1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C1C2F07B
for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:12:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E25B3B;
Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:12:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1ZoFqk-0001cO-Pw; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:12:02 +0100
Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1ZoFqj-0001bi-Gr
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:12:01 +0100
Received: from pieni.net ([95.142.166.37] ident=postfix)
by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <liw@liw.fi>) id 1ZoFqh-00018P-On
for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:12:01 +0100
Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (82-181-8-107.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.181.8.107])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 253C12F07B
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:11:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from exolobe1.liw.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by exolobe1.liw.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 718A84050E
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:11:53 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:11:52 +0300
From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
Message-ID: <20151019191152.GJ2563@exolobe1.liw.fi>
References: <CAJQvAudeWCMhMvExSSP3whzC4TAnkeOqNU5gNSdYyGxEM9bcnQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAJQvAudeWCMhMvExSSP3whzC4TAnkeOqNU5gNSdYyGxEM9bcnQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Spam-Score: -3.4
X-Spam-Score-int: -33
X-Spam-Bar: ---
X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:12:01 +0100
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.4 points)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
X-Scan-Signature: 7dc7a8a4720feec014ee0c5052b99ae1
Subject: Re: Unlocking the repo from the VFS layer
X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 03:35:05PM +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> To address this, I'm trying to patch obnam to automatically reconnect
> when the SFTP layer raises an exception.
I don't think that logic belongs in the VFS layer, or in the SFTP
module. It's the kind of policy decision that an upper layer should
handle. Sorry.
> (Aside: Is it intentional that some files have a GPLv2-or-later
> license header instead of a GPLv3-or-later license header?)
Probably not. Remnants from an earlier era. But they're harmless.
--
Schrödinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is
undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh
_______________________________________________
obnam-dev mailing list
obnam-dev@obnam.org
http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
|
