diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tickets/829d5f9060144a30bd44cb946b0ba1c9/Maildir/new/1455998997.M81437P17339Q63.exolobe1')
| -rw-r--r-- | tickets/829d5f9060144a30bd44cb946b0ba1c9/Maildir/new/1455998997.M81437P17339Q63.exolobe1 | 113 |
1 files changed, 113 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tickets/829d5f9060144a30bd44cb946b0ba1c9/Maildir/new/1455998997.M81437P17339Q63.exolobe1 b/tickets/829d5f9060144a30bd44cb946b0ba1c9/Maildir/new/1455998997.M81437P17339Q63.exolobe1 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1e0218c --- /dev/null +++ b/tickets/829d5f9060144a30bd44cb946b0ba1c9/Maildir/new/1455998997.M81437P17339Q63.exolobe1 @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ +Return-Path: <obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org> +X-Original-To: distix@pieni.net +Delivered-To: distix@pieni.net +Received: from bagpuss.pepperfish.net (bagpuss.pepperfish.net [148.251.8.16]) + (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02F992C147 + for <distix@pieni.net>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:03:03 +0100 (CET) +Received: from platypus.pepperfish.net (unknown [10.112.100.20]) + by bagpuss.pepperfish.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770ED2D8; + Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:03:02 +0000 (GMT) +Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=platypus.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1ZsUsA-0006re-9N; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:03:02 +0000 +Received: from inmail0 ([10.112.100.10] helo=mx0.pepperfish.net) + by platypus.pepperfish.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) + id 1ZsUs8-0006qp-DW + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:03:00 +0000 +Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([64.68.201.169]) + by mx0.pepperfish.net with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) + (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>) + id 1ZsUs5-00008z-Bt + for obnam-dev@obnam.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:03:00 +0000 +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFBFE5DD + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 08:02:46 -0400 (EDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailout.easymail.ca +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -3.674 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.674 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.033, + BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=0.692] +Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (easymail-mailout.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, + port 10024) with ESMTP id PZxILDdfJibk for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; + Sat, 31 Oct 2015 08:02:45 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com + [209.85.213.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 096C1E59E + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 08:02:45 -0400 (EDT) +Received: by igdg1 with SMTP id g1so28995013igd.1 + for <obnam-dev@obnam.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:02:44 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.50.7.70 with SMTP id h6mr2617873iga.63.1446292964734; Sat, + 31 Oct 2015 05:02:44 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.107.19.137 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:02:44 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <20151019191152.GJ2563@exolobe1.liw.fi> +References: <CAJQvAudeWCMhMvExSSP3whzC4TAnkeOqNU5gNSdYyGxEM9bcnQ@mail.gmail.com> + <20151019191152.GJ2563@exolobe1.liw.fi> +Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:02:44 +0200 +Message-ID: <CAJQvAud5pODJr+TXRz39Ba0KV8iDqhExrzF8uvCcxhTT3WJgJw@mail.gmail.com> +From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> +To: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-Spam-Score: -2.1 +X-Spam-Score-int: -20 +X-Spam-Bar: -- +X-Scanned-By: pepperfish.net, Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:03:00 +0000 +X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.1 points) + pts rule name description + ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- + 0.5 PPF_RECEIVED_HTTP Received header mentions http + -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low + trust [64.68.201.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% + [score: 0.0000] +X-ACL-Warn: message may be spam +X-Scan-Signature: e606bea56426b7460dd1a96e279d41e5 +Cc: obnam-dev@obnam.org +Subject: Re: Unlocking the repo from the VFS layer +X-BeenThere: obnam-dev@obnam.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Obnam development discussions <obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/obnam-dev-obnam.org> +List-Post: <mailto:obnam-dev@obnam.org> +List-Help: <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org>, + <mailto:obnam-dev-request@obnam.org?subject=subscribe> +Sender: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org +Errors-To: obnam-dev-bounces@obnam.org + +On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> wrote: +> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 03:35:05PM +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: +>> To address this, I'm trying to patch obnam to automatically reconnect +>> when the SFTP layer raises an exception. +> +> I don't think that logic belongs in the VFS layer, or in the SFTP +> module. It's the kind of policy decision that an upper layer should +> handle. Sorry. + +Can you give a more specific hint of which layer I should be looking at? + +My thinking with putting the recovery on the VFS layer on the level of +principle is similar to how TCP makes IP seem reliable instead of +making the application worry about failures and on the practical level +it seemed harder to track down all higher-layer call sites that might +experience an exception than to mechanically wrap all methods on the +VFS layer. + +-- +Henri Sivonen +hsivonen@hsivonen.fi +https://hsivonen.fi/ + +_______________________________________________ +obnam-dev mailing list +obnam-dev@obnam.org +http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/obnam-dev-obnam.org |