imported mails

1 files changed, 159 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tickets/d8985ae2afe444dc87f600a30ecc523e/Maildir/new/1500462688.M174294P28408Q1.koom b/tickets/d8985ae2afe444dc87f600a30ecc523e/Maildir/new/1500462688.M174294P28408Q1.koom
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5c14203
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/d8985ae2afe444dc87f600a30ecc523e/Maildir/new/1500462688.M174294P28408Q1.koom
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net (yaffle.pepperfish.net [88.99.213.221])
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 894A541335
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:06:56 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.101.20])
+	by yaffle.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29504417B9;
+	Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:06:56 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from ip6-localhost.nat ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1dXmoi-0003u0-4S; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:06:56 +0100
+Received: from [10.112.101.21] (helo=mx3.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1dXmog-0003tl-4j
+ for <obnam-support@obnam.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:06:54 +0100
+Received: from suhail.uberspace.de ([185.26.156.24])
+ by mx3.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
+ (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <jn@hz6.de>) id 1dXmod-0007qJ-Sw
+ for obnam-support@obnam.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:06:54 +0100
+Received: (qmail 29798 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2017 11:06:43 -0000
+Received: from localhost (HELO ?10.159.21.63?) (127.0.0.1)
+ by suhail.uberspace.de with SMTP; 19 Jul 2017 11:06:43 -0000
+Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:06:38 +0200
+User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
+In-Reply-To: <A5F9DE2D-D072-407E-BFFE-B207E776BD63@w21.org>
+References: <A5F9DE2D-D072-407E-BFFE-B207E776BD63@w21.org>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+To: obnam-support@obnam.org,Juergen Nickelsen <ni@w21.org>
+From: Jan Niggemann <jn@hz6.de>
+Message-ID: <AAA60B97-D0BA-4891-902F-4AB7A6B78C66@hz6.de>
+X-Pepperfish-Transaction: 10e3-7177-5bef-666f
+X-Spam-Score: -1.9
+X-Spam-Score-int: -18
+X-Spam-Bar: -
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:06:54 +0100
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.9 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ 0.2 PPF_ALTERNATIVES       Body in multipart/alternative
+ -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
+ trust [185.26.156.24 listed in list.dnswl.org]
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+ 0.3 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: 0a2d208676412f7de12dd7144bb8abc1
+Subject: Re: Debian Stretch observations
+X-BeenThere: obnam-support@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam backup software discussion <obnam-support-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-support-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-support-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-support@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-support-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-support-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8183749733249617189=="
+Mime-version: 1.0
+Sender: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-support-bounces@obnam.org
+
+--===============8183749733249617189==
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
+ boundary="----AND57QYOTKBJDCPKDG6EAVGZVNO1VO"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+
+------AND57QYOTKBJDCPKDG6EAVGZVNO1VO
+Content-Type: text/plain;
+ charset=utf-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+Did you change obnam versions during the upgrade?
+If not, then I make the wild guess that it has to do with the new kernel t=
+hat stretch installed=2E=2E=2E
+
+Am 19=2E Juli 2017 09:50:06 MESZ schrieb Juergen Nickelsen <ni@w21=2Eorg>:
+>Hello all,
+>
+>after upgrading my external (hosted) server to Debian Stretch last
+>weekend, I have noticed that backups with obnams seem to take longer=2E
+>Where the hourly backup of the home directories (just a handful, and
+>mainly for mail) before took 2 or three minutes, it seems to be at 4 to
+>6 minutes now=2E
+>
+>At the same time I see that the page cache has a size that seems not
+>only excessive (up to 7 of 8 GB RAM, with not more disk I/O than before
+>the upgrade, when it was much smaller), but also seems to actively
+>drive the processes into the swap space, making many operations very
+>slow=2E This may or may not be the reason for the perceived slowness of
+>the backup=2E
+>
+>Now I'd like to try if the backup and other things are faster again
+>with a less excessive page cache size, but all the advice about
+>limiting it that I find on the net seems to be outdated with respect to
+>the 4=2E9 kernel=2E Any pointers, perhaps?
+>
+>Also, apparently there is not yet an obnam repository for Stretch; I
+>get by with an /etc/apt/sources=2Elist=2Ed/obnam=2Elist with
+>
+>deb http://code=2Eliw=2Efi/debian unstable main
+>
+>Regards, Juergen=2E
+
+--=20
+Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesende=
+t=2E
+------AND57QYOTKBJDCPKDG6EAVGZVNO1VO
+Content-Type: text/html;
+ charset=utf-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<html><head></head><body>Did you change obnam versions during the upgrade?<=
+br>
+If not, then I make the wild guess that it has to do with the new kernel t=
+hat stretch installed=2E=2E=2E<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">Am 19=2E J=
+uli 2017 09:50:06 MESZ schrieb Juergen Nickelsen &lt;ni@w21=2Eorg&gt;:<bloc=
+kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0=2E8ex; border-l=
+eft: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+<pre class=3D"k9mail">Hello all,<br /><br />after upgrading my external (h=
+osted) server to Debian Stretch last weekend, I have noticed that backups w=
+ith obnams seem to take longer=2E Where the hourly backup of the home direc=
+tories (just a handful, and mainly for mail) before took 2 or three minutes=
+, it seems to be at 4 to 6 minutes now=2E<br /><br />At the same time I see=
+ that the page cache has a size that seems not only excessive (up to 7 of 8=
+ GB RAM, with not more disk I/O than before the upgrade, when it was much s=
+maller), but also seems to actively drive the processes into the swap space=
+, making many operations very slow=2E This may or may not be the reason for=
+ the perceived slowness of the backup=2E<br /><br />Now I'd like to try if =
+the backup and other things are faster again with a less excessive page cac=
+he size, but all the advice about limiting it that I find on the net seems =
+to be outdated with respect to the 4=2E9 kernel=2E Any pointers, perhaps?<b=
+r /><br />Also, apparently there is not yet an obnam repository for Stretch=
+; I get by with an /etc/apt/sources=2Elist=2Ed/obnam=2Elist with<br /><br /=
+>deb <a href=3D"http://code=2Eliw=2Efi/debian">http://code=2Eliw=2Efi/debia=
+n</a> unstable main<br /><br />Regards, Juergen=2E<br /><br /></pre></block=
+quote></div><br>
+-- <br>
+Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesende=
+t=2E</body></html>
+------AND57QYOTKBJDCPKDG6EAVGZVNO1VO--
+
+
+--===============8183749733249617189==
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-support mailing list
+obnam-support@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-support-obnam.org
+
+--===============8183749733249617189==--
+