summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001190.M761385P8737Q45.hrun
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001190.M761385P8737Q45.hrun')
-rw-r--r--tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001190.M761385P8737Q45.hrun128
1 files changed, 128 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001190.M761385P8737Q45.hrun b/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001190.M761385P8737Q45.hrun
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..34a43f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tickets/20bdae3913de49d4afd544d36996ce4b/Maildir/new/1456001190.M761385P8737Q45.hrun
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
+X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
+Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
+Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F25552B7AA
+ for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:17:28 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
+ by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9C7B74;
+ Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:17:28 +0000 (GMT)
+Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1aB39L-0004CX-UG; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:17:27 +0000
+Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
+ by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
+ id 1aB39K-0004CR-PO
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:17:26 +0000
+Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180])
+ by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128)
+ (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mathstuf@gmail.com>) id 1aB39I-0004zv-TF
+ for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:17:26 +0000
+Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id to18so38879947igc.0
+ for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:17:19 -0800 (PST)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version
+ :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding
+ :in-reply-to:user-agent;
+ bh=flvQv+URTA8hssnKdZNsWtvvuaRTKcifaOu7hc3zmxc=;
+ b=v+fAB8JJUHa8ylvJCSB9YVz0Ndx4svARsoPyzxnFxzprRfle9Xn+A+Q3+2X1ElxSrr
+ bvST9FOYpvNWU6TB0B4IrRE7xZ6YN4z2extjKkQLvQPQ9I/mMuHezuckW3OfXb0b7eCW
+ flzhf6aP1sUyX0ixIbdA/6pygHRGHIMelw1GFC72q1RB937XOghF8jSCoLRTTGlNzYT+
+ 0Zc23aeL9Ex0x9cwSRXsfUQI1HXZ9+fY8bsqDnh72f7krOO6uUIuekb3emvTND8oyDrF
+ EqhD53RqVD0Ygi+TZIAf0HYGLzs+zE+ReTl9vWgAKk0NvQ6tRNeDZs6yBFExzVUchmqx
+ zwIA==
+X-Received: by 10.50.150.5 with SMTP id ue5mr8731859igb.50.1450714633253;
+ Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:17:13 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from megas (tripoint.kitware.com. [66.194.253.20])
+ by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rv1sm8364421igb.15.2015.12.21.08.17.12
+ (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
+ Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:17:12 -0800 (PST)
+Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:17:06 -0500
+From: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
+To: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
+Message-ID: <20151221161706.GD21839@megas.khq.kitware.com>
+References: <20150918050247.GA8128@bronto-burt.dev.benboeckel.net>
+ <1446094196-14166-1-git-send-email-mathstuf@gmail.com>
+ <20151029045526.GA13909@bronto-burt.dev.benboeckel.net>
+ <20151220141633.GE2511@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+ <20151221152224.GA21839@megas.khq.kitware.com>
+ <20151221153318.GR2511@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
+Content-Disposition: inline
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+In-Reply-To: <20151221153318.GR2511@exolobe1.liw.fi>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
+X-Spam-Score: -2.0
+X-Spam-Score-int: -19
+X-Spam-Bar: --
+X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:17:26 +0000
+X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.0 points)
+ pts rule name description
+ ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+ -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
+ trust [209.85.213.180 listed in list.dnswl.org]
+ -1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
+ tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists
+ 1.0 PPF_FROM_CONTAINS_MAIL The From header contains 'mail'
+ 1.2 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (mathstuf[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
+ [score: 0.0000]
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
+ domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
+X-Scan-Signature: e22476795c0c271ab9cf3b1ad5ae1506
+Cc: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] backup: take an inhibitor lock if possible
+X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
+Precedence: list
+Reply-To: mathstuf@gmail.com
+List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
+List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
+ <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
+Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
+
+On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 16:33:18 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
+> That just indicates to me that you should write a simpler program,
+> perhaps as a wrapper around systemd-inhibit. :)
+
+Would this at least be acceptable to include in obnam? obnam-inhibit? It
+seems silly to have everyone rewrite this thing when it is such an
+important behavior.
+
+> GUI programs such as video players are not generally composable.
+> Command line programs such as Obnam are. That's an important
+> distinction.
+
+Sorry, when am I ever going to pipe obnam output to anything other than
+a log file (or less, sed, etc.)? Does obnam even read stdin?
+
+Obnam being composable would, to me, indicate that obnam has some sort
+of backup support when used within a pipeline of the content passing
+through it. Sort of like a record/replay utility (though this would just
+be "cat" with memory…like a filesystem perhaps? :) ). It really feels
+more like a standalone application to me (like newsbeuter, slrn, mpv,
+and other such programs; the persistent configuration file is probably
+what makes me feel that it really is different), but maybe I'm just
+unaware of some obnam capabilities?
+
+--Ben
+
+_______________________________________________
+obnam-dev mailing list
+obnam-dev@obnam.org
+http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org