imported mails

1 files changed, 85 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tickets/cb75a21b4a874f86ba49e06ae8d887fc/Maildir/new/1466369705.M888813P12517Q1.hrun b/tickets/cb75a21b4a874f86ba49e06ae8d887fc/Maildir/new/1466369705.M888813P12517Q1.hrun
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..61bb51d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/cb75a21b4a874f86ba49e06ae8d887fc/Maildir/new/1466369705.M888813P12517Q1.hrun
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0779820F8A
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 22:54:04 +0200 (CEST)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AF05BC;
+	Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:54:03 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1bEjjH-00032r-Al; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:54:03 +0100
+Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1bEjjF-00032d-Nq; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:54:01 +0100
+Received: from antipoul.fr ([82.236.122.228])
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <adrien@antipoul.fr>)
+ id 1bEjjD-0001sT-GN; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:54:01 +0100
+Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e35:2ec7:ae40:21f:d0ff:fe80:127d]
+ (complexe.home.antipoul.fr [IPv6:2a01:e35:2ec7:ae40:21f:d0ff:fe80:127d])
+ by antipoul.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3CFDE60106;
+ Sun, 19 Jun 2016 22:53:40 +0200 (CEST)
+X-Warning: Your email may have been intercepted by French government. Please
+ use its content with care.
+To: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>, obnam-support@obnam.org,
+ obnam-dev@obnam.org
+References: <20160619083904.GA18768@orbis-terrarum.net>
+From: Adrien CLERC <adrien@antipoul.fr>
+Message-ID: <bfb55cce-243c-2d4a-4dfe-3600fed3237a@antipoul.fr>
+Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 22:53:37 +0200
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
+ Icedove/45.1.0
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+In-Reply-To: <20160619083904.GA18768@orbis-terrarum.net>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+X-Spam-Score: -3.4
+X-Spam-Score-int: -33
+X-Spam-Bar: ---
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:54:01 +0100
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.4 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ 0.4 PPF_WINDOWS_CHARSET    Content-Type is in a Windows-* charset
+ -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -1.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: be3d6c58240d9afaeb8079a9be499bec
+Subject: Re: [1/2] GPG & performance: a deep-dive
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+Le 19/06/2016 à 10:39, Robin H. Johnson a écrit :
+> - Plan for moving to PyCrypto or other for symmetric crypto
+I totally understand the goal, and can only support you. However,
+PyCrypto is not compatible with PyPy, as 'Cryptography' is. That's why
+paramiko did the switch recently (http://www.paramiko.org/changelog.html).
+Based on https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/pull/394 it seems that the
+switch is better on every aspect. Do you have the time to inspect this
+solution?
+
+Adrien
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org