diff options
author | Distix listener <distix@pieni.net> | 2016-10-31 02:05:09 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Distix listener <distix@pieni.net> | 2016-10-31 02:05:09 +0100 |
commit | 46578e42272ea455697b8aa4a0e076ac54d02319 (patch) | |
tree | 8fbde09dc3f12aa0c70e4a64ece38a9e3fb6740e /tickets | |
parent | 6fb2ed4e6dd40010fcc03c1227735cd606e42c3d (diff) | |
download | obnam-dev-distix-46578e42272ea455697b8aa4a0e076ac54d02319.tar.gz |
imported mails
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets')
-rw-r--r-- | tickets/8b02a339d62345ee9a0847fa0015d406/Maildir/new/1477875909.M365597P3015Q1.hrun | 171 |
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/8b02a339d62345ee9a0847fa0015d406/Maildir/new/1477875909.M365597P3015Q1.hrun b/tickets/8b02a339d62345ee9a0847fa0015d406/Maildir/new/1477875909.M365597P3015Q1.hrun new file mode 100644 index 0000000..365c7a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/8b02a339d62345ee9a0847fa0015d406/Maildir/new/1477875909.M365597P3015Q1.hrun @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ +Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org> +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC48D22631 + for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:02:46 +0100 (CET) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3455C1; + Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:02:46 +0000 (GMT) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1c10zu-000621-EE; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:02:46 +0000 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1c10zs-00061p-PH + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:02:44 +0000 +Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <remirampin@gmail.com>) + id 1c10zq-00071l-NA + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:02:44 +0000 +Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id o68so147087016qkf.3 + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:02:37 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to + :cc; bh=IWIgNhQ8mBSZv4Rqscz9eAB4F08e3N7pJx25Gwpky1I=; + b=w2UA05CgjvM8rXSwi9Gs7uGyE7iD2OLUUp2X4tjweULCtvrIIrPHMhjKhniHa4JjJu + N9O2XLJB2GFKX205OQOECGwhNVJhFqAc6A3UpGqNF79eFvAyBGOxPp7fk/XfS1NVaPfN + 8OUGmSBDoYNKa1FV5gs8LgVYekfF6Qh9gTW5V2CIGZoEgCZWnwDd1O4E1TeZH8g8sVai + FdTYsJEXLKHVhkc4eSwKe1V8FGd2m4LErEegd8mC4dERE9N6cZyXfUmhfS8oTcAshumc + n6PaJdTJqlRBIDqr5uT+IbAON62EsBJKkYLblM/OFNSfV7cZ5Y9MGl/WEYRxGgLT9Dr3 + wJWg== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20130820; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date + :message-id:subject:to:cc; + bh=IWIgNhQ8mBSZv4Rqscz9eAB4F08e3N7pJx25Gwpky1I=; + b=k0I/x5mDyXczZ5xJ6Ck6hh/KRqHRA5D2D92xXEAJLgdNruCuzkW3Dj7aVv7f6nykYY + P/hcvZgSp2g4jni6O9tb/YfyeqkksfzpXm8rc1iW74WRcviHJ8OOY4Z0+H/tsB+dNhNr + HfK67XPsIdJ8rQvgiggQD7zv7HqEnmb7pwt5vy4ZwxepxTd1WNGSpUeJhL3q7mn6UFZg + wqK/yFls7P8JolKxP3JFJ6WaNYksqQ8ypeQ5loR+6EGSro+uXU8ljP6BwPAUh0Pb+lmO + gtcbhjrqdzPym5pyEDY+h4JmVglbffE4b0fD9S9ppeoAamIKlqeFE+bdsjFRbEQStXtC + 28Sg== +X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc30XSDcwIhhBJmgrFoEqZk4VGFaxzuJYg5sYyJf91HRRBhbQXYKo0XjBA1GrvK7qC0VEkyYFodrclDcw== +X-Received: by 10.55.142.130 with SMTP id q124mr11528107qkd.220.1477875750527; + Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:02:30 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.140.104.33 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:01:59 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <20161029075420.slsmmy5s5tzplpi2@exolobe3> +References: <88c2c42e-3e39-ad29-c921-d078a62aa023@maxgaukler.de> + <20161029075420.slsmmy5s5tzplpi2@exolobe3> +From: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpbWkgUmFtcGlu?= <remirampin@gmail.com> +Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:01:59 -0400 +Message-ID: <CAMto89DY516an81WtHX9qVf6swvsorCv_UVMGA0cbAaMaQPUUQ@mail.gmail.com> +To: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> +X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 1885-f057-21fe-bdfd +X-Spam-Score: 4.3 +X-Spam-Score-int: 43 +X-Spam-Bar: ++++ +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:02:44 +0000 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (4.3 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + 0.2 PPF_ALTERNATIVES Body in multipart/alternative + 0.5 PPF_RECEIVED_HTTP Received header mentions http + 0.2 PPF_INREPLYTO_NODOTS In-Reply-To contains no dots after the @ + 0.2 PPF_REFERENCES_NODOTS References contains no dots after the @ + 1.0 PPF_FROM_CONTAINS_MAIL The From header contains 'mail' + 1.2 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (remirampin[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no + trust [209.85.220.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] + 0.3 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + 0.2 PPF_NUMERIC_ENTITY RAW: Body contains numeric HTML entities + 1.0 PPF_BLANK RAW: Body contains _blank + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's + domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature + 1.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source + [209.85.220.169 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: b5b6efd43804d51bf1f49b1dee60e806 +Cc: Maximilian Gaukler <development@maxgaukler.de>, obnam-dev@obnam.org +Subject: Re: [BUG] verify fails for relative root paths +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org> +List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe> +Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1050839076928611514==" +Mime-version: 1.0 +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +--===============1050839076928611514== +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0882b622038a05401ec300 + +--94eb2c0882b622038a05401ec300 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +2016-10-29 03:54 EDT, Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>: + +> [...] there is the simplicity of always unambiguously requiring the full +> path. +> +> I generally favour simplicity over convenience, however, and so I'm going +> to treat this as a non-bug. Sorry. +> + +If relative paths don't work and can't be expected to work, it seems to me +that they should be loudly refused by the client rather than perform +something that will always fail with a seemingly unrelated message like +"does not have that file". + +How about just refusing to run with relative paths? It looks like a bug. + +--=20 +R=C3=A9mi + +--94eb2c0882b622038a05401ec300 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2016= +-10-29 03:54 EDT, Lars Wirzenius <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:li= +w@liw.fi" target=3D"_blank">liw@liw.fi</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class= +=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd= +ing-left:1ex">[...] there is the simplicity of always unambiguously requiri= +ng the full path.<br> +<br> +I generally favour simplicity over convenience, however, and so I'm goi= +ng to treat this as a non-bug. Sorry.<br></blockquote></div><br></div><div = +class=3D"gmail_extra">If relative paths don't work and can't be exp= +ected to work, it seems to me that they should be loudly refused by the cli= +ent rather than perform something that will always fail with a seemingly un= +related message like "does not have that file".</div><div class= +=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">How about just refusi= +ng to run with relative paths? It looks like a bug.</div><div class=3D"gmai= +l_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">--=C2=A0</div><div class=3D"g= +mail_extra">R=C3=A9mi</div></div> + +--94eb2c0882b622038a05401ec300-- + + +--===============1050839076928611514== +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Content-Disposition: inline + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org + +--===============1050839076928611514==-- + |