1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
|
Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7C892C1CC
for <distix@pieni.net>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:44:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6833BEC4;
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:44:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1ZVkAc-0000Xk-9X; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:44:02 +0100
Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1ZVkAa-0000X4-GT
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:44:00 +0100
Received: from element.ksp.sk ([158.195.16.154] helo=ksp.sk ident=postfix)
by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <lukas@ksp.sk>) id 1ZVkAY-0007OP-8X
for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:44:00 +0100
Received: from kongruent.localnet (c213-89-161-244.bredband.comhem.se
[213.89.161.244]) by ksp.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC6F84C072;
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:43:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBQb2zDocSNZWs=?= <lukas@ksp.sk>
To: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:43:50 +0200
Message-ID: <1529607.3CT0XEMtdK@kongruent>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20150829173934.GR2246@exolobe1.liw.fi>
References: <2820956.uQGutGorOu@kongruent>
<20150829173934.GR2246@exolobe1.liw.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Spam-Score: -3.4
X-Spam-Score-int: -33
X-Spam-Bar: ---
X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:44:00 +0100
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-3.4 points)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists
0.5 PPF_MESSAGEID_NODOTS Message-Id contains no dots after the @
0.2 PPF_REFERENCES_NODOTS References contains no dots after the @
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-1.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust [158.195.16.154 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
X-Scan-Signature: b517e40c42efa162324c1c57390347c8
Cc: obnam-dev@obnam.org
Subject: Re: Unlock repository after GPG error
X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
l=C3=B6rdagen den 29 augusti 2015 20:39:34 skrev Lars Wirzenius:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:52:07AM +0200, Luk=C3=A1=C5=A1 Pol=C3=A1=C4=
=8Dek wrote:
> > I have a patch which should fix the 'forget' and 'backup' commands:=
> > https://github.com/lukipuki/obnam/pull/3
>=20
> Thanks, in master now.
>=20
> > Is there any other command that needs special attention in this
> > case? It seems that only backup doesn't call repo.lock_everything()=
> > but maybe I'm mistaken.
>=20
> I can't think of other cases, but we'll see what happens.
>=20
>=20
Thanks a lot!
Lukas
_______________________________________________
obnam-dev mailing list
obnam-dev@obnam.org
http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
|
