diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1455999012.M515964P17339Q246.exolobe1')
| -rw-r--r-- | tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1455999012.M515964P17339Q246.exolobe1 | 97 |
1 files changed, 97 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1455999012.M515964P17339Q246.exolobe1 b/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1455999012.M515964P17339Q246.exolobe1 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4d380f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1455999012.M515964P17339Q246.exolobe1 @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org> +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526C42D9C2 + for <distix@pieni.net>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 10:25:29 +0200 (CEST) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAE02C4; + Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:25:28 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1ZlBwe-0004E4-Lc; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:25:28 +0100 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1ZlBwd-0004Dx-1M + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:25:27 +0100 +Received: from pieni.net ([95.142.166.37] ident=postfix) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <liw@liw.fi>) id 1ZlBwb-0005ZH-5p + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:25:26 +0100 +Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (82-181-8-107.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.181.8.107]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4BF22D9C2; + Sun, 11 Oct 2015 10:25:17 +0200 (CEST) +Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by exolobe1.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E774084D; + Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:25:17 +0300 (EEST) +Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:25:16 +0300 +From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> +To: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com> +Message-ID: <20151011082515.GM2384@exolobe1.liw.fi> +References: <20150918050247.GA8128@bronto-burt.dev.benboeckel.net> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +In-Reply-To: <20150918050247.GA8128@bronto-burt.dev.benboeckel.net> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) +X-Spam-Score: -3.4 +X-Spam-Score-int: -33 +X-Spam-Bar: --- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:25:26 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.4 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam + tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: e606bea56426b7460dd1a96e279d41e5 +Cc: obnam-dev@obnam.org +Subject: Re: obnam should take an inhibitor lock during backup +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org> +List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe> +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 01:02:47AM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: +> During a backup, it would be nice to have obnam block suspending the +> machine. This can be done via logind's DBus API[1]. + +To me, this sounds like it'd be more useful to have a generic command +to run a process and prevent the machine from suspending until the +process has ended. Something like: + + nosuspend [options] [--] command [options] [args]... + +Example: + + nosuspend obnam backup + +This way, there wouldn't be any need for suspend blocking code in +every command line utility. + +What do you think? + +-- +Schrödinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is +undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org |