1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
|
Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B4CD24E3B
for <distix@pieni.net>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:07:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB964BA6;
Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:07:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1c1aeq-0002LR-Kp; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:24 +0000
Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1c1aeo-0002L9-Ia
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:22 +0000
Received: from pieni.net ([95.142.166.37] ident=postfix)
by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <liw@liw.fi>) id 1c1ael-0001o5-Cx
for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:22 +0000
Received: from exolobe3.liw.fi (unknown [194.157.43.230])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A74D325197
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:07:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by exolobe3.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE741121DFB
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:07:09 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <1478012829.2701.4.camel@liw.fi>
From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:07:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <d80b0e05-bfdf-3b2a-7338-f2758c8b0207@legi.grenoble-inp.fr>
References: <d80b0e05-bfdf-3b2a-7338-f2758c8b0207@legi.grenoble-inp.fr>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.1-2
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Pepperfish-Transaction: c4da-820e-68c7-6a17
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Score-int: -18
X-Spam-Bar: -
X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:22 +0000
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.9 points)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
X-Scan-Signature: f002631632f2cb3301b65fcd1d45d147
Subject: Re: Sereal encoding scheme
X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0435073011382111132=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
--===============0435073011382111132==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ECLgqU2NheXcqCcTKpdq"
--=-ECLgqU2NheXcqCcTKpdq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 15:56 +0100, Gabriel Moreau wrote:
> I remember some work about the Sereal protocol done on Perl.
Having code in Perl is of little use for Obnam, which uses Python. If
there's an implementation in Python, it's not in Debian. I don't want
to add dependencies outside of Debian to Obnam.
Also, http://blog.liw.fi/posts/dependency-cost/ is relevant.
> Maybe reuse the Sereal encoding scheme could be a good idea ?
Given the Obnam implementation has been written since May, 2015, and
doesn't seem to have any issues I care about (and that means it's not a
speed bottleneck either), I'd really rather not start looking at other
ways of doing the same thing.
--=-ECLgqU2NheXcqCcTKpdq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=XfsC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-ECLgqU2NheXcqCcTKpdq--
--===============0435073011382111132==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
obnam-dev mailing list
obnam-dev@obnam.org
http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
--===============0435073011382111132==--
|
