diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets/75f7dc8776fa4b35a8e6121c131b7dcc/Maildir/new/1455998994.M367892P17339Q2.exolobe1')
| -rw-r--r-- | tickets/75f7dc8776fa4b35a8e6121c131b7dcc/Maildir/new/1455998994.M367892P17339Q2.exolobe1 | 100 |
1 files changed, 100 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/75f7dc8776fa4b35a8e6121c131b7dcc/Maildir/new/1455998994.M367892P17339Q2.exolobe1 b/tickets/75f7dc8776fa4b35a8e6121c131b7dcc/Maildir/new/1455998994.M367892P17339Q2.exolobe1 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1929aa1 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/75f7dc8776fa4b35a8e6121c131b7dcc/Maildir/new/1455998994.M367892P17339Q2.exolobe1 @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org> +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18EEC2B369 + for <distix@pieni.net>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:04:11 +0200 (CEST) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B840A8550; + Sat, 13 Jun 2015 07:04:10 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1Z3eY6-0002Ag-Ki; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 07:04:10 +0100 +Received: from inmail ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1Z3eY5-0002Aa-Gg + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 07:04:09 +0100 +Received: from pieni.net ([95.142.166.37] ident=postfix) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <liw@liw.fi>) id 1Z3eY3-00008w-Nc + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 07:04:09 +0100 +Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (82-181-8-107.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.181.8.107]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F74C2B369 + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:04:01 +0200 (CEST) +Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by exolobe1.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F152254952 + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 09:04:00 +0300 (EEST) +Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 09:03:59 +0300 +From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> +To: obnam-dev@obnam.org +Message-ID: <20150613060359.GR3008@exolobe1.liw.fi> +References: <20150521155612.Horde.LK1cVaFgiwTla5CkT434lQ8@htjn.suhail.uberspace.de> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <20150521155612.Horde.LK1cVaFgiwTla5CkT434lQ8@htjn.suhail.uberspace.de> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) +X-Spam-Score: -3.4 +X-Spam-Score-int: -33 +X-Spam-Bar: --- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sat, 13 Jun 2015 07:04:09 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.4 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam + tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +Subject: Re: proper usage of git send-email +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org> +List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe> +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:56:12PM +0200, Jan Niggemann wrote: +> My workflow is this: +> Code, check, commit (to a new branch if necessary), git format-patch -1 to +> create a patch from the last commit and then "git send-email 0001-foo.patch +> --compose" to actually compose the mail. +> +> Is that the usual way to go or are there other (better?) ways? + +What I do: + +* Do the work, ALWAYS in a new branch, even if it's just one commit. +* Create and review the patches that are to be sent. + - "rm -f *.patch && git format-patch master && less *.patch" + - if commit messages or anything else needs changing, do those + changes + - I often rebase at this point to make the sequence of patches be + clear +* "git send-email --to foo@example.com *.patch" + +Note that I'm always happy to pull from a git repo instead of getting +patches by email (and even in that case, do your changes in a +different branch than master). An e-mail to obnam-dev to do that would +be good, since it alerts me and everyone else interested that there's +things to review. Patches on the list are a little easier to respond +to with review comments, if need be, but it's not a big deal. + +-- +sic transit disci mundi, ergo obnam + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org |