diff options
author | distix ticketing system <distix@pieni.net> | 2018-04-04 07:06:03 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | distix ticketing system <distix@pieni.net> | 2018-04-04 07:06:03 +0000 |
commit | 1207c0a5a2f341528c678aad1b5413d3896e0935 (patch) | |
tree | fdfdffc19fb194be1dfb007eab149f190f4ca8c0 /tickets | |
parent | 5d5fc452fa74f92c0f2a3ac8b70ba86671015259 (diff) | |
download | ick-devel-distix-1207c0a5a2f341528c678aad1b5413d3896e0935.tar.gz |
imported mails
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets')
-rw-r--r-- | tickets/4bbc9995f89d40c59451b743be4a4811/Maildir/new/1522825563.M703234P18571Q1.koom | 91 |
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/4bbc9995f89d40c59451b743be4a4811/Maildir/new/1522825563.M703234P18571Q1.koom b/tickets/4bbc9995f89d40c59451b743be4a4811/Maildir/new/1522825563.M703234P18571Q1.koom new file mode 100644 index 0000000..df8dcef --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/4bbc9995f89d40c59451b743be4a4811/Maildir/new/1522825563.M703234P18571Q1.koom @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +Return-Path: <ick-discuss-bounces@ick.liw.fi> +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net (yaffle.pepperfish.net [88.99.213.221])
+ by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 296A34352E
+ for <distix@pieni.net>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 07:05:13 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.101.20])
+ by yaffle.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0059841833
+ for <distix@pieni.net>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:05:12 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost.nat ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1f3cTo-00026T-UB; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:05:12 +0100 +Received: from [10.112.101.21] (helo=mx3.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1f3cTn-00026H-J9
+ for <ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi>; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:05:11 +0100 +Received: from mail.steve.org.uk ([176.9.183.102] helo=ssh.steve.org.uk)
+ by mx3.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
+ (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <steve@steve.org.uk>) id 1f3cTh-0004GU-RB
+ for ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:05:11 +0100 +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=steve.org.uk; s=20150726; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:
+ From:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:
+ Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:
+ Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:
+ List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
+ bh=+E8DO97vDlmdAjEO02Ga+uX5auSvp6hrfFENP1uIZA0=; b=A65MaIc1mYkZ3zTc0ZtR5joWZ
+ 5wmY8teuSBbL+fbU6EWJ5kBJk5qqrumbnAzq/iUdNzLmNuUEu3vIkg4FsR3donX2CfXJoQKEtP+lG
+ zBj0dln0oFFoM63FO5a1HZS8sxgy49eENL7COdBox6ZJ1aq2aKSp37K9nTYnqls7wUR3A=; +Received: from steve by ssh.steve.org.uk with local (Exim 4.89)
+ (envelope-from <steve@steve.org.uk>) id 1f3cTb-0005D6-7D
+ for ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 07:04:59 +0000 +To: ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi +Cc: +From: Steve Kemp <steve@steve.org.uk> +Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 07:04:08 +0000 +Message-ID: <1522825448.19550.2@ssh.steve.org.uk> +In-Reply-To: <1522602115.2971.20.camel@liw.fi> +References: <1522571699.2971.5.camel@liw.fi> <1522602115.2971.20.camel@liw.fi> +X-added-header: steve.org.uk +X-Pepperfish-Transaction: fbc1-0e50-e856-066f +X-Spam-Score: 2.4 +X-Spam-Score-int: 24 +X-Spam-Bar: ++ +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:05:11 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (2.4 points)
+ pts rule name description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ 2.5 PPF_GTLD_LONG Long gTLD, probably cheap throw-away domain
+ -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain
+ -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20%
+ [score: 0.0740]
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
+ domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: 11e4c38c8ca4deb9e992fad241274745 +Subject: Re: What's needed before ick is ready for others to use? +X-BeenThere: ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: discussions about the ick CI system <ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi>,
+ <mailto:ick-discuss-request@ick.liw.fi?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi> +List-Post: <mailto:ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi> +List-Help: <mailto:ick-discuss-request@ick.liw.fi?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi>,
+ <mailto:ick-discuss-request@ick.liw.fi?subject=subscribe> +Sender: ick-discuss-bounces@ick.liw.fi +Errors-To: ick-discuss-bounces@ick.liw.fi + +> I've collected my thoughts, and Steve's feedback, into a roadmap:
+>
+> http://ick.liw.fi/roadmap/
+>
+> Does that look sane?
+
+ Yes, it does look sane.
+
+Steve
+--
+https://www.steve.org.uk/
+
+_______________________________________________
+ick-discuss mailing list
+ick-discuss@ick.liw.fi
+https://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ick-discuss-ick.liw.fi
|