imported mails

1 files changed, 267 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tickets/858bd68d2ee748e0a36d22d7de31aba7/Maildir/new/1456485304.M206023P9185Q1.hrun b/tickets/858bd68d2ee748e0a36d22d7de31aba7/Maildir/new/1456485304.M206023P9185Q1.hrun
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5a1c856
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/858bd68d2ee748e0a36d22d7de31aba7/Maildir/new/1456485304.M206023P9185Q1.hrun
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43FE12DB7E
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:13:46 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CCCCB0;
+	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:45 +0000 (GMT)
+Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1aZGLB-0002n0-No; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:45 +0000
+Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1aZGLA-0002mu-Lj
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:44 +0000
+Received: from mail12.static.mgsend.net ([104.130.122.12])
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128)
+ (Exim 4.80)
+ (envelope-from <bounce+33824c.700e7b-obnam-dev=obnam.org@michel-slm.name>)
+ id 1aZGL8-000183-G4
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:44 +0000
+DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=michel-slm.name;
+ q=dns/txt; 
+ s=mailo; t=1456485209; h=Content-Type: Cc: To: Subject: Message-ID:
+ Date: From: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: Sender;
+ bh=ns+3DQBb+zauIjZmb9cgaWfdVRAWWeiOWTOrIWAZ9Cg=;
+ b=Q1BWTISNOrrCZhOlK1kBGuofvihGPqBBEi041sPiYNzQ1mFO8uK/nhnMjXkVkHmAgpjb0V+R
+ X6Pz6ChP1sedSZVgl4nPFGceNEXtXGh1R8DM6WcVx5HTxSFUeEMUbFqs1c2wIqlDSjGS4uss
+ lth2J42T1jZ6ADTF/79K1anCOxw=
+DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=michel-slm.name; s=mailo;
+ q=dns; h=Sender: MIME-Version: References: In-Reply-To: From: Date:
+ Message-ID: Subject: To: Cc: Content-Type;
+ b=qn5NqTH9j0iacovxDw/IfqAaIFAHpk2xRFfcwvFaKdxCWwl7/bWaszF+dbVjvayWogKjio
+ 1W2pBh1xMFit7t/2e+jzmGMsM+zB6QEzXCRfTulHaJdnxDLvtPhsDSfcp5teXKQDMZ/Bu9R0
+ T6DZiNNZL7FrWhFIY6CfNwb+fxCVk=
+X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0ZTk0NiIsICJvYm5hbS1kZXZAb2JuYW0ub3JnIiwgIjcwMGU3YiJd
+Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com
+ [209.85.214.177])
+ by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 56d03359.7f9584aeacf0-in02;
+ Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:29 -0000 (UTC)
+Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id s6so24963477obg.3
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 03:13:29 -0800 (PST)
+X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIZALWZxIaH/N5kHSBwDL7fR0RGYAoAnp6SUBesj12zW0aSRzk3TFGTMLtUtGxgrMwN0o3+SMNDEhbRdQ==
+X-Received: by 10.182.250.169 with SMTP id zd9mr642832obc.59.1456485209336;
+ Fri, 26 Feb 2016 03:13:29 -0800 (PST)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+References: <CAMpBwxzD9SURzJ31GCNwNSp0PGvx1LNwPdh8VhmgxZmsng=0qw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <20160220152252.GF2352@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+In-Reply-To: <20160220152252.GF2352@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+From: Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@michel-slm.name>
+Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:19 +0000
+X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAMpBwxwh8B16u=vDzgpDC9g_dpGQoTSyzCwT9F6P566weYvraw@mail.gmail.com>
+Message-ID: <CAMpBwxwh8B16u=vDzgpDC9g_dpGQoTSyzCwT9F6P566weYvraw@mail.gmail.com>
+To: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+X-Spam-Score: -0.3
+X-Spam-Score-int: -2
+X-Spam-Bar: /
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:44 +0000
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-0.3 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ 0.2 PPF_ALTERNATIVES       Body in multipart/alternative
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+ 0.3 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
+ 0.2 PPF_NUMERIC_ENTITY     RAW: Body contains numeric HTML entities
+ 1.0 PPF_BLANK              RAW: Body contains _blank
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
+ domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: a666c81763ff4e2a6943a1cb0afcc507
+Cc: "obnam-dev@obnam.org" <obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] coverage-4.0a6 compatibility for larch
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3833048585176397272=="
+Mime-version: 1.0
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+--===============3833048585176397272==
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160c35c85f52d052caa634b
+
+--089e0160c35c85f52d052caa634b
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+Hi Lars,
+
+No need, I'll just drop the patch when the next release comes out.
+
+Cheers,
+
+-
+Michel Alexandre Salim
+
+On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, 22:22 Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> wrote:
+
+> Thanks. Applied and pushed. Do you need me to make a larch release of
+> this for Fedora?
+>
+> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 04:25:22PM +0000, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
+> > Hi Lars,
+> >
+> > Similar to previous coverage 4.0a6 compatibility patches; this one
+> patches
+> > the 'check' target of larch's Makefile to not assume that a .coverage
+> file
+> > exists, by using 'rm -f' instead of 'rm'.
+> >
+> > Best regards,
+> >
+> > --
+> > Michel Alexandre Salim
+>
+> > From c7dcbb40a5352106425bb3038cbdeb17b938a602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+> > From: Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@michel-slm.name>
+> > Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:03:42 +0700
+> > Subject: [PATCH] coverage-4.0a6 compatibility
+> >
+> > coverage 4.0a6 no longer generates .coverage file, so use -f when
+> > deleting .coverage to ensure deletion does not fail.
+> > ---
+> >  Makefile | 2 +-
+> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+> >
+> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
+> > index 7818f57..362c07f 100644
+> > --- a/Makefile
+> > +++ b/Makefile
+> > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ fsck-larch.1: fsck-larch.1.in fsck-larch
+> >
+> >  check:
+> >       python -m CoverageTestRunner --ignore-missing-from=3Dwithout-test=
+s
+> > -     rm .coverage
+> > +     rm -f .coverage
+> >       ./insert-remove-test tempdir 100
+> >       rm -r tempdir larch.log
+> >       cmdtest tests
+> > --
+> > 2.5.0
+> >
+>
+> > _______________________________________________
+> > obnam-dev mailing list
+> > obnam-dev@obnam.org
+> >
+> http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam=
+.org
+>
+>
+> --
+> Schr=C3=B6dinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is
+> undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh
+>
+
+--089e0160c35c85f52d052caa634b
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<p dir=3D"ltr">Hi Lars, </p>
+<p dir=3D"ltr">No need, I&#39;ll just drop the patch when the next release =
+comes out. </p>
+<p dir=3D"ltr">Cheers, </p>
+<p dir=3D"ltr">- <br>
+Michel Alexandre Salim </p>
+<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, 22:22=
+=C2=A0Lars Wirzenius &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:liw@liw.fi">liw@liw.fi</a>&gt; w=
+rote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
+;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks. Applied and pushed. D=
+o you need me to make a larch release of<br>
+this for Fedora?<br>
+<br>
+On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 04:25:22PM +0000, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:<br>
+&gt; Hi Lars,<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; Similar to previous coverage 4.0a6 compatibility patches; this one pat=
+ches<br>
+&gt; the &#39;check&#39; target of larch&#39;s Makefile to not assume that =
+a .coverage file<br>
+&gt; exists, by using &#39;rm -f&#39; instead of &#39;rm&#39;.<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; Best regards,<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; --<br>
+&gt; Michel Alexandre Salim<br>
+<br>
+&gt; From c7dcbb40a5352106425bb3038cbdeb17b938a602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001=
+<br>
+&gt; From: Michel Alexandre Salim &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:michel@michel-slm.n=
+ame" target=3D"_blank">michel@michel-slm.name</a>&gt;<br>
+&gt; Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:03:42 +0700<br>
+&gt; Subject: [PATCH] coverage-4.0a6 compatibility<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; coverage 4.0a6 no longer generates .coverage file, so use -f when<br>
+&gt; deleting .coverage to ensure deletion does not fail.<br>
+&gt; ---<br>
+&gt;=C2=A0 Makefile | 2 +-<br>
+&gt;=C2=A0 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile<br>
+&gt; index 7818f57..362c07f 100644<br>
+&gt; --- a/Makefile<br>
+&gt; +++ b/Makefile<br>
+&gt; @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ fsck-larch.1: <a href=3D"http://fsck-larch.1.in" rel=
+=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">fsck-larch.1.in</a> fsck-larch<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt;=C2=A0 check:<br>
+&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0python -m CoverageTestRunner --ignore-missin=
+g-from=3Dwithout-tests<br>
+&gt; -=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0rm .coverage<br>
+&gt; +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0rm -f .coverage<br>
+&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0./insert-remove-test tempdir 100<br>
+&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0rm -r tempdir larch.log<br>
+&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0cmdtest tests<br>
+&gt; --<br>
+&gt; 2.5.0<br>
+&gt;<br>
+<br>
+&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
+&gt; obnam-dev mailing list<br>
+&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org" target=3D"_blank">obnam-dev@obn=
+am.org</a><br>
+&gt; <a href=3D"http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/o=
+bnam-dev-obnam.org" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://listmaster.=
+pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org</a><br>
+<br>
+<br>
+--<br>
+Schr=C3=B6dinger&#39;s backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is<br=
+>
+undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh<br>
+</blockquote></div>
+
+--089e0160c35c85f52d052caa634b--
+
+
+--===============3833048585176397272==
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
+
+--===============3833048585176397272==--
+