diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1455999008.M797229P17339Q196.exolobe1')
| -rw-r--r-- | tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1455999008.M797229P17339Q196.exolobe1 | 116 |
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1455999008.M797229P17339Q196.exolobe1 b/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1455999008.M797229P17339Q196.exolobe1 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8842b14 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1455999008.M797229P17339Q196.exolobe1 @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org> +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C3952B858 + for <distix@pieni.net>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 05:55:46 +0100 (CET) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B896FCB; + Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:55:45 +0000 (GMT) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1ZrfFZ-0004QL-GK; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:55:45 +0000 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1ZrfFX-0004QE-OH + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:55:43 +0000 +Received: from mail-yk0-f180.google.com ([209.85.160.180]) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mathstuf@gmail.com>) id 1ZrfFV-0002pY-OB + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:55:43 +0000 +Received: by ykba4 with SMTP id a4so31165132ykb.3 + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:55:29 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version + :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; + bh=vbVOic7JnyuHqc1RLTJvJ0ePn80GEtHZ1zdbO/y58zY=; + b=HDFqZdtgHKu9HkrMrJ/UNiDrCWYAlZUYyE66Ybe2wkdaONo/XQJduN/uU6nB8G6O4/ + TgoGEXEh9CjwVGKB4UJyLPz9JXORtQHLpDb+NEukG7M+qDOsY8dnvuYDgDhvxs0rZJKO + CAUlddWER1g67NkFJ4FiTe+V2A18HIdSfcRUTxjUGZbTCgNz1mT+dCMKFaz54WH5/uWM + m73OUPYSXIMwci4tMyISRcXhAnNVkHPqR9i8bnnVwAm+CsNDhGQW62hgFwXiHqCMeCUD + Yn/5OMYmssvxr5S7YvTZjoS9TSsyPrNl7RXt5jlQqUqvL3kZkqZkT7V/BG7gnJalMzes + es8w== +X-Received: by 10.129.89.2 with SMTP id n2mr22553610ywb.119.1446094529892; + Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:55:29 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from localhost (10.sub-70-209-141.myvzw.com. [70.209.141.10]) + by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x185sm33290583ywf.13.2015.10.28.21.55.28 + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org> + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); + Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:55:29 -0700 (PDT) +Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:55:26 -0400 +From: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com> +To: obnam-dev@obnam.org +Message-ID: <20151029045526.GA13909@bronto-burt.dev.benboeckel.net> +References: <20150918050247.GA8128@bronto-burt.dev.benboeckel.net> + <1446094196-14166-1-git-send-email-mathstuf@gmail.com> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <1446094196-14166-1-git-send-email-mathstuf@gmail.com> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) +X-Spam-Score: -2.0 +X-Spam-Score-int: -19 +X-Spam-Bar: -- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:55:43 +0000 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.0 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam + tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists + 1.0 PPF_FROM_CONTAINS_MAIL The From header contains 'mail' + 1.2 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (mathstuf[at]gmail.com) + -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low + trust [209.85.160.180 listed in list.dnswl.org] + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's + domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: 414f5f03ee092b3fac588a5aec0a9d93 +Subject: Re: [PATCH] backup: take an inhibitor lock if possible +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +Reply-To: mathstuf@gmail.com +List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org> +List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe> +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 00:49:56 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: +> When a backup is happening, the machine should not suspend or otherwise +> go down. Add a setting for taking a systemd inhibitor lock. +> +> The code fails safely which allows both the dbus module and the +> systemd-logind DBus interface to be optional. In both cases, warnings +> are generated. + +So, I'm not really sure how to test this properly within the test suite; +the lock is really kind of opaque without running systemd-inhibit to +list the active locks. Manual testing shows that obnam is taking the +inhibitor lock (with the proper description and all) as seen with +`systemd-inhibit --list`. Can anyone without systemd and/or dbus verify +the "fails gracefully" bit? I don't have any testing machines with obnam +and without those bits. + +Thanks, + +--Ben + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org |