imported mails

1 files changed, 158 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tickets/cb75a21b4a874f86ba49e06ae8d887fc/Maildir/new/1466549105.M218669P15702Q1.hrun b/tickets/cb75a21b4a874f86ba49e06ae8d887fc/Maildir/new/1466549105.M218669P15702Q1.hrun
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ca1afe9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/cb75a21b4a874f86ba49e06ae8d887fc/Maildir/new/1466549105.M218669P15702Q1.hrun
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC1372122D
+	for <distix@pieni.net>; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:43:51 +0200 (CEST)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+	by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E209CBE;
+	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:43:51 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+	by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+	id 1bFUOd-0002uQ-8h; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:43:51 +0100
+Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1bFUOb-0002u7-N5
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:43:49 +0100
+Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183])
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <robbat2@gentoo.org>) id 1bFUOY-0006Mu-4A
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:43:49 +0100
+Received: from grubbs.orbis-terrarum.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0ED2340813
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:43:29 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: (qmail 6771 invoked by uid 10000); 21 Jun 2016 22:43:30 -0000
+Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:43:29 +0000
+From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>
+To: obnam-support@obnam.org, obnam-dev@obnam.org
+Message-ID: <robbat2-20160621T214546-798847087Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
+References: <20160619083904.GA18768@orbis-terrarum.net>
+ <bfb55cce-243c-2d4a-4dfe-3600fed3237a@antipoul.fr>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+In-Reply-To: <bfb55cce-243c-2d4a-4dfe-3600fed3237a@antipoul.fr>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
+X-Spam-Score: -9.8
+X-Spam-Score-int: -97
+X-Spam-Bar: ---------
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:43:49 +0100
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-9.8 points)
+ pts rule name              description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT    User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
+ tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT         User-Agent: exists
+ -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI       RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high
+ trust [140.211.166.183 listed in list.dnswl.org]
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -1.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
+ -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: 87e18d81b9e4f41a85b0d3590907fca5
+Subject: Re: [1/2] GPG & performance: a deep-dive
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+Reply-To: obnam-support@obnam.org, obnam-dev@obnam.org
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4727345661079074573=="
+Mime-version: 1.0
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+
+--===============4727345661079074573==
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2WS97oupGEGbYNpW"
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+
+--2WS97oupGEGbYNpW
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
+Content-Disposition: inline
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:53:37PM +0200, Adrien CLERC wrote:
+> Le 19/06/2016 =E0 10:39, Robin H. Johnson a =E9crit :
+> > - Plan for moving to PyCrypto or other for symmetric crypto
+> I totally understand the goal, and can only support you. However,
+> PyCrypto is not compatible with PyPy, as 'Cryptography' is. That's why
+> paramiko did the switch recently (http://www.paramiko.org/changelog.html).
+> Based on https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/pull/394 it seems that the
+> switch is better on every aspect. Do you have the time to inspect this
+> solution?
+If you look at email 2/2, the big concern isn't which toolkit we pick,
+but that the data can be linked to the correct toolkit when it comes
+time to decrypt it later, and that old chunks are also still correctly
+handled.
+
+I have used Crytography.io elsewhere, and it was on par with PyCrypto
+performance for what I was doing, but I didn't benchmark heavily.
+
+At that point, with files including a header that describes how we need
+to handle them, encryption.py can become an interface, and we can
+implement many variations.=20
+
+Example variations:
+1. Pure GPG (present state)
+2. GPG for asymmetric, PyCrypto/Cryptography.io/PyNaCl for symmetric
+3. Pure PyCrypto/Cryptography.io/PyNaCl
+4. Upgrade path variations - Read ANY, write Y
+
+#2 would be a trivial upgrade for existing repos: just upgrade all of
+your clients and enable it. Old chunks would continue to be encrypted
+with GPG, and still readable, while new chunks are generated much
+faster.
+
+If you don't care about the above, you can have a PyCrypto or
+Cryptography.io implementation tomorrow, but recovering your data in
+future disasters will be much more painful.
+
+--=20
+Robin Hugh Johnson
+Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Trustee & Treasurer
+E-Mail   : robbat2@gentoo.org
+GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
+GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136
+
+--2WS97oupGEGbYNpW
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
+Content-Description: Digital signature
+
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v2.1
+Comment: Robbat2 @ Orbis-Terrarum Networks - The text below is a digital signature. If it doesn't make any sense to you, ignore it.
+
+iKYEARECAGYFAldpwxBfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
+bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDc1OTQwNEJFQkQ0MUY3MTIzODIzODZFRjNF
+OTIyQzIyMzIzM0MyMkMACgkQPpIsIjIzwizm1ACgnQMll9fpg5G01pRPTDOkF+uu
+n9IAoNjSLlDK1Oz5NGGlaIt7DWcAqatu
+=jmne
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+--2WS97oupGEGbYNpW--
+
+
+--===============4727345661079074573==
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
+
+--===============4727345661079074573==--
+