1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
|
Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2292620936
for <distix@pieni.net>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 17:40:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1596B42;
Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:47 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1be2CV-0006YP-Id; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:47 +0100
Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1be2CT-0006Y7-Mu
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:45 +0100
Received: from dd20434.kasserver.com ([85.13.140.148])
by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <development@maxgaukler.de>)
id 1be2CR-0001Ny-UB
for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:45 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.46]
(dslb-088-077-016-247.088.077.pools.vodafone-ip.de [88.77.16.247])
by dd20434.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CB8B33807F7
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 17:40:37 +0200 (CEST)
To: obnam-dev@obnam.org
References: <7ddf7fdb-a88b-79dd-f04e-f5db9bafe395@maxgaukler.de>
<20160828150535.quo5jviy2rcg3ewi@exolobe3>
From: Maximilian Gaukler <development@maxgaukler.de>
Message-ID: <da07cb07-48e8-008d-7225-1196d79a23c2@maxgaukler.de>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 17:41:17 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Icedove/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160828150535.quo5jviy2rcg3ewi@exolobe3>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Score-int: -22
X-Spam-Bar: --
X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:45 +0100
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust [85.13.140.148 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.4 PPF_WINDOWS_CHARSET Content-Type is in a Windows-* charset
-0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists
0.2 PPF_INREPLYTO_NODOTS In-Reply-To contains no dots after the @
0.2 PPF_REFERENCES_NODOTS References contains no dots after the @
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
X-Scan-Signature: 33c28d4dad91734d931da14cc3b51e8a
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extend gitignore
X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
I don't get your point about why you don't want to include it. From what
you say, I understood that you also want a clean `git diff`.
As obnam already has a .gitignore, I don't see any downsides of just
adding it to make new developers' life easier, as nothing will change
for you.
From the perspective of someone starting development, having to
manually add entries to global a .gitignore is tedious and may even
cause problems somewhere else. Actually, the purpose I see in a
per-repository .gitignore is that one can just clone and be happy, which
is the standard I experienced with almost any significant open-source
project.
This request was not directed towards other projects, at least as long
as I am not working on them :-)
Thanks for your consideration,
Max
_______________________________________________
obnam-dev mailing list
obnam-dev@obnam.org
http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
|
