diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets/829d5f9060144a30bd44cb946b0ba1c9/Maildir/new/1455998995.M536933P17339Q35.exolobe1')
| -rw-r--r-- | tickets/829d5f9060144a30bd44cb946b0ba1c9/Maildir/new/1455998995.M536933P17339Q35.exolobe1 | 106 |
1 files changed, 106 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/829d5f9060144a30bd44cb946b0ba1c9/Maildir/new/1455998995.M536933P17339Q35.exolobe1 b/tickets/829d5f9060144a30bd44cb946b0ba1c9/Maildir/new/1455998995.M536933P17339Q35.exolobe1 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a2adce3 --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/829d5f9060144a30bd44cb946b0ba1c9/Maildir/new/1455998995.M536933P17339Q35.exolobe1 @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org> +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02C2D2BECF + for <distix@pieni.net>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:18:42 +0200 (CEST) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE6E2C8; + Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:18:41 +0100 (BST) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1ZhETB-0007or-5f; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:18:41 +0100 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1ZhET9-0007ok-8l + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:18:39 +0100 +Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([64.68.201.169]) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>) + id 1ZhET6-0007mx-FK + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:18:39 +0100 +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5DFE4A9 + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:18:26 -0400 (EDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailout.easymail.ca +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -3.68 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.68 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.027, + BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=0.692] +Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (easymail-mailout.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, + port 10024) with ESMTP id nBfnbwRD5fVI for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; + Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:18:26 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com + [209.85.213.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3428AE438 + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:18:26 -0400 (EDT) +Received: by igxx6 with SMTP id x6so27019265igx.1 + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:18:25 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.50.67.179 with SMTP id o19mr26123201igt.63.1443608305636; + Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:18:25 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.107.183.65 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:18:25 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CAJQvAudeWCMhMvExSSP3whzC4TAnkeOqNU5gNSdYyGxEM9bcnQ@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAJQvAudeWCMhMvExSSP3whzC4TAnkeOqNU5gNSdYyGxEM9bcnQ@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:18:25 +0300 +Message-ID: <CAJQvAucn9R4F4he1vO8EJBoRN9f1b5YyDboT=ChNeKCkJiotcw@mail.gmail.com> +From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> +To: obnam-dev@obnam.org +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-Spam-Score: -2.1 +X-Spam-Score-int: -20 +X-Spam-Bar: -- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:18:39 +0100 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.1 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + 0.5 PPF_RECEIVED_HTTP Received header mentions http + -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low + trust [64.68.201.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: dad44cf097470dfea4dc038187207232 +Subject: Re: Unlocking the repo from the VFS layer +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org> +List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe> +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> wrote: +> Any advice on what I should do where my current patch says "TODO: Need +> to unlock the repo here."? I.e. how should I go about unlocking the +> repo from within the VFS layer when the repo layer doesn't know that +> the connection dropped? + +Looks like I should: + 1) Make the app object available to the VFS wrapper. + 2) Reach .repo from there. + 3) Make repo objects have an unlocking method that takes the VFS as +an argument so that the wrapper can pass the delegate VFS instead of +causing a re-entrant call to the wrapper itself. + +-- +Henri Sivonen +hsivonen@hsivonen.fi +https://hsivonen.fi/ + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org |