diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001178.M44641P8737Q19.hrun')
| -rw-r--r-- | tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001178.M44641P8737Q19.hrun | 118 |
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001178.M44641P8737Q19.hrun b/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001178.M44641P8737Q19.hrun new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e260e3e --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001178.M44641P8737Q19.hrun @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org> +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1383B2B7AA + for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:22:43 +0100 (CET) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B00AB9F; + Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:22:42 +0000 (GMT) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1aB2IM-0000Jv-H6; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:22:42 +0000 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1aB2IK-0000Jp-NP + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:22:40 +0000 +Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mathstuf@gmail.com>) id 1aB2II-0003La-UF + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:22:40 +0000 +Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q126so157234801iof.2 + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 07:22:33 -0800 (PST) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version + :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; + bh=+FtE6gdbIMxEr+TFbcSoG/6lVHi8CvkW8sCMOepZKtQ=; + b=HCnwYJJsry369EK5+fuo45fiLCVsI3GeDbKgQjKfT1sh8XoHQUjt5p0wezk2BSx0gQ + 5BbXC2JGteWFYIa4W4Qf9ojMEfh+CFqqj+lYQZfW1180SVnaxRadB+h8hy5PUU79/BB9 + 1ZvSJobjMKdoixwS+VZ0SSXdR49gSrttN9pQ0358fevEQpAvHtbTs8YgaKW3J/br9DGa + If59pmU9dWwZgaHXzfXWXqsqo7q6z3/0yKOirlR73TjeLgXcbTBqvVmCUKebvELzA1Vj + cV+WZK0ZUeSPzkFFaQqAJX2p5GmOu2cGGj0Gp55mNADU1Tw2FSX31h1Vlqc6cv1UB7CB + sx8w== +X-Received: by 10.107.27.6 with SMTP id b6mr20166383iob.163.1450711346636; + Mon, 21 Dec 2015 07:22:26 -0800 (PST) +Received: from megas (tripoint.kitware.com. [66.194.253.20]) + by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i195sm10429478ioe.19.2015.12.21.07.22.24 + (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); + Mon, 21 Dec 2015 07:22:25 -0800 (PST) +Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:22:24 -0500 +From: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com> +To: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> +Message-ID: <20151221152224.GA21839@megas.khq.kitware.com> +References: <20150918050247.GA8128@bronto-burt.dev.benboeckel.net> + <1446094196-14166-1-git-send-email-mathstuf@gmail.com> + <20151029045526.GA13909@bronto-burt.dev.benboeckel.net> + <20151220141633.GE2511@exolobe1.liw.fi> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <20151220141633.GE2511@exolobe1.liw.fi> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) +X-Spam-Score: -2.0 +X-Spam-Score-int: -19 +X-Spam-Bar: -- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:22:40 +0000 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.0 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam + tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists + 1.0 PPF_FROM_CONTAINS_MAIL The From header contains 'mail' + 1.2 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (mathstuf[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's + domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature + -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low + trust [209.85.223.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: 414f5f03ee092b3fac588a5aec0a9d93 +Cc: obnam-dev@obnam.org +Subject: Re: [PATCH] backup: take an inhibitor lock if possible +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +Reply-To: mathstuf@gmail.com +List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org> +List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe> +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 15:16:33 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote: +> I'm not entirely sure I'm comfortable adding this kind of code to +> Obnam. I think it'd be better off as a separate utility, kind of like +> the flock utility. It could be used like this: +> +> inhibit-suspend obnam backup +> +> Such a utility would be more generic than code specifically in Obnam. + +This tool already exists as `systemd-inhibit`. The problem is that it +needs numerous arguments to be useful (the name of the program, the +locks to take, a reason for taking the lock, etc.). I don't see this as +any different than video players taking the XSS lock to inhibit +screensavers: it's just expected behavior that the screen doesn't lock +when a video is playing just as suspending in the middle of a backup is +not something I think anyone would expect (or want barring power-down +due to low battery or a failing UPS). + +--Ben + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org |