imported mails

11 files changed, 917 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/cur/.this-dir-not-empty/.empty/empty-file b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/cur/.this-dir-not-empty/.empty/empty-file
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e69de29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/cur/.this-dir-not-empty/.empty/empty-file
diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/.this-dir-not-empty/.empty/empty-file b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/.this-dir-not-empty/.empty/empty-file
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e69de29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/.this-dir-not-empty/.empty/empty-file
diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455998995.M487086P17339Q32.exolobe1 b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455998995.M487086P17339Q32.exolobe1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b7af8a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455998995.M487086P17339Q32.exolobe1
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E312C7D3
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:19:21 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FE5335C;
+	Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:19:20 +0000 (GMT)
+Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1YRl2u-000504-By; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:19:20 +0000
+Received: from inmail ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1YRl2t-0004zg-0U
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:19:19 +0000
+Received: from xvm-166-37.ghst.net
+ ([95.142.166.37] helo=pieni.net ident=postfix)
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <liw@liw.fi>) id 1YRl2q-00089B-P5
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:19:18 +0000
+Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (82-181-8-107.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.181.8.107])
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 854122C7CF
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:19:14 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by exolobe1.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA15541329
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:17:42 +0200 (EET)
+Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:17:41 +0200
+From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+Message-ID: <20150228171741.GE2140@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+References: <CAF+2JmFJr8WUebk=ipNSgd7ArnVUq_borOs9LmJjM8qmWweaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: inline
+In-Reply-To: <CAF+2JmFJr8WUebk=ipNSgd7ArnVUq_borOs9LmJjM8qmWweaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
+X-Spam-Score: -3.4
+X-Spam-Score-int: -33
+X-Spam-Bar: ---
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:19:18 +0000
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.4 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT    User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
+ tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+Subject: Re: workflow
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 05:46:39PM +0100, Thomas Waldmann wrote:
+> Is there some special reason why there is no normal issue tracker, why one
+> can not just issue normal pull requests? You could e.g. have a github
+> organisation for all obnam related stuff and public gh repos, issue
+> trackers, etc..
+
+Github is a proprietary service, implemented using non-free software.
+I am an advocate and developer of free software. Using Github to host
+my software would require compromising on my principles.
+
+> For me, just doing a pull request on github would be much easier than
+> extracting email content from git changesets and copy and pasting each of
+> them to this mailing list.
+
+>From the README:
+
+    If you make any changes, I welcome patches, either as plain diffs,
+    git format-patch --cover-letter mails, or public repositories I
+    can merge from.
+
+I don't mind merging from a repository on github. I prefer patches on
+the mailing list, however, since it's easier to respond to such
+patches if I have comments on them.
+
+I don't intend to deal with github pull requests, since as far as I
+know they require having a github account. Likewise, I don't want
+issues tracked on Github, either.
+
+-- 
+Happiness is a tested backup.
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455998995.M522905P17339Q34.exolobe1 b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455998995.M522905P17339Q34.exolobe1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b7af8a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455998995.M522905P17339Q34.exolobe1
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E312C7D3
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:19:21 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FE5335C;
+	Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:19:20 +0000 (GMT)
+Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1YRl2u-000504-By; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:19:20 +0000
+Received: from inmail ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1YRl2t-0004zg-0U
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:19:19 +0000
+Received: from xvm-166-37.ghst.net
+ ([95.142.166.37] helo=pieni.net ident=postfix)
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <liw@liw.fi>) id 1YRl2q-00089B-P5
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:19:18 +0000
+Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (82-181-8-107.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.181.8.107])
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 854122C7CF
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:19:14 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by exolobe1.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA15541329
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:17:42 +0200 (EET)
+Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:17:41 +0200
+From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+Message-ID: <20150228171741.GE2140@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+References: <CAF+2JmFJr8WUebk=ipNSgd7ArnVUq_borOs9LmJjM8qmWweaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: inline
+In-Reply-To: <CAF+2JmFJr8WUebk=ipNSgd7ArnVUq_borOs9LmJjM8qmWweaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
+X-Spam-Score: -3.4
+X-Spam-Score-int: -33
+X-Spam-Bar: ---
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:19:18 +0000
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.4 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT    User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
+ tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+Subject: Re: workflow
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 05:46:39PM +0100, Thomas Waldmann wrote:
+> Is there some special reason why there is no normal issue tracker, why one
+> can not just issue normal pull requests? You could e.g. have a github
+> organisation for all obnam related stuff and public gh repos, issue
+> trackers, etc..
+
+Github is a proprietary service, implemented using non-free software.
+I am an advocate and developer of free software. Using Github to host
+my software would require compromising on my principles.
+
+> For me, just doing a pull request on github would be much easier than
+> extracting email content from git changesets and copy and pasting each of
+> them to this mailing list.
+
+>From the README:
+
+    If you make any changes, I welcome patches, either as plain diffs,
+    git format-patch --cover-letter mails, or public repositories I
+    can merge from.
+
+I don't mind merging from a repository on github. I prefer patches on
+the mailing list, however, since it's easier to respond to such
+patches if I have comments on them.
+
+I don't intend to deal with github pull requests, since as far as I
+know they require having a github account. Likewise, I don't want
+issues tracked on Github, either.
+
+-- 
+Happiness is a tested backup.
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455998998.M596009P17339Q84.exolobe1 b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455998998.M596009P17339Q84.exolobe1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9353fe1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455998998.M596009P17339Q84.exolobe1
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07EB72C5B4
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:04:51 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF3133F3;
+	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:50 +0000 (GMT)
+Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1YRQDS-0001Dk-B7; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:50 +0000
+Received: from inmail ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1YRQDR-0001De-9M
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:49 +0000
+Received: from szepe.net ([95.140.33.67])
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <viktor@szepe.net>) id 1YRQDO-0003Y3-Vp
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:49 +0000
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 33)
+ by szepe.net with local; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:04:42 +0100
+ id 002415CD.54F0BFCA.000043AC
+Received: from 178-164-141-236.pool.digikabel.hu
+ (178-164-141-236.pool.digikabel.hu [178.164.141.236]) by szepe.net (Horde
+ Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:04:42 +0100
+Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:04:41 +0100
+Message-ID: <20150227200441.Horde.irjFjyf7WDRuU7Qzt9B5lg6@szepe.net>
+From: =?utf-8?b?U3rDqXBl?= Viktor <viktor@szepe.net>
+To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+References: <CAF+2JmFJr8WUebk=ipNSgd7ArnVUq_borOs9LmJjM8qmWweaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAF+2JmH-k7HfkbDMy7_Oa2641OPRCiekWaG6YmZ4pksqU=WsKQ@mail.gmail.com>
+In-Reply-To: <CAF+2JmH-k7HfkbDMy7_Oa2641OPRCiekWaG6YmZ4pksqU=WsKQ@mail.gmail.com>
+User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.1.7)
+Accept-Language: en,hu
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Disposition: inline
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+X-Spam-Score: -1.8
+X-Spam-Score-int: -17
+X-Spam-Bar: -
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:48 +0000
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.8 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ 0.5 PPF_RECEIVED_HTTP      Received header mentions http
+ -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
+ -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+ 0.1 PPF_SPLIT_TAG          RAW: Body contains a split HTML tag
+Subject: Re: workflow
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+Are these the two right commits?
+
+https://github.com/ThomasWaldmann/obnam/compare/e6a0e88...4b8f4d9
+
+
+Id=C3=A9zem/Quoting Thomas Waldmann <thomas.j.waldmann@gmail.com>:
+
+> https://github.com/ThomasWaldmann/obnam/commits/misc <- there it is, plea=
+se
+> review / pull.
+>
+> 2015-02-27 17:46 GMT+01:00 Thomas Waldmann <thomas.j.waldmann@gmail.com>:
+>
+>> MoinMoin! :)
+>>
+>> I'm new to obnam, but I find it pretty good yet, thanks to Lars for
+>> writing it!
+>>
+>> I used to use rsync+hardlinks method before, but as most here will know,
+>> that has its limitations and obnam seems to solve these. Also, as I like
+>> Python, I like software which I use to be in Python. :)
+>>
+>> As you've seen already from previous minor patches, I've started hacking
+>> on the code a little, currently mostly doing cleanup with all the stuff
+>> PyCharm code checker complains about.
+>>
+>> What I find a bit unusal here is that everything is going over the maili=
+ng
+>> list and static web site, so some stuff seems not as inviting as it coul=
+d
+>> be for new contributors or people who have just found a bug and want to
+>> quickly file it.
+>>
+>> Is there some special reason why there is no normal issue tracker, why o=
+ne
+>> can not just issue normal pull requests? You could e.g. have a github
+>> organisation for all obnam related stuff and public gh repos, issue
+>> trackers, etc..
+>>
+>> That does not need to be the primary / authoritative repo if you prefer =
+to
+>> self-host, but it could be some sort of mirror for easier collaboration.
+>>
+>> For me, just doing a pull request on github would be much easier than
+>> extracting email content from git changesets and copy and pasting each o=
+f
+>> them to this mailing list. Also, in case you find something that needs
+>> improvement while reviewing the changes, you could add feedback to each
+>> line of the pull request.
+>>
+>> Alternatively, could you just pull from a gh repo if somebody has some
+>> changesets for you?
+>>
+>> Cheers,
+>>
+>> Thomas
+>>
+
+
+Sz=C3=A9pe Viktor
+--=20
++36-20-4242498=20 sms@szepe.net  skype: szepe.viktor
+Budapest, XX. ker=C3=BClet
+
+
+
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999007.M980629P17339Q184.exolobe1 b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999007.M980629P17339Q184.exolobe1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..46c7a0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999007.M980629P17339Q184.exolobe1
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23A12C685
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:46:57 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A1E34FC;
+	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:46:57 +0000 (GMT)
+Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1YRO41-0001A3-3J; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:46:57 +0000
+Received: from inmail ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1YRO3z-00019w-Ek
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:46:55 +0000
+Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53])
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <thomas.j.waldmann@gmail.com>)
+ id 1YRO3t-0007uG-7Q
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:46:55 +0000
+Received: by paceu11 with SMTP id eu11so23881388pac.10
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:46:41 -0800 (PST)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
+ bh=fNCuCIptbEoqkG20Rv8u3lYm2l+Nu0CgHLxQfHkdsjY=;
+ b=iMluAJhS4e0kiFlty5r/1GweIq2DUQPYcNWC0ubf5gyVQXaMaWffcvcf35mzZYaDlm
+ BEv+IaO2mFddQWSXuozzYMjDK8u6KS9lNLbdeR96Lozi/Ps5ofUwUm4NSN8T1bJFa9dR
+ EZHVn6UXM0qrCxXjFw2Tw6SwnH0LyQOOLg2dLEWSuMkTqLH1JSWG5W71A1UaqhFU40dA
+ vdP6WznK1ZAiO75NhwT5+b1ogzDh3dq+tN9RG2Jrj32ppbTT2rZ5W7dt0RBPRAg+ffTa
+ 4Vb39CLOjATOex4umKtCpTIEgcpOIHlbtHlT2UcWfbmRCnm6Gu0OScvkR9fD1fytC+GV
+ 7QJg==
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Received: by 10.68.231.102 with SMTP id tf6mr25843993pbc.40.1425055600058;
+ Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:46:40 -0800 (PST)
+Received: by 10.66.185.45 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:46:39 -0800 (PST)
+Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:46:39 +0100
+Message-ID: <CAF+2JmFJr8WUebk=ipNSgd7ArnVUq_borOs9LmJjM8qmWweaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Thomas Waldmann <thomas.j.waldmann@gmail.com>
+To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Spam-Score: 1.7
+X-Spam-Score-int: 17
+X-Spam-Bar: +
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:46:55 +0000
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (1.7 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ 0.2 PPF_ALTERNATIVES       Body in multipart/alternative
+ 0.5 PPF_RECEIVED_HTTP      Received header mentions http
+ 1.0 SUBJ_NOSPACE           Subject has no spaces in it
+ 1.0 PPF_FROM_CONTAINS_MAIL The From header contains 'mail'
+ 1.2 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (thomas.j.waldmann[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
+ trust [209.85.220.53 listed in list.dnswl.org]
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+ 0.3 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
+ 0.2 PPF_NUMERIC_ENTITY     RAW: Body contains numeric HTML entities
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
+ domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+Subject: workflow
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7907293022790399222=="
+Mime-version: 1.0
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+--===============7907293022790399222==
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33ca8cd3a8250510149c13
+
+--047d7b33ca8cd3a8250510149c13
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+
+MoinMoin! :)
+
+I'm new to obnam, but I find it pretty good yet, thanks to Lars for writing
+it!
+
+I used to use rsync+hardlinks method before, but as most here will know,
+that has its limitations and obnam seems to solve these. Also, as I like
+Python, I like software which I use to be in Python. :)
+
+As you've seen already from previous minor patches, I've started hacking on
+the code a little, currently mostly doing cleanup with all the stuff
+PyCharm code checker complains about.
+
+What I find a bit unusal here is that everything is going over the mailing
+list and static web site, so some stuff seems not as inviting as it could
+be for new contributors or people who have just found a bug and want to
+quickly file it.
+
+Is there some special reason why there is no normal issue tracker, why one
+can not just issue normal pull requests? You could e.g. have a github
+organisation for all obnam related stuff and public gh repos, issue
+trackers, etc..
+
+That does not need to be the primary / authoritative repo if you prefer to
+self-host, but it could be some sort of mirror for easier collaboration.
+
+For me, just doing a pull request on github would be much easier than
+extracting email content from git changesets and copy and pasting each of
+them to this mailing list. Also, in case you find something that needs
+improvement while reviewing the changes, you could add feedback to each
+line of the pull request.
+
+Alternatively, could you just pull from a gh repo if somebody has some
+changesets for you?
+
+Cheers,
+
+Thomas
+
+--047d7b33ca8cd3a8250510149c13
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>MoinMoin! :)<br><br></d=
+iv>I&#39;m new to obnam, but I find it pretty good yet, thanks to Lars for =
+writing it!<br><br></div><div>I used to use rsync+hardlinks method before, =
+but as most here will know, that has its limitations and obnam seems to sol=
+ve these. Also, as I like Python, I like software which I use to be in Pyth=
+on. :)<br><br></div>As you&#39;ve seen already from previous minor patches,=
+ I&#39;ve started hacking on the code a little, currently mostly doing clea=
+nup with all the stuff PyCharm code checker complains about.<br><br></div>W=
+hat I find a bit unusal here is that everything is going over the mailing l=
+ist and static web site, so some stuff seems not as inviting as it could be=
+ for new contributors or people who have just found a bug and want to quick=
+ly file it.<br><br></div>Is there some special reason why there is no norma=
+l issue tracker, why one can not just issue normal pull requests? You could=
+ e.g. have a github organisation for all obnam related stuff and public gh =
+repos, issue trackers, etc..<br><br>That does not need to be the primary / =
+authoritative repo if you prefer to self-host, but it could be some sort of=
+ mirror for easier collaboration.<br><br></div>For me, just doing a pull re=
+quest on github would be much easier than extracting email content from git=
+ changesets and copy and pasting each of them to this mailing list. Also, i=
+n case you find something that needs improvement while reviewing the change=
+s, you could add feedback to each line of the pull request.<br><br></div><d=
+iv>Alternatively, could you just pull from a gh repo if somebody has some c=
+hangesets for you?<br><br></div>Cheers,<br><br></div>Thomas<br></div>
+
+--047d7b33ca8cd3a8250510149c13--
+
+
+--===============7907293022790399222==
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
+
+--===============7907293022790399222==--
+
diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999008.M184899P17339Q190.exolobe1 b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999008.M184899P17339Q190.exolobe1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e75b24f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999008.M184899P17339Q190.exolobe1
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416EC2C7D9
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:46:29 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBEA3616;
+	Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:46:28 +0000 (GMT)
+Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1YRlTA-0007Xb-Jq; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:46:28 +0000
+Received: from inmail ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1YRlT8-0007Ww-Vd
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:46:27 +0000
+Received: from xvm-166-37.ghst.net
+ ([95.142.166.37] helo=pieni.net ident=postfix)
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <liw@liw.fi>) id 1YRlT6-0000Yq-L9
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:46:26 +0000
+Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (82-181-8-107.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.181.8.107])
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D80742C72D
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:46:22 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by exolobe1.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70DCC41329
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:44:51 +0200 (EET)
+Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:44:50 +0200
+From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+Message-ID: <20150228174450.GF2140@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+References: <CAF+2JmFJr8WUebk=ipNSgd7ArnVUq_borOs9LmJjM8qmWweaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAF+2JmH-k7HfkbDMy7_Oa2641OPRCiekWaG6YmZ4pksqU=WsKQ@mail.gmail.com>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: inline
+In-Reply-To: <CAF+2JmH-k7HfkbDMy7_Oa2641OPRCiekWaG6YmZ4pksqU=WsKQ@mail.gmail.com>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
+X-Spam-Score: -3.3
+X-Spam-Score-int: -32
+X-Spam-Bar: ---
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:46:26 +0000
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.3 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT    User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
+ tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+ 0.1 PPF_SPLIT_TAG          RAW: Body contains a split HTML tag
+Subject: Re: workflow
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+First, please excuse me for being contrary and different from the
+mainstream. I do appreciate the patches you've already made, and I'm
+looking forward to more.
+
+On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 07:42:15PM +0100, Thomas Waldmann wrote:
+> https://github.com/ThomasWaldmann/obnam/commits/misc <- there it is, please
+> review / pull.
+
+That's a branch with many more changes. Without going through them in
+detail, I don't know what the purpose of the branch is. That's one of
+the really nice parts of "git format-patch --cover-letter": the first
+email gives a high level summary of the whole set of changes. Note
+that if you use the "git send-email" extension to git, you don't need
+to copy and paste the patches into emails.
+
+A quick, initial review after some browsing of the patches.
+
+Please use the Linus style of commit messages, even if I don't always
+manage to do so. The Linus style leads to better comprehension when I
+read others' commit messages, I find.
+
+Please also have clear summary lines in commit message: "improve
+setup.py" doesn't say how setup.py gets improved. (However, I don't
+want to duplicate information like that to yet another place, and I
+don't think the project build script is an appropriate place for
+project descriptions, so I don't want to put that into setup.py. It
+belongs in README, other documentation, and the webiste, which is
+quite enough duplicatieon already. Sorry about that: I know it's
+against what is common in the Python world.)
+
+When submitting a branch for review and merge, please avoid commits
+that undo changes you made earlier in the branch. It causes
+unnecessary work for the receipient. Rebase as needed.
+
+I don't want generic ignores in a project specific .gitignore file
+(the presence of *.swp should be considered a bug). If you use a
+specific IDE that likes to create its own files, please add that to a
+global .gitignore file for yourself.
+
+I didn't look at all the commits, but I'll happily do that if you
+clean up the branch, and submit it for review and merge again. In
+fact, I'm looking forward to it.
+
+-- 
+Happiness is a tested backup.
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999011.M124919P17339Q225.exolobe1 b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999011.M124919P17339Q225.exolobe1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6285458
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999011.M124919P17339Q225.exolobe1
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C70C323828
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon,  2 Mar 2015 07:42:56 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1F633A7;
+	Mon,  2 Mar 2015 06:42:56 +0000 (GMT)
+Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1YSK48-0001wu-8s; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:42:56 +0000
+Received: from inmail ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1YSK46-0001wo-Jl
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:42:54 +0000
+Received: from xvm-166-37.ghst.net
+ ([95.142.166.37] helo=pieni.net ident=postfix)
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <liw@liw.fi>) id 1YSK44-0005mv-R1
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:42:54 +0000
+Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (82-181-8-107.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.181.8.107])
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CDA723828
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon,  2 Mar 2015 07:42:51 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by exolobe1.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964E74111F
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon,  2 Mar 2015 08:41:18 +0200 (EET)
+Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 08:41:17 +0200
+From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+Message-ID: <20150302064117.GS2140@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+References: <CAF+2JmFJr8WUebk=ipNSgd7ArnVUq_borOs9LmJjM8qmWweaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAF+2JmH-k7HfkbDMy7_Oa2641OPRCiekWaG6YmZ4pksqU=WsKQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <20150228174450.GF2140@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: inline
+In-Reply-To: <20150228174450.GF2140@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
+X-Spam-Score: -3.4
+X-Spam-Score-int: -33
+X-Spam-Bar: ---
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:42:54 +0000
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.4 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT    User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
+ tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+Subject: Re: workflow
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 07:44:50PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
+> I don't want generic ignores in a project specific .gitignore file
+> (the presence of *.swp should be considered a bug).
+
+To clarify: .gitignore already had *.swp, added by someone else
+(probably me), and wasn't added by Thomas.
+
+-- 
+Happiness is a tested backup.
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999011.M86026P17339Q224.exolobe1 b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999011.M86026P17339Q224.exolobe1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..625933f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/new/1455999011.M86026P17339Q224.exolobe1
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5E7E2C5BA
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:42:27 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3175B342D;
+	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:42:27 +0000 (GMT)
+Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1YRPrn-0008RU-38; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:42:27 +0000
+Received: from inmail ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1YRPrl-0008RN-AA
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:42:25 +0000
+Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47])
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <thomas.j.waldmann@gmail.com>)
+ id 1YRPri-0002wT-Md
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:42:25 +0000
+Received: by pabli10 with SMTP id li10so8642673pab.0
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:42:15 -0800 (PST)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
+ :content-type; bh=m8OTjNG20nws5N1SHCseqZxZYpvx/gAYeBFdU6qNEWM=;
+ b=g5vDVIinTZ+aOoQ9tZyBmSxau7Ol0/XJ7rg17l58kg+M0nnGHu5FO63LYUSQNhKRAU
+ D96dTywyBLYQZfTH7u6bxrJU0hC+g9pCxXGkQj7sQzi6Q4+A3EfTAP1c5RixywYhcSKU
+ hKQ0e9MDAJYe57zFF8gE8ZmvAEfBGXZqs69c/G0/NKdOnYWJLog2qTOjt7e0hKmd/EVg
+ bt8DlV2Gfxbm77wPPkfYFtZi1mloGJgLrk+XyWOfyXTWE3p2Xi3P3EqFKZfdt2ROoDLs
+ 9c2o1Vq59s78LZZn6qGhTxn9be7IBi7wVYw6RCEHMUnebTjIQAogeqSNCUCbQIM7YRS2
+ mibw==
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Received: by 10.66.124.129 with SMTP id mi1mr26010005pab.21.1425062535067;
+ Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:42:15 -0800 (PST)
+Received: by 10.66.185.45 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:42:15 -0800 (PST)
+In-Reply-To: <CAF+2JmFJr8WUebk=ipNSgd7ArnVUq_borOs9LmJjM8qmWweaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CAF+2JmFJr8WUebk=ipNSgd7ArnVUq_borOs9LmJjM8qmWweaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:42:15 +0100
+Message-ID: <CAF+2JmH-k7HfkbDMy7_Oa2641OPRCiekWaG6YmZ4pksqU=WsKQ@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Thomas Waldmann <thomas.j.waldmann@gmail.com>
+To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Spam-Score: 1.8
+X-Spam-Score-int: 18
+X-Spam-Bar: +
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:42:25 +0000
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (1.8 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ 0.2 PPF_ALTERNATIVES       Body in multipart/alternative
+ 0.5 PPF_RECEIVED_HTTP      Received header mentions http
+ 1.0 PPF_FROM_CONTAINS_MAIL The From header contains 'mail'
+ 1.2 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (thomas.j.waldmann[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
+ trust [209.85.220.47 listed in list.dnswl.org]
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+ 0.3 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
+ 0.2 PPF_NUMERIC_ENTITY     RAW: Body contains numeric HTML entities
+ 1.0 PPF_BLANK              RAW: Body contains _blank
+ 0.1 PPF_SPLIT_TAG          RAW: Body contains a split HTML tag
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
+ domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+Subject: Re: workflow
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4281109057992437736=="
+Mime-version: 1.0
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+--===============4281109057992437736==
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113441b02f7ddc0510163a38
+
+--001a113441b02f7ddc0510163a38
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+
+https://github.com/ThomasWaldmann/obnam/commits/misc <- there it is, please
+review / pull.
+
+2015-02-27 17:46 GMT+01:00 Thomas Waldmann <thomas.j.waldmann@gmail.com>:
+
+> MoinMoin! :)
+>
+> I'm new to obnam, but I find it pretty good yet, thanks to Lars for
+> writing it!
+>
+> I used to use rsync+hardlinks method before, but as most here will know,
+> that has its limitations and obnam seems to solve these. Also, as I like
+> Python, I like software which I use to be in Python. :)
+>
+> As you've seen already from previous minor patches, I've started hacking
+> on the code a little, currently mostly doing cleanup with all the stuff
+> PyCharm code checker complains about.
+>
+> What I find a bit unusal here is that everything is going over the mailing
+> list and static web site, so some stuff seems not as inviting as it could
+> be for new contributors or people who have just found a bug and want to
+> quickly file it.
+>
+> Is there some special reason why there is no normal issue tracker, why one
+> can not just issue normal pull requests? You could e.g. have a github
+> organisation for all obnam related stuff and public gh repos, issue
+> trackers, etc..
+>
+> That does not need to be the primary / authoritative repo if you prefer to
+> self-host, but it could be some sort of mirror for easier collaboration.
+>
+> For me, just doing a pull request on github would be much easier than
+> extracting email content from git changesets and copy and pasting each of
+> them to this mailing list. Also, in case you find something that needs
+> improvement while reviewing the changes, you could add feedback to each
+> line of the pull request.
+>
+> Alternatively, could you just pull from a gh repo if somebody has some
+> changesets for you?
+>
+> Cheers,
+>
+> Thomas
+>
+
+--001a113441b02f7ddc0510163a38
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<div dir=3D"ltr"><a href=3D"https://github.com/ThomasWaldmann/obnam/commits=
+/misc">https://github.com/ThomasWaldmann/obnam/commits/misc</a> &lt;- there=
+ it is, please review / pull.<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div =
+class=3D"gmail_quote">2015-02-27 17:46 GMT+01:00 Thomas Waldmann <span dir=
+=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:thomas.j.waldmann@gmail.com" target=3D"_blan=
+k">thomas.j.waldmann@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmai=
+l_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left=
+:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>MoinMoin! :)<br><=
+br></div>I&#39;m new to obnam, but I find it pretty good yet, thanks to Lar=
+s for writing it!<br><br></div><div>I used to use rsync+hardlinks method be=
+fore, but as most here will know, that has its limitations and obnam seems =
+to solve these. Also, as I like Python, I like software which I use to be i=
+n Python. :)<br><br></div>As you&#39;ve seen already from previous minor pa=
+tches, I&#39;ve started hacking on the code a little, currently mostly doin=
+g cleanup with all the stuff PyCharm code checker complains about.<br><br><=
+/div>What I find a bit unusal here is that everything is going over the mai=
+ling list and static web site, so some stuff seems not as inviting as it co=
+uld be for new contributors or people who have just found a bug and want to=
+ quickly file it.<br><br></div>Is there some special reason why there is no=
+ normal issue tracker, why one can not just issue normal pull requests? You=
+ could e.g. have a github organisation for all obnam related stuff and publ=
+ic gh repos, issue trackers, etc..<br><br>That does not need to be the prim=
+ary / authoritative repo if you prefer to self-host, but it could be some s=
+ort of mirror for easier collaboration.<br><br></div>For me, just doing a p=
+ull request on github would be much easier than extracting email content fr=
+om git changesets and copy and pasting each of them to this mailing list. A=
+lso, in case you find something that needs improvement while reviewing the =
+changes, you could add feedback to each line of the pull request.<br><br></=
+div><div>Alternatively, could you just pull from a gh repo if somebody has =
+some changesets for you?<br><br></div>Cheers,<br><br></div>Thomas<br></div>
+</blockquote></div><br></div>
+
+--001a113441b02f7ddc0510163a38--
+
+
+--===============4281109057992437736==
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
+
+--===============4281109057992437736==--
+
diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/tmp/.this-dir-not-empty/.empty/empty-file b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/tmp/.this-dir-not-empty/.empty/empty-file
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e69de29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/Maildir/tmp/.this-dir-not-empty/.empty/empty-file
diff --git a/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/ticket.yaml b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/ticket.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d3b00b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f/ticket.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+ticket-id:
+- a674cead16d34c9db90bd08f01f9556f
+title:
+- 'Re: workflow'