1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
|
Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org>
X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net
Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net
Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F25552B7AA
for <distix@pieni.net>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:17:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20])
by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9C7B74;
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:17:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1aB39L-0004CX-UG; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:17:27 +0000
Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net)
by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian))
id 1aB39K-0004CR-PO
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:17:26 +0000
Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180])
by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mathstuf@gmail.com>) id 1aB39I-0004zv-TF
for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:17:26 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id to18so38879947igc.0
for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:17:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version
:content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding
:in-reply-to:user-agent;
bh=flvQv+URTA8hssnKdZNsWtvvuaRTKcifaOu7hc3zmxc=;
b=v+fAB8JJUHa8ylvJCSB9YVz0Ndx4svARsoPyzxnFxzprRfle9Xn+A+Q3+2X1ElxSrr
bvST9FOYpvNWU6TB0B4IrRE7xZ6YN4z2extjKkQLvQPQ9I/mMuHezuckW3OfXb0b7eCW
flzhf6aP1sUyX0ixIbdA/6pygHRGHIMelw1GFC72q1RB937XOghF8jSCoLRTTGlNzYT+
0Zc23aeL9Ex0x9cwSRXsfUQI1HXZ9+fY8bsqDnh72f7krOO6uUIuekb3emvTND8oyDrF
EqhD53RqVD0Ygi+TZIAf0HYGLzs+zE+ReTl9vWgAKk0NvQ6tRNeDZs6yBFExzVUchmqx
zwIA==
X-Received: by 10.50.150.5 with SMTP id ue5mr8731859igb.50.1450714633253;
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from megas (tripoint.kitware.com. [66.194.253.20])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rv1sm8364421igb.15.2015.12.21.08.17.12
(version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:17:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:17:06 -0500
From: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
To: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
Message-ID: <20151221161706.GD21839@megas.khq.kitware.com>
References: <20150918050247.GA8128@bronto-burt.dev.benboeckel.net>
<1446094196-14166-1-git-send-email-mathstuf@gmail.com>
<20151029045526.GA13909@bronto-burt.dev.benboeckel.net>
<20151220141633.GE2511@exolobe1.liw.fi>
<20151221152224.GA21839@megas.khq.kitware.com>
<20151221153318.GR2511@exolobe1.liw.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20151221153318.GR2511@exolobe1.liw.fi>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-Spam-Score: -2.0
X-Spam-Score-int: -19
X-Spam-Bar: --
X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:17:26 +0000
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.0 points)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust [209.85.213.180 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-1.0 PPF_USER_AGENT_MUTT User-Agent: contains Mutt (Mutt isn't a spam
tool) -0.5 PPF_USER_AGENT User-Agent: exists
1.0 PPF_FROM_CONTAINS_MAIL The From header contains 'mail'
1.2 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mathstuf[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam
X-Scan-Signature: e22476795c0c271ab9cf3b1ad5ae1506
Cc: obnam-dev@obnam.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backup: take an inhibitor lock if possible
X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mathstuf@gmail.com
List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org>
List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org>
List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>,
<mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 16:33:18 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> That just indicates to me that you should write a simpler program,
> perhaps as a wrapper around systemd-inhibit. :)
Would this at least be acceptable to include in obnam? obnam-inhibit? It
seems silly to have everyone rewrite this thing when it is such an
important behavior.
> GUI programs such as video players are not generally composable.
> Command line programs such as Obnam are. That's an important
> distinction.
Sorry, when am I ever going to pipe obnam output to anything other than
a log file (or less, sed, etc.)? Does obnam even read stdin?
Obnam being composable would, to me, indicate that obnam has some sort
of backup support when used within a pipeline of the content passing
through it. Sort of like a record/replay utility (though this would just
be "cat" with memory…like a filesystem perhaps? :) ). It really feels
more like a standalone application to me (like newsbeuter, slrn, mpv,
and other such programs; the persistent configuration file is probably
what makes me feel that it really is different), but maybe I'm just
unaware of some obnam capabilities?
--Ben
_______________________________________________
obnam-dev mailing list
obnam-dev@obnam.org
http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org
|
