summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tickets
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDistix listener <distix@pieni.net>2016-10-31 02:05:09 +0100
committerDistix listener <distix@pieni.net>2016-10-31 02:05:09 +0100
commit46578e42272ea455697b8aa4a0e076ac54d02319 (patch)
tree8fbde09dc3f12aa0c70e4a64ece38a9e3fb6740e /tickets
parent6fb2ed4e6dd40010fcc03c1227735cd606e42c3d (diff)
downloadobnam-dev-distix-46578e42272ea455697b8aa4a0e076ac54d02319.tar.gz
imported mails
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets')
-rw-r--r--tickets/8b02a339d62345ee9a0847fa0015d406/Maildir/new/1477875909.M365597P3015Q1.hrun171
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/8b02a339d62345ee9a0847fa0015d406/Maildir/new/1477875909.M365597P3015Q1.hrun b/tickets/8b02a339d62345ee9a0847fa0015d406/Maildir/new/1477875909.M365597P3015Q1.hrun
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..365c7a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/8b02a339d62345ee9a0847fa0015d406/Maildir/new/1477875909.M365597P3015Q1.hrun
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC48D22631
+ for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:02:46 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+ by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3455C1;
+ Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:02:46 +0000 (GMT)
+Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1c10zu-000621-EE; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:02:46 +0000
+Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1c10zs-00061p-PH
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:02:44 +0000
+Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169])
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <remirampin@gmail.com>)
+ id 1c10zq-00071l-NA
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:02:44 +0000
+Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id o68so147087016qkf.3
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
+ :cc; bh=IWIgNhQ8mBSZv4Rqscz9eAB4F08e3N7pJx25Gwpky1I=;
+ b=w2UA05CgjvM8rXSwi9Gs7uGyE7iD2OLUUp2X4tjweULCtvrIIrPHMhjKhniHa4JjJu
+ N9O2XLJB2GFKX205OQOECGwhNVJhFqAc6A3UpGqNF79eFvAyBGOxPp7fk/XfS1NVaPfN
+ 8OUGmSBDoYNKa1FV5gs8LgVYekfF6Qh9gTW5V2CIGZoEgCZWnwDd1O4E1TeZH8g8sVai
+ FdTYsJEXLKHVhkc4eSwKe1V8FGd2m4LErEegd8mC4dERE9N6cZyXfUmhfS8oTcAshumc
+ n6PaJdTJqlRBIDqr5uT+IbAON62EsBJKkYLblM/OFNSfV7cZ5Y9MGl/WEYRxGgLT9Dr3
+ wJWg==
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
+ :message-id:subject:to:cc;
+ bh=IWIgNhQ8mBSZv4Rqscz9eAB4F08e3N7pJx25Gwpky1I=;
+ b=k0I/x5mDyXczZ5xJ6Ck6hh/KRqHRA5D2D92xXEAJLgdNruCuzkW3Dj7aVv7f6nykYY
+ P/hcvZgSp2g4jni6O9tb/YfyeqkksfzpXm8rc1iW74WRcviHJ8OOY4Z0+H/tsB+dNhNr
+ HfK67XPsIdJ8rQvgiggQD7zv7HqEnmb7pwt5vy4ZwxepxTd1WNGSpUeJhL3q7mn6UFZg
+ wqK/yFls7P8JolKxP3JFJ6WaNYksqQ8ypeQ5loR+6EGSro+uXU8ljP6BwPAUh0Pb+lmO
+ gtcbhjrqdzPym5pyEDY+h4JmVglbffE4b0fD9S9ppeoAamIKlqeFE+bdsjFRbEQStXtC
+ 28Sg==
+X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc30XSDcwIhhBJmgrFoEqZk4VGFaxzuJYg5sYyJf91HRRBhbQXYKo0XjBA1GrvK7qC0VEkyYFodrclDcw==
+X-Received: by 10.55.142.130 with SMTP id q124mr11528107qkd.220.1477875750527;
+ Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.140.104.33 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <20161029075420.slsmmy5s5tzplpi2@exolobe3>
+References: <88c2c42e-3e39-ad29-c921-d078a62aa023@maxgaukler.de>
+ <20161029075420.slsmmy5s5tzplpi2@exolobe3>
+From: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpbWkgUmFtcGlu?= <remirampin@gmail.com>
+Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:01:59 -0400
+Message-ID: <CAMto89DY516an81WtHX9qVf6swvsorCv_UVMGA0cbAaMaQPUUQ@mail.gmail.com>
+To: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 1885-f057-21fe-bdfd
+X-Spam-Score: 4.3
+X-Spam-Score-int: 43
+X-Spam-Bar: ++++
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:02:44 +0000
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (4.3 points)
+ pts rule name description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ 0.2 PPF_ALTERNATIVES Body in multipart/alternative
+ 0.5 PPF_RECEIVED_HTTP Received header mentions http
+ 0.2 PPF_INREPLYTO_NODOTS In-Reply-To contains no dots after the @
+ 0.2 PPF_REFERENCES_NODOTS References contains no dots after the @
+ 1.0 PPF_FROM_CONTAINS_MAIL The From header contains 'mail'
+ 1.2 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (remirampin[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
+ trust [209.85.220.169 listed in list.dnswl.org]
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+ 0.3 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
+ 0.2 PPF_NUMERIC_ENTITY RAW: Body contains numeric HTML entities
+ 1.0 PPF_BLANK RAW: Body contains _blank
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
+ domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+ 1.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source
+ [209.85.220.169 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: b5b6efd43804d51bf1f49b1dee60e806
+Cc: Maximilian Gaukler <development@maxgaukler.de>, obnam-dev@obnam.org
+Subject: Re: [BUG] verify fails for relative root paths
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1050839076928611514=="
+Mime-version: 1.0
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+--===============1050839076928611514==
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0882b622038a05401ec300
+
+--94eb2c0882b622038a05401ec300
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+2016-10-29 03:54 EDT, Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>:
+
+> [...] there is the simplicity of always unambiguously requiring the full
+> path.
+>
+> I generally favour simplicity over convenience, however, and so I'm going
+> to treat this as a non-bug. Sorry.
+>
+
+If relative paths don't work and can't be expected to work, it seems to me
+that they should be loudly refused by the client rather than perform
+something that will always fail with a seemingly unrelated message like
+"does not have that file".
+
+How about just refusing to run with relative paths? It looks like a bug.
+
+--=20
+R=C3=A9mi
+
+--94eb2c0882b622038a05401ec300
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2016=
+-10-29 03:54 EDT, Lars Wirzenius <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:li=
+w@liw.fi" target=3D"_blank">liw@liw.fi</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class=
+=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
+ing-left:1ex">[...] there is the simplicity of always unambiguously requiri=
+ng the full path.<br>
+<br>
+I generally favour simplicity over convenience, however, and so I&#39;m goi=
+ng to treat this as a non-bug. Sorry.<br></blockquote></div><br></div><div =
+class=3D"gmail_extra">If relative paths don&#39;t work and can&#39;t be exp=
+ected to work, it seems to me that they should be loudly refused by the cli=
+ent rather than perform something that will always fail with a seemingly un=
+related message like &quot;does not have that file&quot;.</div><div class=
+=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">How about just refusi=
+ng to run with relative paths? It looks like a bug.</div><div class=3D"gmai=
+l_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">--=C2=A0</div><div class=3D"g=
+mail_extra">R=C3=A9mi</div></div>
+
+--94eb2c0882b622038a05401ec300--
+
+
+--===============1050839076928611514==
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
+
+--===============1050839076928611514==--
+