diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | blog/2020/11/21/iteration.mdwn | 55 |
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/blog/2020/11/21/iteration.mdwn b/blog/2020/11/21/iteration.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bf68f5b --- /dev/null +++ b/blog/2020/11/21/iteration.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +[[!meta title="Iteration planning meeting: November 21st"]] +[[!meta date="2020-11-21 18:29:30"]] +[[!tag meeting]] + +We finished [[!milestone 17]], completing [[!issue 115]], [[!issue +114]], [[!issue 111]], and [[!issue 100]]. We discussed the issues +that weren't completed: + +* [[!issue 20]]: nothing has happened +* [[!issue 74]]: MR in progress +* [[!issue 96]]: warning, not error +* [[!issue 101]]: Daniel has made a start on a template +* [[!issue 102]]: we did not pair +* [[!issue 107]]: Lars made a comment +* [[!issue 108]]: Lars has worked on blocker +* [[!issue 116]]: nothing has happened + +Daniel will file an issue to make it mandatory for codegen to be +explicit about the template language. + +We had three outstanding merge requests, which Daniel will review later. + +We closed [[!milestone 17]] and created [[!milestone 17]], with issues + +* [[!issue 124]] – Daniel to investigate +* [[!issue 123]] – Lars has existing code to base this on +* [[!issue 122]] – Lars did it for Python, should be simple +* [[!issue 108]] – Lars will keep chungging away at this +* [[!issue 107]] – we agreed on an implementation approach +* [[!issue 102]] – we will pair with Dan +* [[!issue 101]] – Daniel will attempt a `tests/` approach to + start with +* [[!issue 96]] and [[!issue 6]] – related, Lars will implement + warning/error collection and reporting +* [[!issue 74]] – Lars has an MR for the Python template, but + doesn't want to do the Bash one +* [[!issue 20]] – Lars and Daniel to schedule a discussion + +We filed [[!issue 125]] to track what we need to suggest others try +Subplot. + +We discussed whether libraries provided by Subplot itself should +implement the steps in all the languages supported by Subplot. We +reached the consensus that it is a worthy goal, but not easy for now. +We agree that the functionality should be available, but does not have +to be identical. However, we'll wait for actual user needs before +moving on this at all. + +# Actions + +* Daniel to file an issue about making codegen require an explicit + template declaration. +* Daniel to review open merge requests from Lars. +* Lars and Daniel to schedule a discussion about running scenarios + conditionally. |