.T.:** Subplot is mentioned favourably on Hacker News + at least once, and we hear of new projects who use Subplot at least + once per month for six months. + +* **Goodness gracious me:** LWN writes a front-page article on Subplot. + +(This is a little tongue in cheek.) -- cgit v1.2.1