blob: bccad44a1390787f961f645493f5caef72e4470c (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
|
[[!meta title="Definition of success"]]
When do we consider Subplot to be a successful project?
* **Don't worry, be happy:** Subplot replaces yarn for all use use for
Lars and Daniel. Lars can retire the yarn program entirely, meaning
it can be removed from Debian and Lars can drop it from the git repo
for cmdtest. This is the minimum that we want to achieve, and if we
get this, we're perfectly satisfied. Everything else is ego
stroking.
* **Killing me softly:** At least three separate projects use Subplot
successfully. It's OK if Lars or Daniel are involved with the
projects, but the Subplot should be primarily written by others. We
get at least one patch for Subplot from an outsider.
* **I hate myself for loving you:** At least five projects use
Subplot, and neither Lars nor Daniel nor their employers are
directly involved in those projects. We get at least one bug report
or patch per month for six months.
* **R.E.S.P.E.C.T.:** Subplot is mentioned favourably on Hacker News
at least once, and we hear of new projects who use Subplot at least
once per month for six months.
* **Goodness gracious me:** LWN writes a front-page article on Subplot.
(This is a little tongue in cheek.)
|
