imported mails

2 files changed, 263 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tickets/3092ee8cdf8e49fda9937a228d0546fd/Maildir/new/1469357107.M254107P684Q2.hrun b/tickets/3092ee8cdf8e49fda9937a228d0546fd/Maildir/new/1469357107.M254107P684Q2.hrun
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1494e22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/3092ee8cdf8e49fda9937a228d0546fd/Maildir/new/1469357107.M254107P684Q2.hrun
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E981229A3
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:42:10 +0200 (CEST)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E21BFD4;
+	Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:42:10 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1bRGrK-0005XT-0f; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:42:10 +0100
+Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1bRGrI-0005XK-2o; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:42:08 +0100
+Received: from pieni.net ([95.142.166.37] ident=postfix)
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <liw@liw.fi>)
+ id 1bRGrG-0000So-Bi; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:42:08 +0100
+Received: from exolobe3.liw.fi (91-145-75-165.bb.dnainternet.fi
+ [91.145.75.165])
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C83E229A3;
+ Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:41:55 +0200 (CEST)
+Received: from exolobe3 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by exolobe3.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D3571204A4;
+ Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:41:54 +0300 (EEST)
+Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:41:53 +0300
+From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+To: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@orbis-terrarum.net>
+Message-ID: <20160724104153.GM5765@exolobe3>
+References: <robbat2-20160619T083928-020175588Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+In-Reply-To: <robbat2-20160619T083928-020175588Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
+X-Spam-Score: -2.9
+X-Spam-Score-int: -28
+X-Spam-Bar: --
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:42:07 +0100
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT    User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
+ tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ 0.5 PPF_MESSAGEID_NODOTS   Message-Id contains no dots after the @
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: 4c6022c3dc230a3b6e638b0cf7167be3
+Cc: obnam-support@obnam.org, obnam-dev@obnam.org,
+ "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>
+Subject: Re: [2/2] GPG & performance: future options
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8239696250489010361=="
+Mime-version: 1.0
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+
+--===============8239696250489010361==
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tpyx7gKuSYt+mjHM"
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+
+--tpyx7gKuSYt+mjHM
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
+Content-Disposition: inline
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+Thanks for all the analysis. It's clear that for encryption, running
+gpg for each file in the repository is quite expensive. Doing the
+encryption in-process is on the (unwritten) roadmap. I don't have time
+to work on this (including asking my crypto-savvy friends for review
+and processing their feedback), but don't let that stop anyone.
+
+On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 09:09:47AM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
+> - Method (GPG, PyCrypto, Keyczar, NaCl...)
+
+I'm strongly in favour of picking one option. I don't want to deal
+with the support matrix of having a lot of alternative
+implementations.
+
+--=20
+Schr=F6dinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is
+undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh
+
+--tpyx7gKuSYt+mjHM
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
+
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+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+=/8BT
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+--tpyx7gKuSYt+mjHM--
+
+
+--===============8239696250489010361==
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
+
+--===============8239696250489010361==--
+
diff --git a/tickets/3092ee8cdf8e49fda9937a228d0546fd/Maildir/new/1469357107.M80099P684Q1.hrun b/tickets/3092ee8cdf8e49fda9937a228d0546fd/Maildir/new/1469357107.M80099P684Q1.hrun
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f30481a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/3092ee8cdf8e49fda9937a228d0546fd/Maildir/new/1469357107.M80099P684Q1.hrun
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 811DC22A38
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:42:41 +0200 (CEST)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393F1FD4;
+	Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:42:41 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1bRGrp-0005YQ-3g; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:42:41 +0100
+Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1bRGro-0005YH-3H; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:42:40 +0100
+Received: from pieni.net ([95.142.166.37] ident=postfix)
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <liw@liw.fi>)
+ id 1bRGrm-0000Sy-9w; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:42:40 +0100
+Received: from exolobe3.liw.fi (91-145-75-165.bb.dnainternet.fi
+ [91.145.75.165])
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6450722A38;
+ Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:42:27 +0200 (CEST)
+Received: from exolobe3 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by exolobe3.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A451204A4;
+ Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:42:26 +0300 (EEST)
+Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:42:25 +0300
+From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+To: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@orbis-terrarum.net>
+Message-ID: <20160724104225.GN5765@exolobe3>
+References: <robbat2-20160619T083928-020175588Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+In-Reply-To: <robbat2-20160619T083928-020175588Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
+X-Spam-Score: -2.9
+X-Spam-Score-int: -28
+X-Spam-Bar: --
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:42:40 +0100
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT    User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
+ tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ 0.5 PPF_MESSAGEID_NODOTS   Message-Id contains no dots after the @
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: 8887c701ef4198506b295ef73f0e38b1
+Cc: obnam-support@obnam.org, obnam-dev@obnam.org,
+ "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>
+Subject: Re: [2/2] GPG & performance: future options
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8856888073519611286=="
+Mime-version: 1.0
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+
+--===============8856888073519611286==
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V7BlxAaPrdhzdIM1"
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+
+--V7BlxAaPrdhzdIM1
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
+Content-Disposition: inline
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+Oh, and also, let's keep further discussion about this on obnam-dev.
+This isn't a support issue. I only noticed after sending the previous
+mail. Thanks!
+
+--=20
+Schr=F6dinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is
+undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh
+
+--V7BlxAaPrdhzdIM1
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
+
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+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+=4/cX
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+--V7BlxAaPrdhzdIM1--
+
+
+--===============8856888073519611286==
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
+
+--===============8856888073519611286==--
+